Plagiarism Today

AUGUST 29, 2022

SA: This means “share alike” and allows others to create derivative works based on the original, but any derivative must be licensed under the same terms. ND: This means “no derivatives” which bars the creation of derivative works. The post The Basics of Open Access appeared first on Plagiarism Today.

Journalism 264

Journalism Derivative Work Publishing Licensing 264

Plagiarism Today

NOVEMBER 9, 2022

However, publishing companies had been continuing to collect royalties on behalf of songwriters even after the rights were reclaimed due to the law saying that publishers can continue licensing any existing derivative works. The post 3 Count: Royalty Redirection appeared first on Plagiarism Today.

Derivative Work 242

Derivative Work Licensing Copyright Plagiarism 242

Plagiarism Today

JULY 28, 2021

The lawsuit alleges that the group is committing copyright infringement not only because they are making derivative works based upon their games, but because they are circumventing copyright protection tools. Only three of the defendants were identified by name, two located in the U.S.

Copyright Infringement 246

Copyright Infringement Derivative Work Artwork Licensing 246

Plagiarism Today

SEPTEMBER 28, 2021

” The case raises questions of fair use and whether the new paintings were transformative enough to be non-infringing or if they were simply derivative works. The post The Battle Over Poker NFTs appeared first on Plagiarism Today.

Fair Use 279

Fair Use Non-Fungible Tokens Copyright Derivative Work 279

Copyright Lately

JANUARY 23, 2023

Instead, the lawsuit is premised upon a much more sweeping and bold assertion—namely that every image that’s output by these AI tools is necessarily an unlawful and infringing “derivative work” based on the billions of copyrighted images used to train the models. You’d be wrong. 17 U.S.C. §

Derivative Work 111

Derivative Work Art Copying Fair Use 111

Kluwer Copyright Blog

SEPTEMBER 18, 2024

The ability for students to complete parts of their curriculum by means of automated tools has caused unease in academic communities in light of the growing inability to properly distinguish between honest student work and AI-generated submissions. For instance, can students claim AI-generated output as their own intellectual creation?

Copyright 130

Copyright Higher Education Copyright Infringement Ownership 130

Kluwer Copyright Blog

AUGUST 7, 2023

Thus, guided by the principle of equality, copyright operates as a spectrum of creativity, where the level of protection granted to a work corresponds to its level of originality. [2] 2] At one end of the spectrum, we find plagiarism: a completely derivative work that fails to contribute any creative elements to the original piece.

Copyright 52

Copyright Derivative Work Fair Use Copyright Law 52

LexBlog IP

MAY 19, 2023

Goldsmith Could Reshape the Copyright Landscape Inspiration, Derivative Works, Appropriation, and Infringement: Understanding the Differences Empowering Artists: Benefits and Considerations Navigating the Aftermath: Key Takeaways from Warhol v. Goldsmith Navigating the Future Legal Landscape Warhol v. .”

Fair Use 40

Fair Use Art Licensing Derivative Work 40

Patently-O

DECEMBER 11, 2023

courts have addressed the legality of non-expressive uses of copyrighted works in the context of other copy-reliant technologies, including software reverse engineering, [2] plagiarism detection software, [3] and the digitization of millions of library books to enable meta-analysis, text data mining, and search engine indexing. [4]

Copyright 96

Copyright Fair Use Copyright Law Copyright Infringement 96

43(B)log

AUGUST 9, 2024

seems like this is going to have trouble with derivative works] Amanda Levendowski, Fairer Public Benefit Bias and harms of works aren’t taken into account in fair use analysis: recruits a legal tool typically aimed at one set of problems for the purpose of cleverly addressing a different set of problems.

Fair Use 59

Fair Use Marketing Marketing Licensing 59

LexBlog IP

OCTOBER 25, 2023

Dorland alerted publishers, writing conferences, and journalists to what she considered Larson’s plagiarism and ethical betrayal. But this holding left the Court to consider whether Dorland’s efforts to publicize Larson’s “plagiarism” amounted to defamation or tortious interference. ’ Piccone v.

Copyright 52

Copyright Social Media Plagiarism Fair Use 52