This site uses cookies to improve your experience. To help us insure we adhere to various privacy regulations, please select your country/region of residence. If you do not select a country, we will assume you are from the United States. Select your Cookie Settings or view our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Used for the proper function of the website
Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Strictly Necessary: Used for the proper function of the website
Performance/Analytics: Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
But for anyone who had expected the Data Act to include a revision of the Database Directive — an ambition that the Commission had signalled in both the 2020 Data Strategy and the 2020 IntellectualProperty Action Plan — the final proposal will be a major disappointment. A right that shall not be exercised.
This Kat is pleased to review the “ Overlapping IntellectualPropertyrights ”, edited by Neil Wilkof [full disclosure: a member of the IPKat team], Shamnad Basheer, and Irene Calboli (OUP, 2023, 864 pp.). He also explains the history of why utility models never became an EU-wide right.
This case relates to the sui generis databaseright and its application to the activity of search engines. UKIPO, UK’s future exhaustion of intellectualpropertyrights regime. CJEU judgments and AG Opinions. CV-Online Latvia, Court of Justice, Case C ?762/19. You can read a comment on the case here.
While the report outlines CISAC’s legislative lobbying actions in several countries to promote stronger laws protecting creators and rightsholders, it also pinpoints growing digital royalties and stronger laws safeguarding creators’ rights as top priorities. EU IntellectualProperty Office, 2022 IP Youth Scoreboard. Stay tuned!
We organize all of the trending information in your field so you don't have to. Join 9,000+ users and stay up to date on the latest articles your peers are reading.
You know about us, now we want to get to know you!
Let's personalize your content
Let's get even more personalized
We recognize your account from another site in our network, please click 'Send Email' below to continue with verifying your account and setting a password.
Let's personalize your content