This site uses cookies to improve your experience. To help us insure we adhere to various privacy regulations, please select your country/region of residence. If you do not select a country, we will assume you are from the United States. Select your Cookie Settings or view our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Used for the proper function of the website
Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Strictly Necessary: Used for the proper function of the website
Performance/Analytics: Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
Federal Circuit and the Canadian Intellectual Property Office (CIPO) reshaping the landscape of designpatentlaw. These updates reflect a broader trend towards more flexible and inclusive IP protection, ensuring that innovators can better safeguard their relative designs. By: Bennett Jones LLP
In 2024, designpatentlaw encountered a couple of major changes: the implementation of a new designpatent bar, and the upending of decades of obviousness law under 35 U.S.C. 103 in view of the en banc United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit (CAFC)s decision in LKQ Corporation v.
In our new paper, The Truth About DesignPatents , we debunk three widely held—but incorrect—views about U.S. designpatents. Taken together, these myths paint a grim picture of designpatents: Half of all designpatent applications are rejected. Acquiring DesignPatents.
GM Global Technology Operations LLC, overturning the long-standing obviousness test for designpatents. On May 21, 2024, the Federal Circuit issued an en banc decision (full court, instead of the typical three-judge panel) in LKQ Corp. By: Wolf, Greenfield & Sacks, P.C.
A recent decision of the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit has fundamentally altered the law on prior art anticipation for designpatent applications. 4, 2021), the Federal Circuit reversed a decision by the USPTO’s Patent Trial and Appeal…. In this decision, captioned In re: SurgiSil, L.L.P.
by Dennis Crouch The USPTO is officially establishing a separate designpatent practitioner bar with its final rule published on November 16, 2023 and effective January 2, 2024. Currently, a single patent bar governs registration for anyone seeking to practice before the USPTO in utility, plant, and designpatent matters.
by Dennis Crouch In a highly anticipated en banc decision, the Federal Circuit has overruled the longstanding Rosen-Durling test for assessing obviousness of designpatents. Rejecting the argument that KSR did not implicate designpatent obviousness, the court reasoned that 35 U.S.C. § GM Global Tech. Operations LLC , No.
GM Global Technology Operations LLC has brought attention to the ongoing debate surrounding designpatentlaw, particularly with respect to the Rosen-Durling test for designpatent obviousness. By: ArentFox Schiff
The landscape of designpatentlaw has recently evolved with the introduction of a new standard for determining obviousness. For decades, theRosen-Durlingtest was used to assess obviousness of designpatents. By: Womble Bond Dickinson
Designpatents and utility patents are two different things. Designpatents protect ornamental designs, such as the shape of a perfume bottle or the design on flatware. To be patentable, however, both designs and functional inventions must satisfy two requirements.
Sources say updates to the Chinese PatentLaw regarding designpatents are likely to bring in a wave of new filings, and a surge in litigation along with it
A recent decision of the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit has fundamentally altered the law on prior art anticipation for designpatent applications. 171(a), designpatent protection is permitted to “[w]hoever invents any new, original and ornamental design for an article of manufacture.” (Emphasis added).
In a landmark decision, the US Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit has overruled the longstanding test for assessing whether a designpatent is considered obvious in view of prior art.
GM overruled three decades of precedent and adopted a new standard for assessing the obviousness of designpatents, leaving many questions unanswered, say Sean Murray and Jeremiah Helm at Knobbe Martens. The Federal Circuit's recent en banc decision in LKQ v.
Hrdy, Professor of Intellectual Property Law at University of Akron School of Law, and Daniel H. Are inventions described in works of science fiction patentable? It may surprise you, then, to learn that the genre of science fiction is deeply indebted to patentlaw and patent theory. Guest post by Camilla A.
by Dennis Crouch Designpatents continue to rise in importance, but the underlying law full of eccentricities. The crux of the issue lies in the manner patentlaw decisions are typically written. The case itself involves designpatents covering GM parts, such as front fenders. Teleflex Inc.,
2022) raises a number of important designpatentlaw questions, including an issue of first-impression of the scope of “comparison prior art” available for the ordinary observer infringement analysis under Egyptian Goddess, Inc. An accused design does not have to exactly match the drawings. by Dennis Crouch.
What is the meaning of broken or dashed lines in a designpatent? While I’m not sure if you can call it a loophole, US designpatents enable a particular option in the drawings that can potentially broaden protection. In a US designpatent, the claimed design comprises what is drawn in solid lines.
This post will focus on another key issue from the case – the relevance of logos in designpatent infringement analysis. Still, ornamental logos found on the accused product can still be relevant as visual distractors in the process of evaluating similarities and differences between the claimed design and accused design.
Are they protectable by designpatents? In this post we will analyze the availability of designpatents for digital commodities and how it compares with other Asian countries like Japan, South Korea and Singapore. In China, a GUI alone cannot be registered as a designpatent. Article 2.4 Section 4.4.2
The PatentLaw of the People’s Republic of China (hereinafter referred to as the Chinese PatentLaw), which came into force on June 1, 2021, has made some amendments to the sections concerning designpatents, including the introduction of the partial design system and the national priority of design, and the extension of the duration of the design (..)
According to Article 27 of the Chinese PatentLaw, where a patent application for a design is filed, documents such as a request, drawings or photographs of the design and a brief description of the design shall be submitted. By: Linda Liu & Partners
Late last week, more than half a dozen amicus briefs were filed in support of GM Global Technology Operations in a case that is set to potentially shake up designpatentlaw. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit (CAFC) to keep the law as is in order to avoid major disruptions.
By Sarah Burstein, Professor of Law at Suffolk University Law School LKQ Corp. As Professor Crouch has noted , the Federal Circuit has granted rehearing en banc in the designpatent case of LKQ v. Designpatents cover different things (ornamental designs as opposed to useful inventions).
Utility patents are for functional inventions. Designpatents protect the look of something functional, regardless of whether the functional aspects are new. Because of this, a popular use of designpatents is to protect the outside of common consumer products. What’s more common than the written word?
Patent Practice: Creation of a DesignPatent Practitioner Bar by John DeStefano The United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) has proposed a significant change to the rules of practice in patent cases. Enable more underrepresented groups to practice designpatentlaw.
Are they protectable by designpatents? In this post we will analyze the availability of designpatents for digital commodities and how it compares with other Asian countries like Japan, South Korea and Singapore. In China, a GUI alone cannot be registered as a designpatent. Article 2.4 Section 4.4.2
A designpatent protects a new, original, ornamental design for an article of manufacture. Ornamental” means that the design is purely decorative; the patentability is based on its visual aspects. Designpatents protect only the appearance of the article, not any aspect of functionality.
Designpatents offer valuable protection in a patent portfolio, including conferring different strategic advantages compared to those of utility patents. 1] Likewise, designpatents are not subject to attacks under 35 U.S.C. § ” [6]. ” [6]. ” [6].
Designpatents offer valuable protection in a patent portfolio, including conferring different strategic advantages compared to those of utility patents. For example, designpatents allow for recovery of “total profits” — not just lost profits or reasonable royalties as provided for infringed utility patents. [1]
Kilpatrick Townsend Partners Babak Kusha and Justin Eurek recently presented “Must-Knows in DesignPatents for Patent Professionals and In-House Counsel” at the firm’s Kilpatrick Townsend Intellectual Property Seminar (KTIPS).
The landscape of design protection has seen significant developments on both sides of the Atlantic, with the U.S. undergoing a pivotal shift in designpatentlaw following the Federal Circuits decision in LKQ Corporation v. GM Global Technology Operations LLC, No. 2021-2348 (Fed. May 21, 2024). By: Volpe Koenig
According to the PatentLaw, ‘design’ refers to the whole or a part of a product; any new design of the shape, the pattern or their combination of a product; or the combination of the colour with the shape or pattern of a product that has high aesthetic appeal and is fit for industrial application.
In May, the Federal Circuit eliminated the long-standing test for designpatent obviousness. In its place, the Federal Circuit emphasized a flexible approach to the designpatent obviousness analysis, grounded in the Graham factors.1 1 This is a big change in designpatentlaw.
What is a designpatent continuation application? US patentlaw allows an applicant to file a “child” patent application while the “parent” application is still pending. This rule applies to both utility and designpatent applications. Be careful though.
Over the course of 2024, the patentlaw landscape has continued to evolve as significant court rulings and emerging technologies shaped its direction. By: Irwin IP LLP
Managed by The Department of Intellectual Property (DIP) under the Ministry of Commerce it supports a global practice of IP laws. Designs: Any configuration, composition of lines or any special appearance used on a product Petty Patent: An invention that is new and capable of industrial application, as per Thai Patentlaw.
As outlined in our previous post, on June 1, 2021 the Fourth Amendment to the Chinese PatentLaw came into effect, allowing partial claiming in designpatent applications.
This PatentLaw case involves a patent infringement lawsuit brought by Fa-Hsing Lu against Hyper Bicycles, Inc. regarding two designpatents Lu holds for the ornamental design of a bicycle. By: Whitcomb Selinsky, PC
By David Hricik, Mercer Law School. Mike Bohn (VLP Law Group LLP): Surviving, Pivoting, and Thriving in the Changing Global IP Marketplace. Dan Tanner (Tanner IP PLLC): The Ethics of Educating Clients about Patent Vulnerabilities – a Litigator’s Perspective.
The Spanish government has approved a draft bill to reform the three main industrial property laws: the Trademark Law, the Industrial DesignLaw and the PatentLaw. Trademark Law. Industrial DesignLaw. PatentLaw. For further information, please contact the author.
In 2024, the Federal Circuit provided a number of important clarifications to distinct areas of patentlaw including designpatent obviousness, expert testimony admissions and patent term adjustments all of which are poised to have an influence going forward, say attorneys at Knobbe Martens.
by Dennis Crouch The Federal Circuit recently vacated a jury verdict of non-infringement in the long-running designpatent dispute between outdoor apparel companies Columbia Sportswear and Seirus Innovative Accessories. DesignPatent No. Columbia Sportswear North America, Inc. Seirus Innovative Accessories, Inc. ,
China's PatentLaw stipulates that where a patent infringement dispute involves a utility model patent or a designpatent, the people's court or the relevant administrative department may require the patentee or the interested parties to submit the patent right evaluation report (or PRER for short) of the asserted patent, which is made by the CNIPA (..)
We organize all of the trending information in your field so you don't have to. Join 9,000+ users and stay up to date on the latest articles your peers are reading.
You know about us, now we want to get to know you!
Let's personalize your content
Let's get even more personalized
We recognize your account from another site in our network, please click 'Send Email' below to continue with verifying your account and setting a password.
Let's personalize your content