This site uses cookies to improve your experience. To help us insure we adhere to various privacy regulations, please select your country/region of residence. If you do not select a country, we will assume you are from the United States. Select your Cookie Settings or view our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Used for the proper function of the website
Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Strictly Necessary: Used for the proper function of the website
Performance/Analytics: Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
In our new paper, The Truth About DesignPatents , we debunk three widely held—but incorrect—views about U.S. designpatents. Taken together, these myths paint a grim picture of designpatents: Half of all designpatent applications are rejected. Acquiring DesignPatents.
Designpatents and utility patents are two different things. Designpatents protect ornamental designs, such as the shape of a perfume bottle or the design on flatware. To be patentable, however, both designs and functional inventions must satisfy two requirements.
2022) raises a number of important designpatent law questions, including an issue of first-impression of the scope of “comparison prior art” available for the ordinary observer infringement analysis under Egyptian Goddess, Inc. An accused design does not have to exactly match the drawings. by Dennis Crouch.
This post will focus on another key issue from the case – the relevance of logos in designpatentinfringement analysis. Still, ornamental logos found on the accused product can still be relevant as visual distractors in the process of evaluating similarities and differences between the claimed design and accused design.
The Federal Circuit Court of Appeals recently narrowed the scope of “comparison prior art” that may be used in a designpatentinfringement analysis. Comparison prior art” includes references used to help highlight distinctions between a plaintiff’s claimed design and a defendant’s design that is accused of infringing.
How can an Amazon seller benefit from designpatents? Those who tend to ignore IP are the ones caught off guard when, for example, a patent owner blocks them from selling a competing product on Amazon. If you are an Amazon seller, designpatents must be considered – either offensively or defensively.
15, 2023) , the Federal Circuit vacated a jury verdict of non-infringement in a design-patentinfringement action filed by Columbia Sportswear against Seirus Innovative Accessories. DesignPatent No. Background Columbia asserted U.S.
What is the designpatentinfringement test? The test for designpatentinfringement involves a visual comparison between the patenteddesign and the accused product. The issue is whether the accused product would deceive an ordinary observer to suppose it to be the patenteddesign.
by Dennis Crouch Seirus has petitioned for writ of certiorari in its long-running designpatent dispute with Columbia Sportswear. Columbia’s designpatent claims an “ornamental design of a heat reflective material” as shown in the figures. Patent D657,093. 21, 2024) (question paraphrased).
Designpatents and utility patents are two different things. Designpatents protect ornamental designs, such as the shape of a perfume bottle or the design on flatware. To be patentable, however, both designs and functional inventions must satisfy two requirements.
Get a DesignPatent Instead The path to registering a trademark can be strewn with landmines. When your trademark application faces difficult rejections, would a designpatent make more sense? Before making that decision, keep in mind the 1-year grace period for filing US patents. Rejected Trademark Application?
The Court vacated the Board’s finding that an asserted prior art reference fails to qualify as analogous art. Precedential and Key Federal Circuit Opinions - NETFLIX, INC. DIVX, LLC [OPINION] (2022-1138, 9/11/2023) (Hughes, Stoll, and Stark) - Stoll, J. By: WilmerHale
How do you defend a patentinfringement claim? Accusations of patentinfringement should be taken seriously. Whether they are asserted in the form of cease-and-desist letter or an Amazon patent violation, an accused infringer needs to gauge the seriousness of the problem. Are your patent claims invalid?
These appear to be the first—and certainly the first precedential—Federal Circuit cases dealing with the merits of one of the numerous “Schedule A” designpatent cases that have been filed in recent years in the NDIL. It is clear, from reading the decision, that the designpatentinfringement claims lacked merit.
the Federal Circuit reversed the PTAB’s finding that Gamon’s designpatents on gravity-fed displays for soup were non-obvious. Campbell comparison of solid-lined portion of claimed design to primary (Linz) reference. In Campbell Soup Co. Gamon Plus, Inc. , 4th 1268 (Fed. 19, 2021) (“ Gamon II ”).
The parties faced off in a rematch at the Federal Circuit following an earlier bout involving the same designpatent, U.S. The Quarles & Brady design rights legal team is nationally-recognized for its extensive knowledge and practice experience in this complex and important field. Seirus Innovative Accessories, Inc.
by Dennis Crouch The Federal Circuit recently vacated a jury verdict of non-infringement in the long-running designpatent dispute between outdoor apparel companies Columbia Sportswear and Seirus Innovative Accessories. The lower court thus erred by permitting the jury to consider additional references. DesignPatent No.
15, 2023) , the Federal Circuit vacated a jury verdict of non-infringement in a design-patentinfringement action filed by Columbia Sportswear against Seirus Innovative Accessories. DesignPatent No. ” Thus, the prior-art design must be applied to the article of manufacture identified in the claim.
In the case, Plaintiff California Costume Collections (“CCC”) filed its Complaint against Defendant Pandaloon, LLC (“Pandaloon”) for declaratory judgment of non-infringement, invalidity, and unenforceability of U.S. DesignPatent No. D806,325 (the “D325 Patent”) for a “Pet Costume.”
Contact US patent attorney Vic Lin at vlin@icaplaw.com or call (949) 223-9623 to explore how our patentinfringement experience can benefit your business. How can you tell the difference between a published application and a granted patent? At the outset, designpatent applications are never published.
24, 2023) WS sued Wayfair, alleging patentinfringement, Lanham Act false advertising, Massachusetts and California statutory unfair competition and Massachusetts false advertising based on alleged copying of West Elm products. WS has nine relevant designpatents, which it alleged Wayfair infringed. Wayfair Inc.,
This case began back in 2006 when Crocs sued Double Diamond and others for patentinfringement of Crocs’s designpatents. The Court held that “origin” in the Lanham Act refers only to the source of the physical products sold in the marketplace, not to the creator of the underlying creative content.
The maker of the “Murphy Bed,” for example, lost its trademark protection because the term Murphy bed, in the eyes of a substantial majority of the public, refers to a bed that falls into a wall enclosure, not to the specific bed sold by the Murphy Door Bed Company.
Call US patent attorney Vic Lin at (949) 223-9623 or email vlin@icaplaw.com to explore how we can help. Are you selling a patented product or not? With designpatents, the comparison is quite simple. Does your product look like the drawings in your designpatent? Utility patents are trickier.
Reverse engineering refers to taking a finished product and analyzing it to determine the recipe for making it, what its functionality is, the ingredients and/or composition of it, and/or the process for making it. For example, the original creator of the trade secret must have used it within the United States before the patent priority date.
Patents are typically more complicated, and utility patent claims will require more sophistication than designpatentinfringement assertions. Invalidity means that their alleged IP rights are not valid, regardless of whether or not you infringe.
In the case, Plaintiff California Costume Collections (“CCC”) filed its Complaint against Defendant Pandaloon, LLC (“Pandaloon”) for declaratory judgment of non-infringement, invalidity, and unenforceability of U.S. DesignPatent No. D806,325 (the “D325 Patent”) for a “Pet Costume.”
Respondent: Whether a district court’s discretion under the Lanham Act permits using the financial statements of “non-arms’ length” affiliates to adjust a disgorgement award against a trademark infringer, and only that infringer, when the infringer has claimed $0 in profits. ” 15 U.S.C.
Reverse engineering refers to taking a finished product and analyzing it to determine the recipe for making it, what its functionality is, the ingredients and/or composition of it, and/or the process for making it. .” Also, confidential business information is not a trade secret if it can be reverse-engineered. ” See 35 U.S.C. §
In recent years, there have been a number of high-profile litigations in the United States involving patents directed to each of the above-referenced components, including patent litigations related to cathodes, 13 anodes, 14 separators, 15 electrolytes, 16 battery cell packaging, 17 and battery module packaging.
We organize all of the trending information in your field so you don't have to. Join 9,000+ users and stay up to date on the latest articles your peers are reading.
You know about us, now we want to get to know you!
Let's personalize your content
Let's get even more personalized
We recognize your account from another site in our network, please click 'Send Email' below to continue with verifying your account and setting a password.
Let's personalize your content