LexBlog IP

MAY 19, 2023

Clarifying Copyright Fair Use in Commercialized and Licensed Visual Arts: Insights from Warhol v. Goldsmith by Jaime Chandra Clarifying Fair Use in Commercialized & Licensed Visual Arts: Insights from the Warhol v. We’re talking about Andy Warhol Foundation for Visual Arts, Inc. Let’s dive in!

Fair Use 40

Fair Use Art Licensing Derivative Work 40

Kluwer Copyright Blog

DECEMBER 17, 2023

For the last few months, I have been wondering if our belief in “fair dealing” (or broadly, “limitations and exceptions”) has silently slipped into our “faith” in it – a faith that demands complete surrender to it while blinding us to the harm it covertly causes to the public domain. What Fuels Faith in the First Place?

Fair Use 64

Fair Use Public Domain Copyright Litigation 64

Copyright Lately

APRIL 3, 2023

The future of “controlled digital lending” is in doubt after a court rules that the Internet Archive’s online library is not protected by fair use. IA’s Open Library project includes millions of public domain books that users can download and read without restriction. Craigslist, circa 1999.

Fair Use 75

Fair Use Copying Publishing Copyright 75

Velocity of Content

JUNE 8, 2022

Their reuse of the underlying materials may (in theory) be excused under the doctrine of fair use, including parody , or what is increasingly referred to as ‘ transformative use’ – a concept itself derived from the four fair use factors called out in Title 17 (Section 107).

Derivative Work 105

Derivative Work Public Domain Copyright Fair Use 105

Copyright Lately

OCTOBER 25, 2021

The judge rejected BMG’s fair use defense, holding that the defendants took more elements from the “Nightmare on Elm” street films than they needed to accomplish any parodic purpose. New Line successfully moved for a preliminary injunction to block the video’s release. Skully Curly. The Ghostly Trio.

Copyright 145

Copyright Cinema Copying Copyright Infringement 145

Biswajit Sarkar Copyright Blog

JULY 19, 2022

Recognize the subtleties of fair use. If you can’t get permission, you can still freely use original work for non-commercial purposes if you are aware of your rights under fair use. Before using someone else’s creation, consider how your actions will affect its market worth.

Copyright Infringement 52

Copyright Infringement Copyright Public Domain Copying 52

JIPEL Copyright Blog

MARCH 9, 2022

There are clear advantages to the use of these technologies in the museum context. addition of written or pictorial elements) of a work not in the public domain and/or where the creator is still alive. For the most part, liability may be avoidable: museums could defend any copyright (e.g.,

Moral Rights 52

Moral Rights Art Fair Use Derivative Work 52

LexBlog IP

APRIL 18, 2023

Presumably afraid that a decision one way or the other would move financial markets and have unforeseen consequences, the Court assumed the declaring code was protected by copyright and decided the case on fair use. ” A fair use of declaring code might not be a fair use of implementing code.

Copyright 52

Copyright Fair Use Copying Public Domain 52

IP and Legal Filings

JANUARY 22, 2024

Introduction The Intellectual property laws are designed in such a way that not only reward the creator of his intellectual creation thereby incentivising other creators for further innovation, while balancing the rights of the creator with the right of the society to access information or knowledge.

Ownership 52

Ownership Copyright Fair Use Intellectual Property 52

43(B)log

FEBRUARY 22, 2022

Designed to be freely available licensed or public domain; we occasionally use fair use images where no free image is available, such as when a famous work has been destroyed. RT: Designing for abuse is a great idea and not something that 512 and 1201 did.

Copyright 45

Copyright Fair Use Music Licensing 45

43(B)log

DECEMBER 20, 2022

Defendants allegedly used editing tools to compress scenes that constituted “about 70% or more of” the 2001 Documentary into minutes of footage that then appeared in the 2013 Documentary. In addition, the design of the title of the 2013 Documentary was allegedly similar to plaintiffs’ registered 12 O’Clock Boyz logo.

Fair Use 52

Fair Use Trademark Copyright Editing 52

43(B)log

FEBRUARY 19, 2022

While Rogers rejected any consideration of whether the speaker had adequate alternatives to using the plaintiff’s trademark because speakers are entitled to choose their own ways of speaking, the religious cases embrace the concept of adequate alternatives. What to do next? As expert in the field, people come to her for advice.

Trademark Law 72

Trademark Law Trademark Art Branding 72

IIPRD

MARCH 5, 2025

Upon independent and less human intervention by a machine in making the work, one expects a built-in gap in the legal design. The gaming sector faced such an outbreak in recent years as AI tools, which were trained on fan-created content, sparked the consent and fair use debate. UK Copyright, Designs, and Patents Act, 1988.

Copyright 52

Copyright Intellectual Property Copyright Law Artwork 52

Kluwer Copyright Blog

OCTOBER 17, 2023

As a software-implemented creation, it was not in the public domain and the company willing to exploit the work had to clear the right to reproduction. For this purpose, providers should publish a sufficiently detailed summary of the use of training data protected under copyright law. Secondly, para.

Copyright 125

Copyright Art Copyright Law Licensing 125

The IPKat

JULY 22, 2021

The title of this book clearly sets out its premise: trademark protection has encroached into what used to be solely copyright’s domain, resulting in an undesirable over-protection of works which impoverishes the public domain and restricts others’ creative endeavours.

Trademark 57

Trademark Public Domain Copyright Cease and Desist 57

Patently-O

APRIL 6, 2023

In that case, the Court found that Google’s use of Java API naming conventions in its Android operating system was fair use under copyright law. Because its fair use decision decided the case, the court did not rule separately on whether the API was even copyrightable in the first place. 1183 (2021).

Copyright 58

Copyright Copying Copyright Infringement Fair Use 58

43(B)log

JUNE 24, 2022

Ornamental use may help to maintain rights even if core uses cease. Can it be used in different ways in TM as a thumb on the scale rather than a binary? 2d Cir in Descriptive fair use—how “pure” is the descriptive character of the use? Ilanah Simon: In Europe, you can’t use overlap to police boundaries.

Trademark Law 75

Trademark Law Law Trademark Registration 75

43(B)log

FEBRUARY 24, 2023

Display on front of T-shirt: ornamental, decorative; have legislature consider purposes of TM and PTO as well to be gatekeeper to protect public domain. Every time a court uses Rogers, it’s covertly holding that it would be unconstitutional to apply a broader set of rights; we’re tailoring the test with this in mind.

Trademark 69

Trademark False Advertising Fair Use Branding 69

Technology & Marketing Law Blog

JUNE 21, 2023

The other issue in Jack Daniel’s was whether VIP could invoke the “noncommercial use of a mark” exemption from dilution liability in 15 U.S.C. 1125(c)(3)(C) by claiming its humorous use of the Jack Daniel’s marks was not pure commercial speech because it poked fun at the company in the Bad Spaniels design.

Trademark 105

Trademark Blogging Trademark Law Fair Use 105

43(B)log

JUNE 24, 2022

In the fair use calculus? In what ways is the ornamental nature of a defendant’s use relevant to defences based on artistic or expressive use (or some other defence)? Defenses: we don’t have fair use as a catchall; specific list of enumerated defenses. But there is a defense for nondistinctive use.

Trademark Law 56

Trademark Law Law Trademark Fair Use 56

Technology & Marketing Law Blog

FEBRUARY 13, 2023

Sixth, assuming Woodward published copyrighted material without Trump’s authorization, was he permitted to do so, either as a fair use, or by the First Amendment? If the work was published without proper copyright notice, the work entered the public domain. This strikes me as the wrong result. 2d at 206. (The

Copyright 131

Copyright Blogging Publishing Fair Use 131

LexBlog IP

JANUARY 10, 2024

Government by its officers and employees should not be subject to copyright” and fall “in the public domain.” ” US Const., It is strange because that would mean that the unpublished portions would also be government works available for public use. . “The basic premise of [S]ection 105.[is]

Ownership 52

Ownership Copyright Government Intellectual Property 52