This site uses cookies to improve your experience. To help us insure we adhere to various privacy regulations, please select your country/region of residence. If you do not select a country, we will assume you are from the United States. Select your Cookie Settings or view our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Used for the proper function of the website
Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Strictly Necessary: Used for the proper function of the website
Performance/Analytics: Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
Socialmedia (aka Facebook) were not a part of the conversation. This raises the question: does the press publishers’ right apply to socialmedia? While socialmedia were not explicitly singled out, they seem to comfortably fall within the ISSP definition. Do socialmedia make content available?
I never blogged the dual state and federal rulings in the SocialMedia Addiction cases from last Fall. Because it was underdeveloped, the court tells the plaintiffs to try that theory again before the court will definitively rule on it. As a result, Zuckerberg’s personal liability might still be in play.
The Canadian government plans to regulate the use of artificial intelligence in search results and when used to prioritize the display of content on search engines and socialmedia services. AI is widely used by both search and socialmedia for a range of purpose that do not involve ChatGPT-style generative AI.
His probation conditions included this restriction: not knowingly post, display or transmit on socialmedia or through his cell phone any symbols or information that [he] knows to be, or that the Probation Officer informs [him] to be, gang-related. JT said the term “socialmedia” was impermissibly vague.
This is a case focusing on ownership of socialmedia accounts. See “ SocialMedia Ownership Disputes Part II: Bridal Wear Company Takes Back Control of Instagram Account from Ex-Employee ” and “ Another Confused Entry in the SocialMedia Account Ownership Jurisprudence–JLM v. (See The court also found “Ms.
The bill applies to “socialmedia platforms” that: “(A) Construct a public or semipublic profile within a bounded system created by the service. (B) ” This definition of “socialmedia” has been around for about a decade, and it’s awful. Who’s Covered by the Bill?
Utah’s Minor Protection in SocialMedia Act contains two major provisions. First, it requires socialmedia companies to conduct age assurance of their users to a 95% accuracy rate, along with an appellate process for misclassified users. Utah argued that the law doesn’t suppress any specific topic.
A recent California District Court ruling affirmed that Perfect 10’s ruling applied to the embedding of images from socialmedia onto third party websites. the user name and image, user caption, number of likes, and branding of the socialmedia platform). Amazon.com, Inc., What is Embedding?
The opinion holds that the key parts of Florida’s socialmedia censorship law (SB 7072) likely violate the First Amendment and should remain enjoined. ” The opinion also highlights the madness of the Fifth Circuit allowing the Texas socialmedia censorship law to take effect via a 1-line order. “S.B.
It covers some of the basics on open source AI focusing on its definition and legal challenges. The exact definition of what constitutes open source AI is still subject to discussion. Finally, the Open Source Initiative (OSI) is currently working on a definition for open source AI. Its “ Open Source AI Definition – draft v.
Ever since the massive explosion of content creation that gave rise to socialmedia, content creators worldwide have utilized embedding to showcase and link users to content that otherwise would not have been as readily accessible. This definition amended in the Act is now known as the “Transmit Clause.”
As noted above, the specific language is “CRTC is directed not to impose regulatory requirements on online undertakings in respect of programs of socialmedia creators, including podcasts”. A key definition is who qualifies as a “socialmedia creator”, since it is their content that is brought into the exclusion.
They go as far as to call for people to change their mindset about socialmedia before making the jump. The basic idea behind Mastodon is to create a decentralized social networking platform that no one entity control. Some Mastodon Basics. It can go a long way to preventing future headaches.
Instead, its submission indicates that wants all broadcasters (which given the law would include the CBC) to get an even bigger portion of the potential Bill C-18 revenues by expanding the definition of “journalist” to include everyone from sound and video engineers to researchers and fact checkers.
Between blogs, socialmedia, forums, YouTube and a million other sites, one doesn’t have to be in a writing profession to be a widely read author. In short, plagiarism is almost definitely on the rise, but it’s also much easier to detect. However, we live in an era where absolutely anyone can write and find an audience.
The bill regulates “socialmedia platforms,” defined as an “electronic medium” that allows “users to create, share, and view user?generated As they realize the bill’s implications, I’m hoping Minnesota parents will tell their Senators to scrap this effort. What The Bill Says. generated content.”
I thought the legality of embedding was definitively resolved when the Ninth Circuit reaffirmed the “server test” in the Hunley v. Townsquare Media, Inc., Lynk Media LLC v. 14, 2025) Fedun posted three videos to socialmedia and then assigned the copyrights to Lynk Media. 2025 WL 89191 (S.D.N.Y.
While there are far too many for any single list, here are 5 copyright stories that you should definitely watch in 2022. Several such cases are going on right now and, though we likely won’t see a definitive answer in 2022, it’s going to be a copyright story to watch. 1: The Copyright Small Claims Court.
A couple of years ago, Florida and Texas passed “socialmedia censorship” laws. The laws were not subtle–the bill titles literally told the world that the legislatures were censoring socialmedia. From a drafting standpoint, the laws were a mess.
By definition, the overview aims to identify foreign companies and policies that may hurt U.S. Trade Representative asks copyright holders to share input for its Special 301 Report. Based on these recommendations, which center around copyright and piracy problems, the USTR compiles an annual list of countries that deserve extra attention.
Judge Jed Rakoff of the Southern District of New York recently denied a motion to dismiss in a copyright dispute involving the unlicensed “embedding” of a socialmedia video. By: Proskauer - Minding Your Business
Here’s a common scenario on socialmedia for artists: You’re starting to grow a steady online following, but your audience isn’t commenting, liking or sharing your first few posts. So is it time to throw in the towel on socialmedia and focus on other marketing strategies? Wear your heart on your sleeve.
Unauthorized pages and posts on socialmedia can dilute a brand’s goodwill and reputation and confuse consumers. One of the most important strategies to tackle these issues is filing takedown requests with socialmedia and e-commerce platforms. And the worst part?
The French streaming site actively campaigns on socialmedia where it has booked some impressive results. That kind of socialmedia exposure is unprecedented for a pirate site and it definitely helped to get more viewers to the platform. TikTok Views. WishFlix nailed the first part of that equation.
Among other problems, the law dictates how “socialmedia platforms” can make their editorial decisions. Fortunately, a Florida federal judge blocked Florida’s socialmedia censorship law as unconstitutional. This is not unique to socialmedia.
A recent California District Court ruling affirmed that Perfect 10’s ruling applied to the embedding of images from socialmedia onto third party websites. the user name and image, user caption, number of likes, and branding of the socialmedia platform). Amazon.com, Inc., What is Embedding?
For example, a student could write an article for their school paper, post content on socialmedia and then turn in an assignment for their class, all three with different citation standards and norms. Plagiarism standards are inconsistent, and most people find themselves navigating several different standards on a daily basis.
What if you started using the brand name on socialmedia? And unfortunately, there are bad actors out there who might try to register domain names or other socialmedia names or just mimic what you’re doing. So if you’re using a brand name on socialmedia, now is a good time to protect it.
General Business Law Section 394-ccc, the 2022 law that requires socialmedia platforms to disclose their editorial policies towards “hateful conduct.” It is definitely counterintuitive to oppose transparency requirements due to our strong regulatory and social norms in favor of transparency.
The bill would mandate age verification technologies that the Privacy Commissioner of Canada says creates concern given missing safeguards , it establishes website blocking that government officials warn could undermine net neutrality and an open Internet, and its broad scope goes beyond pornography websites to include search and socialmedia.
Acting on a decree issued by the Public Prosecutor at the Court of Milan, 12 Italian nationals and one person of Albanian origins, living in several regions of Italy and Germany, were targeted on suspicion of operating socialmedia channels dedicated to pirate IPTV subscription sales/resales.
No doubt some media reports will take the ‘500,000 customers’ comment and run with it but nowhere here does it say that 500,000 lost access to one or more services. The problem is getting people to believe that the threats are real and not just another deterrent message that only applies to other people.
The vote has sparked heated debates on socialmedia, including mistaken insistence by some that the bill does not affect user content (it clearly does) or that it will censor what Canadians can say online (it will not). The government rejected it without offering a credible explanation. While Section 4.1
Since music today is so widely transacted online in socialmedia and music platforms, the way people search for it and find the music is via a brand name, and having a registration makes it much easier and cheaper to do take downs on music platforms. That is the definition of what a brand is.
Tim Pool, the Babylon Bee, and National Religious Broadcasters, which are (respectively): “a social networking app, an active socialmedia content creator, a satirical news website, and a nonpartisan association of Christian communicators.” The plaintiffs in this case are Minds, Inc.,
That can’t possibly meet the definition of common sense for many Canadians. A better approach would be to focus on providing parents with filtering software, so that they could better manage their kids’ Internet use and prevent access to content they deem inappropriate.
If the plaintiff seeks to hold the defendant liable for third-party content–definitely true in this case–the Lemmon ruling make it clear that a “negligent design” framing is still subject to Section 230, no matter how creatively or emphatically the plaintiff points to the service’s first-party design choices.
Ever since the massive explosion of content creation that gave rise to socialmedia, content creators worldwide have utilized embedding to showcase and link users to content that otherwise would not have been as readily accessible. This definition amended in the Act is now known as the “Transmit Clause.”
Though Bello’s actions definitely crossed an ethical line when it comes to reusing content, it’s not a copyright infringement that I can figure. There’s going to be a lot of new stuff coming to this space so, if you are new, take a minute and subscribe to the newsletter or follow us on socialmedia.
. “The law is full of definitions and categorizations of different providers of online ‘intermediary services,’ including ‘caching, mere conduit, hosting, online platforms, very large online platforms, and very large online search engines.
And believe it or not, nonprofits definitely need trademark protection. To the world on the internet and socialmedia and via newsletters that they might share updates with about their progress. Some of them are combating poverty and homelessness. Those are just some that come to mind today.
Yesterday, the Supreme Court granted the emergency application to restore the injunction against HB 20, Texas’ socialmedia censorship law. Everyone knows “socialmedia censorship” laws will require the Supreme Court’s review. ” I agree. ” Again with the Internet exceptionalism.
Watch UFC Free” These people also brazenly advertise on socialmedia platforms to attract viewers to their pirate websites, with slogans on socialmedia sites such as “Watch UFC Free,” McKnight notes. That includes those who register new accounts. law, but that’s not a given.
We organize all of the trending information in your field so you don't have to. Join 9,000+ users and stay up to date on the latest articles your peers are reading.
You know about us, now we want to get to know you!
Let's personalize your content
Let's get even more personalized
We recognize your account from another site in our network, please click 'Send Email' below to continue with verifying your account and setting a password.
Let's personalize your content