This site uses cookies to improve your experience. To help us insure we adhere to various privacy regulations, please select your country/region of residence. If you do not select a country, we will assume you are from the United States. Select your Cookie Settings or view our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Used for the proper function of the website
Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Strictly Necessary: Used for the proper function of the website
Performance/Analytics: Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
Socialmedia (aka Facebook) were not a part of the conversation. This raises the question: does the press publishers’ right apply to socialmedia? While socialmedia were not explicitly singled out, they seem to comfortably fall within the ISSP definition. Do socialmedia make content available?
I never blogged the dual state and federal rulings in the SocialMedia Addiction cases from last Fall. Because it was underdeveloped, the court tells the plaintiffs to try that theory again before the court will definitively rule on it. As a result, Zuckerberg’s personal liability might still be in play.
His probation conditions included this restriction: not knowingly post, display or transmit on socialmedia or through his cell phone any symbols or information that [he] knows to be, or that the Probation Officer informs [him] to be, gang-related. JT said the term “socialmedia” was impermissibly vague.
This is a case focusing on ownership of socialmedia accounts. See “ SocialMedia Ownership Disputes Part II: Bridal Wear Company Takes Back Control of Instagram Account from Ex-Employee ” and “ Another Confused Entry in the SocialMedia Account Ownership Jurisprudence–JLM v. (See Teamsters Loc.
Nicklen “urged his socialmedia followers to consider the ‘haunting’ and ‘soul-crushing scene’ and to take steps to mitigate the harms of climate change.” Unlike a parodic use, widespread adoption of the Sinclair Defendants’ use could overtake the market for Nicklen’s video. Breitbart News.
There are two critically important cases over “socialmedia addiction” pending in California state court and as an MDL in the federal Northern District of California. Today’s post focuses on the socialmedia defendants’ efforts to dismiss the parallel lawsuits by the school districts.
Utah’s Minor Protection in SocialMedia Act contains two major provisions. First, it requires socialmedia companies to conduct age assurance of their users to a 95% accuracy rate, along with an appellate process for misclassified users. Utah argued that the law doesn’t suppress any specific topic.
The categorization of socialmedia accounts into “business” and “personal” accounts was a hot issue a decade ago, when states across the country passed laws to protect employees from invasive employer demands to access or control their personal socialmedia accounts.
The opinion holds that the key parts of Florida’s socialmedia censorship law (SB 7072) likely violate the First Amendment and should remain enjoined. ” The opinion also highlights the madness of the Fifth Circuit allowing the Texas socialmedia censorship law to take effect via a 1-line order. “S.B.
I thought the legality of embedding was definitively resolved when the Ninth Circuit reaffirmed the “server test” in the Hunley v. Townsquare Media, Inc., Lynk Media LLC v. 14, 2025) Fedun posted three videos to socialmedia and then assigned the copyrights to Lynk Media. 2025 WL 89191 (S.D.N.Y.
It covers some of the basics on open source AI focusing on its definition and legal challenges. The exact definition of what constitutes open source AI is still subject to discussion. Finally, the Open Source Initiative (OSI) is currently working on a definition for open source AI. Its “ Open Source AI Definition – draft v.
Martillo claims that six socialmedia services suspended his accounts because he is an anti-Zionist. The court responds: “the defendants’ socialmedia platforms are not places of ‘public accommodation.’ Are SocialMedia Services “State Actors” or “Common Carriers”? ” Cites to Lewis v.
Marketing. * 2, 2022): Nor does personal jurisdiction arise out of the Film Defendants’ so-called “advertising strategy,” which allegedly “featured a significant push on socialmedia[ ] targeting Washington, DC residents via Instagram and Facebook.” targeted socialmedia advertising. Comptroller , No.
Ever since the massive explosion of content creation that gave rise to socialmedia, content creators worldwide have utilized embedding to showcase and link users to content that otherwise would not have been as readily accessible. This definition amended in the Act is now known as the “Transmit Clause.”
A couple of years ago, Florida and Texas passed “socialmedia censorship” laws. The laws were not subtle–the bill titles literally told the world that the legislatures were censoring socialmedia. NetChoice appeared first on Technology & Marketing Law Blog.
Instead, its submission indicates that wants all broadcasters (which given the law would include the CBC) to get an even bigger portion of the potential Bill C-18 revenues by expanding the definition of “journalist” to include everyone from sound and video engineers to researchers and fact checkers.
The bill regulates “socialmedia platforms,” defined as an “electronic medium” that allows “users to create, share, and view user?generated As they realize the bill’s implications, I’m hoping Minnesota parents will tell their Senators to scrap this effort. What The Bill Says. generated content.”
By 'Damola Adediji Policy researchers and government studies worldwide have continued to express deep concerns surrounding Big Tech firms and their extensive collection of personal digital data, which affects how markets operate and compete. These companies have established themselves as intermediaries in building multi-sidedmarket platforms.
The “Informed Consent Action Network,” and its founder Del Bigtree , ran afoul of the socialmedia services’ COVID misinformation policies. ICAN claimed that the socialmedia services took these actions due to government pressure and jawboning, especially pointing the finger at Rep.
Among other problems, the law dictates how “socialmedia platforms” can make their editorial decisions. Fortunately, a Florida federal judge blocked Florida’s socialmedia censorship law as unconstitutional. This is not unique to socialmedia.
Here’s a common scenario on socialmedia for artists: You’re starting to grow a steady online following, but your audience isn’t commenting, liking or sharing your first few posts. So is it time to throw in the towel on socialmedia and focus on other marketing strategies? Wear your heart on your sleeve.
General Business Law Section 394-ccc, the 2022 law that requires socialmedia platforms to disclose their editorial policies towards “hateful conduct.” It is definitely counterintuitive to oppose transparency requirements due to our strong regulatory and social norms in favor of transparency.
European Union Criticized For Complexity For the last two years, the European Commission has expended significant resources on two new pieces of legislation known as the Digital Markets Act (DMA) and the Digital Services Act (DSA).
Tim Pool, the Babylon Bee, and National Religious Broadcasters, which are (respectively): “a social networking app, an active socialmedia content creator, a satirical news website, and a nonpartisan association of Christian communicators.” Bonta appeared first on Technology & Marketing Law Blog.
If the plaintiff seeks to hold the defendant liable for third-party content–definitely true in this case–the Lemmon ruling make it clear that a “negligent design” framing is still subject to Section 230, no matter how creatively or emphatically the plaintiff points to the service’s first-party design choices.
Yesterday, the Supreme Court granted the emergency application to restore the injunction against HB 20, Texas’ socialmedia censorship law. Everyone knows “socialmedia censorship” laws will require the Supreme Court’s review. Paxton appeared first on Technology & Marketing Law Blog.
The TTAB upheld three refusal to register the proposed mark POSITIVE ONLINE PRESENCE for "Providing marketing consulting in the field of socialmedia." The Board took judicial notice of definitions of the words "marketing," "consulting," and "managing." And so, all three refusals were affirmed.
The IPKat has received and is pleased to publish another guest contribution by Danish Katfriends Jakob Plesner Mathiasen , Hanne Kirk and Thit Nymand Nisbeth (all Gorrissen Federspiel) tackling influencer marketing from an IP perspective. This emerging breed is - very tellingly - called influencer marketing.
Defendants also managed the socialmedia presence of the “La Baguette” business, which primarily consisted of a Facebook page. Moore, Find Out Who Your Friends Are: A Framework for Determining Whether Employees’ SocialMedia Followers Follow Them to A New Job, 39 CAMPBELL L. See generally, Christopher A.
Ever since the massive explosion of content creation that gave rise to socialmedia, content creators worldwide have utilized embedding to showcase and link users to content that otherwise would not have been as readily accessible. This definition amended in the Act is now known as the “Transmit Clause.”
Unfortunately, until we get a definitive Supreme Court ruling, these pro-censorship arguments will continue to swirl. Two More Courts Tell Litigants That SocialMedia Services Aren’t State Actors. Anti-Zionist Loses Lawsuit Over SocialMedia Account Suspensions–Martillo v. Newspaper Isn’t State Actor–Plotkin v.
To pick just one of many examples, the Commission is consulting on the meaning of “socialmedia service”: Q5. How should the Commission define “socialmedia service”? What, if any, criteria should be used to assess whether an online undertaking is providing a socialmedia service?
Good practices should be identified, and recommended to all actors, including e-commerce marketplaces, transport and logistic service providers, payment services providers, socialmedia providers, providers of domain name services, etc. Secondly, further cooperation and information sharing should be encouraged.
Today I’m blogging about one of those bills, California AB 2408 , “Socialmedia platform: child users: addiction.” This bill assumes that socialmedia platforms are intentionally addicting kids, so it creates business-ending liability to thwart those alleged addictions. What the Bill Says.
On the one hand, socialmedia has enabled global sharing of news and creative media. E: What advice would you give to fellow artists and makers on socialmedia on sharing their work? E: What would you like to see happen in terms of the culture of socialmedia artists and their followers?
Judging from the Rusty Krab’s marketing efforts and socialmedia promotion as detailed in Viacom’s complaint, the pop-up was far more focused on providing the backdrop for Instagram-worthy selfies than it was on producing edible food. The court then moves on to consider Viacom’s copyright infringement claim.
The court observed that there was no dispute that the product was "hugely successful, due in no small part to Plaintiffs’ extensive marketing efforts and the PRETZEL CRISPS trademark registration they received and have enforced to clear the field of similarly named products. The court did not rest its decision on that finding alone.
It looks like Jake from State Farm is definitely going to blow through his deductible, as the insurance giant lost its bid to declare game over on a lawsuit brought by video game publisher Atari Interactive. A screenshot from the (now deleted) socialmedia video at the center of the controversy.
On 22 February 2024, the UK Intellectual Property Office (UKIPO) released its report on “ The impact of complicit socialmedia influencers on male’s consumption of counterfeit goods in the UK ”. 24% of UK males aged 16 to 60 purchase counterfeit goods under the endorsement of socialmedia influencers.
This blog attempts to unravel these complexities and wrestle with the definitions of trademarks in the hybrid age while providing strategies for businesses to maneuver through this fluid arena. Global Enforcement: The key is working with local legal resources within crucial markets for protection of the brand.
Judge Rakoff: Embedding SocialMedia Content is a “Display” Under the Copyright Act. Court Definitively Rejects AFP’s Argument That Posting a Photo to Twitter Grants AFP a License to Freely Use It — AFP v. Instagram appeared first on Technology & Marketing Law Blog. Related posts. Breitbart News. United Sports.
The rulings should put a decisive end to the genre of lawsuits over socialmedia supporting terrorists; and the Twitter ruling will cast a negative shadow over other cases alleging that socialmedia services facilitate illegal activity. By definition, recommendations are never “passive” or “neutral.”
In the definition of John H. Online music platforms, such as on-demand content services or socialmedia platforms, created disparities in the remuneration of right-holders, creating the so-called “value gap”. Yet, argues Mazziotti, some issues remain unresolved, such as the market power of online gatekeepers.
The “has two main requirements: (1) a mechanism for socialmedia users to file complaints about instances of “hateful conduct” and (2) disclosure of the socialmedia network’s policy for how it will respond to any such complaints.” Law § 394-ccc.
We organize all of the trending information in your field so you don't have to. Join 9,000+ users and stay up to date on the latest articles your peers are reading.
You know about us, now we want to get to know you!
Let's personalize your content
Let's get even more personalized
We recognize your account from another site in our network, please click 'Send Email' below to continue with verifying your account and setting a password.
Let's personalize your content