Plagiarism Today
SEPTEMBER 15, 2021
In short, it’s claiming that Chegg, in many cases, either directly copies the content or creates a thinly veiled derivative work based upon it, both of which are violations of copyright law. Pearson alleges that this takes place both in text and video format in the service.
Kluwer Copyright Blog
JUNE 5, 2023
Many copyright professionals had hoped that the Court’s Goldsmith decision would articulate a workable standard for distinguishing transformative fair uses from infringing derivative works. After all, many derivative works (say, a movie made from a novel) will add something new and convey some new meanings or messages.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Plagiarism Today
AUGUST 29, 2022
SA: This means “share alike” and allows others to create derivative works based on the original, but any derivative must be licensed under the same terms. ND: This means “no derivatives” which bars the creation of derivative works. These four variables can be strung together to create a license.
Plagiarism Today
SEPTEMBER 14, 2022
Many artists have found their work in the libraries of different AI systems and have expressed anger over it. Though every AI is different in how it operates, some feel that AIs are not creating new works, but creating derivative works based on existing images. Whether that is true under the law has not been tested.
Copyright Lately
AUGUST 10, 2021
In a 91-page report and recommendation, a magistrate judge finds that the new version of the Philadelphia Phillies’ mascot falls within the “derivative works exception” to copyright termination. The law permits the owner of a derivative work prepared before termination to continue using that new work even after termination.
IPilogue
NOVEMBER 8, 2021
By using and copying Pearson’s original creative content to make answer sets based on that content, Chegg infringes Pearson’s exclusive rights as a copyholder, including the rights of reproduction, preparation of derivative works, and distribution.” . This complaint will definitely be one to follow. Under the U.S.
Copyright Lately
JANUARY 23, 2023
Instead, the lawsuit is premised upon a much more sweeping and bold assertion—namely that every image that’s output by these AI tools is necessarily an unlawful and infringing “derivative work” based on the billions of copyrighted images used to train the models. The Copyright Act Definition is Broad, But.
Expert insights. Personalized for you.
250 
Let's personalize your content