Derivative Work Editing Fair Use 
Kluwer Copyright Blog
MAY 9, 2022
Orbison song could be fair use because it transformed the original song by adding something new, with a different purpose, or a new meaning or message. have grappled with how broadly or narrowly to interpret the concept of transformativeness when assessing fair use defenses to charges of copyright infringement.
TorrentFreak
JANUARY 17, 2024
is one of the most interesting cases in history to rely on a fair use defense, arguing that the alleged infringement qualifies as a parody. ” 2 Live Crew had previously sought to license the track from Acuff-Rose to be used as a parody; Acuff-Rose refused and 2 Live Crew used it anyway. .” Campbell v.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Velocity of Content
JUNE 8, 2022
Preface: I wanted to learn more about the concept (and applications) of “derivative works” and adaptations under copyright law, and I was searching for a useful example that might also be interesting for readers of Velocity of Content to read about. All copyrights, except one, expire.*.
JIPL Online
MARCH 15, 2021
7] Before the court could decide if the subtitled version, a type of derivative work, could still be protected even if the underlying film on its own was available to be used by all, both parties settled. [8]. 9] Both parties reached an amicable settlement. [10] 11] The case has also been settled. [12] ANALYSIS/PREDICTION.
Kluwer Copyright Blog
APRIL 22, 2024
Technically, from a copyright perspective, the NFTs were derivative works of the Paintings (underlying works), since the former included major copyrightable elements of the (previously created) latter. More from our authors: International Cybersecurity and Privacy Law in Practice, Second Edition by Charlotte A.
SpicyIP
OCTOBER 9, 2024
Discussing the decision of the US Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit in Hachette Book Group v. Internet Archive, our fellowship applicant Tanishka Goswami explains the implication of the decision on fair use. The NEL was held to be a derivative work, and the Archive’s lending practices violative of copyright law.
LexBlog IP
MAY 31, 2023
The Court held that the first factor of the copyright fair use test favored respondent photographer, Lynn Goldsmith, rather than petitioner, Andy Warhol Foundation for the Visual Arts (“AWF”). Around this time, Goldsmith learned of the additional works comprising the Prince Series. for Visual Arts, Inc.
Expert insights. Personalized for you.
100 
Let's personalize your content