Remove Definition Remove Designs Remove Marketing
article thumbnail

Industrial Design under The Design Act, 2000

IP and Legal Filings

The Designs Act, 2000 (“the Act”), is a complete code in itself and protection under it is totally statutory in nature. It protects the visual design of objects that are not purely utilitarian. Designs are registered in different classes as per the Locarno Agreement. These classes are mainly function oriented.

Designs 81
article thumbnail

Capturing All the Dimensions: Intellectual Property Protection for 3-D Designs and 3-D Printing Methods

More Than Your Mark

At its core, 3-D printing uses computer code in a computer-aided design (CAD) file to instruct specially designed printers to print three-dimensional physical objects one layer at a time. If you have invented a 3-D printed product or have a new printing process, remember to consult an intellectual property lawyer before marketing it.

Insiders

Sign Up for our Newsletter

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

Trending Sources

article thumbnail

NFTs Were Never About Copyright

Plagiarism Today

Though there are definitely ways that NFTs and blockchain technology can be useful for handling copyright issues , especially in countries where copyright registration is not required, it should not shock anyone that NFTs, as they exist today, aren’t the path. However, NFTs were never designed for this purpose.

Copyright 234
article thumbnail

An Interview Regarding AB 2273/the California Age-Appropriate Design Code (AADC)

Technology & Marketing Law Blog

Can the existing UK Age-Appropriate Design Code tell us anything about what AB 2273 might look like in practice? The bill’s winners are few and far between, and definitely not the constituents that the California legislature should be trying to help. I did a media interview regarding AB 2273 that I thought was worth sharing here.

Designs 111
article thumbnail

Snapchat May Have a Duty Not to Design Dangerous Software–Maynard v. Snap

Technology & Marketing Law Blog

It will also inspire plaintiffs to bring more negligent design claims against Internet services–a looming tsunami of litigation. The Ninth Circuit reversed, saying that the plaintiffs could plead around Section 230 by alleging defective design. I’ve blogged that case three times as well, in Feb. What the Court Said.

Designs 97
article thumbnail

Comments on the Ruling Declaring California’s Age-Appropriate Design Code (AADC) Unconstitutional–NetChoice v. Bonta

Technology & Marketing Law Blog

We’ve seen a flood of terrible Internet laws in the past few years, including the California Age-Appropriate Design Code (AADC). Because the AADC adopts the same definition of “business” as the CCPA/CPRA, this ruling highlights that any speech restrictions in those laws remain vulnerable to a constitutional attack. Kuklinski v.

Designs 109
article thumbnail

Does the cumulation of IP-rights undermine the effectiveness of the Repair Clause in the Design Directive?

Kluwer Copyright Blog

This choice may be influenced by the design of the product, the cost of repair or available repairers. One of these measures is the proposal to amend the Design Directive by including a specific repair clause for design protection. Design rights provide protection to the appearance of a (part of a) product.

Designs 78