This site uses cookies to improve your experience. To help us insure we adhere to various privacy regulations, please select your country/region of residence. If you do not select a country, we will assume you are from the United States. Select your Cookie Settings or view our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Used for the proper function of the website
Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Strictly Necessary: Used for the proper function of the website
Performance/Analytics: Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
This post continues the discussion, in particular in light of the revision of the Open Source AI Definition (OSAID) released at the end of 2024, a welcome step in clarifying and unifying this definition. The definition of open source in AI development has been the subject of heavy debate and scrutiny.
In the attached article , we examine some of the differences between these types of marketplaces and business models, highlight some of the varying license terms of these marketplaces and discuss why IP owners who license their IP for NFTs often are best served by developing their own licenses to be used in connection with sale of their NFTs.
3) What is the effect of open source licenses on the AI model that uses only some open source components? (4) It covers some of the basics on open source AI focusing on its definition and legal challenges. MIT License or Apache License ) to less permissive licenses (e.g. GNU GPL or the BSD license ).
To that end, they found a generic photo of a syringe that was licensed under a Creative Commons license. Since the license only required attribution, the paper added the photo and included the photographer’s name in the caption. Unfortunately, Creative Commons Licenses are more complex than that.
According to their press release, LicenseGuard searches the internet looking for Dreamstime user images that are not licensed. Rather than sending a demand for settlement, LicenseGuard offers a special version of their regular stock image license that covers post-usage permission. A Softer Touch. It’s impossible to know.
When you publish content on your site that you did not either create yourself or license yourself, you’re trusting that the person who gave it to you sourced it both legally and ethically. But, even if they have permission to use it, that license may not extend to the people that purchase the theme. The Business Issue.
That said, streamers did get some minor victories, as other royalty rates have been capped and the definition of “family plans” has reverted to an earlier definition that was more favorable to them. The 3 Count Logo was created by Justin Goff and is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License.
In its judgment Hasco TM v EUIPO - Esi (NATURCAPS) , the General Court dealt with the question whether such regulatory definitions play a role in interpreting the meaning of a term in the list of goods and services. Picture is by Krysten Merriman and is used under licensing terms of Pexels. 2(a) of Directive 2002/46/EC ).
According to the lawsuit, the two companies used the photograph “ColdCutAsst040” on their websites despite not having a license to do so. The version of the movie released is a high definition edition from Europe, which isn’t as high of quality as some had hoped. As such, the company to sue for copyright infringement.
In addition, there are concerns that many stock photography sites provide limited licenses to users and many unwittingly overstep them. Read the License Carefully – Make sure you fully understand the license, the terms of it and what is expected of you.
I thought the legality of embedding was definitively resolved when the Ninth Circuit reaffirmed the “server test” in the Hunley v. With respect to the Jordan video, I assume the video was infringing when uploaded to Twitter, which is why a license argument wouldn’t work. Townsquare Media, Inc., 2025 WL 89191 (S.D.N.Y.
We analyzed the legal definition and common structure of cross-border pharmaceutical licensing transaction in our article of Anatomy of Pharmaceutical Licensing, Development and Commercialization Transaction in China (I), we also discussed some key legal provisions of pharmaceutical licensing agreement. Please see full.
This is where the concept of compulsory licensing gains popular attention. What is Compulsory Licensing? Where it is known as compulsory licensing in reference to patents, it is known as statutory licenses in reference to copyright and related rights. Reasons for Granting Compulsory License.
However, he claims that LEGO responded claiming that they had an implied license to use the jacket as part of their set. The Widevine app makes it possible for users to download high definition video from various streaming platforms. As a result, he sent a cease-and-desist letter to LEGO.
The case involves ShutterStock, a photo licensing service. (We ShutterStock has a “contributor” program that allows anyone to upload photos into their licensing database in exchange for a fee if licensed. Only 2 visitors saw the subject image in ShutterStock’s database and neither licensed it.
Here's what Paolo writes: 'Can't Be Evil' NFT license – A tentative NFT worldwide license standard by Paolo Maria Gangi Can't Be Evil. Universal license - a set of NFT CC licenses under the name 'Can’t Be Evil'. Why a CC license?
During the evening of April 5, Belgian media reported that a major blocking campaign was underway to protect content licensed by DAZN and 12th Player, most likely football matches from Belgium’s Pro League. DAZN described the action as the the first of its kind and a real step forward in the fight against content piracy.
Although Nautilus made it easier for a court to find claim terms indefinite, the Federal Circuit continues indicate that the definiteness test strongly favors validity. In Niazi Licensing Corp. ” Definiteness is ordinarily a question of law and so the Federal Circuit reviews the issue de novo on appeal. by Dennis Crouch.
This is largely achieved through the use of Creative Commons licenses. These licenses make the work available for reuse and sharing, provided the original author(s) are attributed and the exact terms of the license are followed. Gratis articles are free to view, but there is no clear license to allow or encourage reuse.
However, since VPNs are commonly used as a way to ensure privacy while engaging in pirate activities, it could definitely have impacts there. The 3 Count Logo was created by Justin Goff and is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License. According to the Indian government, the new policy takes effect June 27.
Copyright Licensing of Digital Assets Attached to NFT Sales. Bonus: Free Open Source Copyright License for NFT sales below]. What are the terms by which you are selling the NFT and licensing your work, the art you put into the platform that’s going to be attached to the NFT? NFT Copyright Licensing.
According to the court, ACT would be unlikely to prove copyrightability in the phrasing of a every definition but that, in aggregate, they deserved protection. The 3 Count Logo was created by Justin Goff and is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License.
Key Challenges in AI and IPR: Ambiguity in Legal Definitions: The various steps carried out in the training processes of AI do not conform to legal categories of reproduction, use or making. That is, when utilizing images on websites, there may be a conflict of rights regarding the reproduction of those pictures.
Perhaps a logical example might see a pirate site dressed up as Netflix, but streaming pirated content rather than the fully-licensed content users paid for. Unfortunately that logical example fails to help here due to a confusing clash of definitions in the study.
Such conduct generated exploitative effects by excessive pricing towards users as well as exclusionary effects towards SGAE’s competitors, representing a barrier to entry into the market for collective management as well as the market for licensing of copyright-protected works for other CMOs or independent management entities (IMEs).
However, this is something of a misnomer as the letter can be customized to send demands for payment, offer a license for legitimate use or a demand to remove the work. Anything that isn’t clear is likely explained in the “Learn” section, which provides definitions for key terms. The first is sending a cease and desist letter.
Recently, the Delaware Chancery Court and the Third Circuit issued three significant decisions on key issues affecting licensing and M&A transactions in the life sciences industry. By: Goodwin
He claims that third party “contributors” uploaded his copyrighted photos to ShutterStock as part of ShutterStock’s licensing program. Specifically, McGucken claims that a total of 337 images were uploaded, of which 165 were downloaded and that led to 938 licenses. Stored at a User’s Direction. Those arguments go nowhere.
With the onset of the trend wherein users are gradually switching to online streaming to meet their music needs and discarding traditional methods such as radio, television, and music CDs, compulsory licensing for the internet was recognized as a key policy issue by the music industry last year. Background. The Plaintiff, Tips Industries Ltd.,
Misinterpreting Licenses: Incorrectly assuming permission to use copyrighted material. What Is Accidental Copyright Infringement. 2024 Update) Accidental copyright infringement occurs when someone unknowingly violates copyright law. This can happen due to: Lack of Understanding: Not fully comprehending copyright laws and regulations.
The “Platform Policy” appears to grant a broad license to users of the API. While the definition of “Platform” includes “content,” it doesn’t appear to contain “User Content.”. The court flags that the parties did not submit any new evidence on the issue of whether Instagram intended a license. For example. Breitbart News.
Last year, the 11th Circuit took a look at the idea that there was an implied license for RSS scraping and found that there was none. This case is not a broad license for others to scrape publicly available content for whatever purpose they deem fit. However, the Ninth Circuit’s ruling doesn’t really change that. Bottom Line.
IPRS is a copyright society which is responsible for licensing and managing rights on behalf of music composers, publishers, and authors. The monopolistic power of these societies gives them considerable power in licensing and royalty distribution for their sector, impacting businesses, the public at large, and other stakeholders.
Previously, we wrote about how alleged concerns of “hold-up” and a lack of “transparency”, two non-legal terms without accepted definitions, are being used to advocate for special rules applicable to patents subject to declarations regarding Fair, Reasonable and Non-Discriminatory (FRAND) licensing.
This makes it great for classrooms, corporate environments and anywhere else where licensing for distribution might have been a problem. While there are definitely reasons that many creators outside the United States may want to register with the U.S. Copyright Office. perspective. Copyright Office, it’s a fairly niche issue.
Victory operates as Brough Brothers, which claims it was the first African American owned bourbon distillery in the Commonwealth of Kentucky, with the requisite licenses to operate a distillery by September 2020. The statements at issue didnt claim to have a distillers license and permit.
So, here we have three alternative definitions of lawful access. This definition appears to follow the CJEUs line of reasoning in the Svensson and VG Bild Kunst cases. The legal basis here is still the consent, but we could refer here to an objectified consent of the right holder to have authorised the free access to the work.
However, at the same time, it suggests that piracy is not by definition linked to fewer sales, or less legal activity. — A copy of the paper, published under a Creative Commons license (CC BY 4.0) — A copy of the paper, published under a Creative Commons license (CC BY 4.0) is available here. is available here.
In this post, I’ll take up one of the largest alternatives to traditional negotiation of licenses or permissions as a way that bloggers and other creators can manage their copyright rights, the Creative Commons (CC) suite of licenses. CC licenses are not per se “online only” but they are impractical offline.) With more than 1.4
8 This definition of the right could loosely be used as a definitionof machine-learning when applied to the creation of literary and artistic productions because AI machines can produce literary and artistic content (output) that is almost necessarily “based upon”a dataset consisting of preexisting works. 17 U.S.C. § ↩︎ See id. ↩︎ See Jane C.
Section 33 and Business of granting licenses through Copyright Societies. But I went through the 4th edition (page 248) which provides for a similar definition. The definition relied on by the Madras High Court focuses on the ‘enterprise’ aspect only. Going by this definition, an individual can never run a business.
In 2013, Constellation acquired perpetual, irrevocable, and exclusive license rights in the Corona marks, which gave Constellation the right to sell products under the Corona trademark. Constellation disagrees with Modelo’s position that hard seltzers are not allowed under its license.
For the moment, the actual contributions from Internet streaming services are ignored, an updated definition of Canadian content doesn’t exist, commercial success is irrelevant, and subsidies for the news operations of companies such as Bell and Rogers are encouraged.
It issues licenses for the communication to the public of cinematographic works on the basis of § 22 of the German Copyright Act. It being so, Citadines would exercise its lawfully licensed rights to cable retransmission, on the basis of a licence with another German CMO, GEMA, which manages such rights. public film screening).
We organize all of the trending information in your field so you don't have to. Join 9,000+ users and stay up to date on the latest articles your peers are reading.
You know about us, now we want to get to know you!
Let's personalize your content
Let's get even more personalized
We recognize your account from another site in our network, please click 'Send Email' below to continue with verifying your account and setting a password.
Let's personalize your content