This site uses cookies to improve your experience. To help us insure we adhere to various privacy regulations, please select your country/region of residence. If you do not select a country, we will assume you are from the United States. Select your Cookie Settings or view our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Used for the proper function of the website
Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Strictly Necessary: Used for the proper function of the website
Performance/Analytics: Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
In late November 2021, Lululemon launched a lawsuit for designpatentinfringement against Peloton in relation to perceived similarities in the design elements of various pieces of activewear, including sports bras and leggings.
26, 2024) - On August 26, 2024, the Western District of Wisconsin issued a decision adjudicating a number of motions in a case involving a thicket of intellectualproperty claims and counterclaims. and its affiliated parties (“Woodland”), asserting designpatentinfringement, false advertising, trade secret.
Designpatents and utility patents are two different things. Designpatents protect ornamental designs, such as the shape of a perfume bottle or the design on flatware. To be patentable, however, both designs and functional inventions must satisfy two requirements.
15, 2023) , the Federal Circuit vacated a jury verdict of non-infringement in a design-patentinfringement action filed by Columbia Sportswear against Seirus Innovative Accessories. DesignPatent No. Background Columbia asserted U.S.
Applications for designpatents have surged in recent years, with the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) reporting a 20% increase in applications over the last five years.
Earlier this month, ten of the world’s largest companies were accused of infringingdesignpatents claiming animated graphical user interfaces (GUIs). These assertions were made in addition to at least ten other lawsuits filed since September 2021 asserting animated GUI designpatents.
Affordable ways to enforce intellectualproperty. If you don’t have at least two million dollars laying around to sue for patentinfringement, this post is for you. Thankfully, you can enforce intellectualproperty without spending your life savings. Does cheap IP enforcement exist?
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit (“Federal Circuit”) clarified the law on comparison prior art in designpatent cases. In the initial case, Columbia Sportswear North America, Inc. (“Columbia”) sued Seirus Innovative Accessories, Inc. (“Seirus”) for infringing U.S. DesignPatent No.
A designpatent protects a new, original, ornamental design for an article of manufacture. “Ornamental” means that the design is purely decorative; the patentability is based on its visual aspects. Designpatents protect only the appearance of the article, not any aspect of functionality.
A designpatent protects a new, original, ornamental design for an article of manufacture. Ornamental” means that the design is purely decorative; the patentability is based on its visual aspects. Designpatents protect only the appearance of the article, not any aspect of functionality.
As discussed here, in September 2018, an Illinois federal court judge ruled that UGG is not a generic term for sheepskin boots and that the United States owner of the popular UGG brand, Deckers Outdoor Corporation, was permitted to pursue its claims for trademark and designpatentinfringement against an Australian company, Australian Leather Ltd.
The United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) issued its one millionth designpatent on September 26, 2023. D1,000,000 claims the ornamental design for a dispensing comb. This milestone comes during a particularly prolific period for designpatents.
The parties faced off in a rematch at the Federal Circuit following an earlier bout involving the same designpatent, U.S. The Quarles & Brady design rights legal team is nationally-recognized for its extensive knowledge and practice experience in this complex and important field. Seirus Innovative Accessories, Inc.
PUMA also alleges that the Brooks shoe the “Aurora BL” infringes upon their DesignPatent No. D897,075 and is being sold in connection with the infringing use of PUMA’s NITRO mark. Therefore, Plaintiff is seeking damages for willful trademark infringement in violation of 15 U.S.C.
Designpatents and utility patents are two different things. Designpatents protect ornamental designs, such as the shape of a perfume bottle or the design on flatware. To be patentable, however, both designs and functional inventions must satisfy two requirements.
Johnson claims it owns multiple utility and designpatents including those at issue in this case, U.S. Patent Nos. 11,022,332 , 10,684,029 , 10,528,013 , 8,826,165 , 8,190,728 , D788,785 , D924,888 , D924,890 (collectively, “Asserted Patents”). The case was assigned to Judge Damon R. Gotsch, Sr. 3:21-cv-00501-DRL-MGG.
District Court for the Northern District of Illinois against hoverboard products alleged to infringe four designpatents due to “substantive defects” in the court’s reasoning for granting the injunctions. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit (CAFC) vacated two separate preliminary injunction orders granted by the U.S.
Cross, the Plaintiff is the owner of three designpatents for convertible t-shirt designs, U.S. Patent Nos. D/580,633, D/581,136 , and D/341,471 (collectively, the “Patents in Suit”). Practice Tip: The current designpatent term, if filed on or after May 13, 2015 is 15 years from the date of grant.
In June 2021 the Shenzhen Administration for Market Regulation (Shenzhen AMR) issued the first ever provisions on administrative injunctions against the infringement of a designpatents, including online infringements. It was a revolutionary provision. I covered this topic in more details in a previous blog ( here ).
District Court for the District of Pennsylvania’s summary judgment that a medical device designpatent was not invalid under the on-sale bar. The district court found the patent was infringed and awarded damages in the amount of $1,247,910. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit (CAFC) today reversed the U.S.
the Federal Circuit reversed the PTAB’s finding that Gamon’s designpatents on gravity-fed displays for soup were non-obvious. Fox Factory , said the court, is not limited to assessing secondary considerations of non-obviousness of utility patents, but also applies to designpatents. Gamon Plus, Inc. ,
The company also owns a designpatent covering the product. The action would allege both (1) Federal PatentInfringement; and (2) Unfair Competition (based upon Texas state law). The action would allege both (1) Federal PatentInfringement; and (2) Unfair Competition (based upon Texas state law).
In June 2021 the Shenzhen Administration for Market Regulation (Shenzhen AMR) issued the first ever provisions on administrative injunctions against the infringement of a designpatents, including online infringements. It was a revolutionary provision. I covered this topic in more details in a previous blog ( here ).
Save the Date to Attend the 16 th Annual USPTO Design Day The 2023 iteration of the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO)’s annual Design Day will be held on May 4, 2023, with options to attend either in-person at USPTO headquarters in Alexandria, Virginia or virtually.
A freedom to operate opinion (FTO) is a legal opinion from a qualified intellectualproperty attorney that concludes a proposed commercial product or process may be made, used, sold, or offered for sale without infringing another party’s intellectualproperty rights. IntellectualProperty , Patents.
This case began back in 2006 when Crocs sued Double Diamond and others for patentinfringement of Crocs’s designpatents. Therefore, Dastar ‘s unaccredited copying did not constitute a false designation of origin actionable under § 43(a) of the Lanham Act. Crocs largely prevailed in those actions.
Companies rely on intellectualproperty (“IP”) rights to protect their valuable information, creations, and branding. IP rights come in several forms: copyrights, trademarks, patents, and trade secrets. As the U.S. First, it is important to understand what a trade secret is. in connection with an internal commercial use.”
As further explained below, companies should thus very seriously consider the inclusion of patent markings on all relevant products. DesignPatent No. 13, 2015, which was the designpatent asserted in the matter noted above. DesignPatent No. At bottom are two annotated versions of a figure from U.S.
Leader Accessories LLC reversing a contempt finding entered in the Western District of Wisconsin over alleged violations of a protective order from a designpatentinfringement case between Static and Leader. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit (CAFC) issued a precedential decision in Static Media LLC v.
15, 2023) , the Federal Circuit vacated a jury verdict of non-infringement in a design-patentinfringement action filed by Columbia Sportswear against Seirus Innovative Accessories. DesignPatent No. ” Thus, the prior-art design must be applied to the article of manufacture identified in the claim.
In its complaint, Skull Shaver claimed that Ideavillage’s leg shaver infringed its designpatent on a head shaver. The patent-in-suit is U.S. D693,060 (“the D’060 patent”) for an electric head shaver, and the accused product is a Flawless Legs Shaver, which is itself covered by U.S.
Patents and trademarks are two forms of intellectualproperty protection, but they serve different purposes. Here’s an overview of how patent protection and trademark protection differ: What is a Patent? Patents expire after a set term; trademarks can be renewed indefinitely. What is a Trademark?
In the present case too there will be many legal issues related to IntellectualProperty. There is an urgent need to shed some light on intellectualpropertyinfringement in this virtual world which will be dealt with further in the article. IntellectualProperty and Metaverse. Copyright Infringement.
United States law offers four types of protection for intellectualproperty, namely patents, trademarks, copyrights, and trade secrets. Only two of these, patents and trade secrets, can grant you the protection of ideas. The Price of Exclusion by Patent – Disclosure to the Public.
With the increased funding pouring into this sector has come a desire to protect the intellectualproperty in the products, research, and developments brought to market. Coastal Harvest, LLC , denied a Motion to Dismiss asserting the illegality doctrine against cannabis related patents for extracting compounds from plant materials.
In the case, Plaintiff California Costume Collections (“CCC”) filed its Complaint against Defendant Pandaloon, LLC (“Pandaloon”) for declaratory judgment of non-infringement, invalidity, and unenforceability of U.S. DesignPatent No. D806,325 (the “D325 Patent”) for a “Pet Costume.”
Judge Dow converted the previously entered Temporary Restraining Order (TRO) into a Preliminary Injunction (PI) against the challenging defendants in this designpatent dispute involving wireless earphone headbands.
for alleged patentinfringement of its fitness products in Bell’s sporting goods stores, including their Indianapolis, Indiana, Bells of Steel USA Showroom. According to the complaint, Rogue Fitness owns several design and utility patents for fitness equipment, including Patent No. Continue reading
On its surface, a cease-and-desist letter seems like a less expensive way to enforce intellectualproperty rights. Perhaps you might want to send them a C&D letter to get them to respect your patents. Would it make sense to send them a trademark infringement letter. Why send a cease-and-desist letter?
The United States Patent and Trademark Office issued Patent Nos. D667,080 , D567,015 , D670,356 , and D670,786 (collectively, the asserted patents) to Gema in 2012. The DesignPatents are for a variety of powder guns and spray equipment. According to the Complaint, Defendant, First in Finishing, Inc.
Companies rely on intellectualproperty (“IP”) rights to protect their valuable information, creations, and branding. IP rights come in several forms: copyrights, trademarks, patents, and trade secrets. As the U.S. First, it is important to understand what a trade secret is. ” See 35 U.S.C. § § 273.
In the case, Plaintiff California Costume Collections (“CCC”) filed its Complaint against Defendant Pandaloon, LLC (“Pandaloon”) for declaratory judgment of non-infringement, invalidity, and unenforceability of U.S. DesignPatent No. D806,325 (the “D325 Patent”) for a “Pet Costume.”
Additionally, the patent practitioner may recommend filing multiple patents to cover the invention. For example, multiple patents may include more than one utility patent to protect the functional aspects and/or a designpatent to protect the non-functional aspects. Infringement possibilities.
We organize all of the trending information in your field so you don't have to. Join 9,000+ users and stay up to date on the latest articles your peers are reading.
You know about us, now we want to get to know you!
Let's personalize your content
Let's get even more personalized
We recognize your account from another site in our network, please click 'Send Email' below to continue with verifying your account and setting a password.
Let's personalize your content