Remove Design Patent Remove Intellectual Property Remove Litigation Remove Patent
article thumbnail

A Look Ahead: Key Intellectual Property Legal Topics in 2024

JD Supra Law

As we begin a new year, our attorneys look ahead at intellectual property topics they expect will be trending in 2024. They cover areas including life sciences, litigation, post-grant proceedings, artificial intelligence, design patents, and trademarks. What should in-house counsel be on the lookout for in 2024?

article thumbnail

Impact of Full Federal Circuit’s Design Patent Decision is Far from Obvious

IP Watchdog

Applications for design patents have surged in recent years, with the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) reporting a 20% increase in applications over the last five years.

Insiders

Sign Up for our Newsletter

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

article thumbnail

What are the intellectual property rights for startups?

Biswajit Sarkar Copyright Blog

What are Intellectual Property Rights (IPRs)? Intellectual Property Rights (IPRs) refer to the legal rights granted to individuals or businesses for their creations or inventions. WHY ARE INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY RIGHTS IMPORTANT FOR STARTUPS? Why are Intellectual Property Rights Important for Startups?

article thumbnail

Suffolk University Law School IP Center, Fourth Annual Intellectual Property & Innovation Conference

43(B)log

Design patents play a role when we have them, typically a handbag/jewelry/diamond cuts/chain designs/shoes. Seems like a lower bar for entry for design patent than TM protection. Lowry: For many people/products, the first few years are the only years that matter, and design patents are a tool for that.

article thumbnail

CAFC Says District Court Correctly Invalidated Design Patent

IP Watchdog

Design Patent No. D779,828 (‘828 patent) invalid. The district court held the ‘828 patent to be invalid for reasons of functionality and obviousness.

article thumbnail

Full Federal Circuit to Review Challenge to Test for Design Patent Obviousness

IP Watchdog

GM Global Technology Operations, which affirmed a Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB) ruling that LKQ failed to show by a preponderance of the evidence that GM’s design patent was anticipated or would have been obvious. Patent D855,508 covers a “vehicle front skid bar.”

article thumbnail

Design Patents are Heating Up at the Federal Circuit, Again

LexBlog IP

Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit (“Federal Circuit”) clarified the law on comparison prior art in design patent cases. Design Patent No. D657,093 (“the D’093 Patent”) via sales of its products containing HeatWave™ liner material, as illustrated side-by-side below.