This site uses cookies to improve your experience. To help us insure we adhere to various privacy regulations, please select your country/region of residence. If you do not select a country, we will assume you are from the United States. Select your Cookie Settings or view our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Used for the proper function of the website
Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Strictly Necessary: Used for the proper function of the website
Performance/Analytics: Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
TM – Unregistered mark, used with products and tangle items. SM – Unregistered servicemark, used with services. For more, see my video: The post Which trademark or copyright symbol do I use? appeared first on Erik M Pelton & Associates, PLLC.
Text Copyright John L. TTABlogger comment: The Board distinguished the "100% THAT B H" case, where "much of the evidence of third-party use specifically [sought] to associate the goods … with Lizzo." Here, the third-party evidence made no reference to the applicant. Welch 2024.
The Board affirmed refusals to register the product design shown below as a trademark for acupressure mats and pillows, and as a servicemark for retail store services featuring those goods, finding that the product shape lacked acquired distinctiveness as a trademark and failed to function as a servicemark.
Applicant’s incorporation of her organization, application for tax-exempt status and registration of her domain name did not accord her servicemark rights. What is the first use date for the restaurant's services? Text Copyright John L. See Stawski v. Lawson , 129 USPQ2d 1036, 1045 (TTAB 2018) (citing Brookfield Comms.,
Intellectual property law includes patents, trademarks, copyrights, and trade secrets and is an important consideration for any new business. This article will address trademarks and copyrights, but the law firm of TraskBritt can assist with any intellectual property law needs. Trademarks and copyrights offer different protections.
As readers of Velocity of Content know, the US has had a copyright statute on the books since 1790, following closely on the heels of the (then) freshly minted copyright and patent clause in the Constitution. Copyright Office, after what amounts to a much lighter review process. Unlike copyrights and patents, U.S.
In a less than enlightening decision, the Board affirmed a refusal to register the proposed mark shown below as a servicemark for "casinos" and "hotel, restaurant and bar services," finding that the mark "is not an inherently distinctive source identifier and therefore, fails to function as a servicemark for Applicants services."
Yesterday, it was all about key developments in the copyright field in the Africa IP Highlights 2023 – the result of collaboration between myself and several IP practitioners and researchers across Africa: Clarisse Mideva ; Rita Chindah ; and Jessie Mgonga. Today, it’s about the trade marks.
“become ordained” or “become a minister,” is strong evidence that Applicant’s consumers will perceive “get ordained” not as a servicemark but rather for the commonly understood meaning of the words. Its intent that the phrase function as a servicemark is irrelevant. Text Copyright John L. Welch 2022.
1] The Copyright Act protects certain types of works, which are included in Section 13. 13 (1) states that original literary, dramatic, musical, and artistic works as well as cinematograph films and sound recordings are protected by copyright. regarding the copyright for the film “De Dhakka.”
Section 4 of the Trademark Act provides for registration of a collective membership mark, defined as a trademark or servicemark adopted by a collective and used by members to indicate membership in the collective. Text Copyright John L. Emphasis by the Board]. Welch 2023.
The Trade Mark [sic] Act is not an act to register words but to register trademarks. Before there can be registrability, there must be a trademark (or a servicemark) and, unless words have been so used, they cannot qualify for registration." Text Copyright John L. In re Renaissance Jewelry New York, Inc. Serial Nos.
In the spring and summer of 2022, following the international sanctions imposed upon Russia after its invasion of Ukraine, Russia introduced several landmark changes to its IP law, most notably to patent, trademark and copyright laws. Is anything here on the list? Similar logic has been recently applied by the Kirov Region Commercial Court.
There is no such thing as an “international copyright” that will automatically protect an author’s writings throughout the world. The Philippines is a member of several international copyright treaties and conventions and offers copyright protection to foreign works in accordance with these treaties. Conclusion.
Sections 1, 2, 3, and 45 of the Lanham Act provide the statutory basis for a refusal to register subject matter that does not function as a trademark or servicemark. A threshold question in evaluating the registrability of a trademark or servicemark is whether the proposed mark meets the source indication requirement.
Recently, Armenia, Belarus, Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan and Russia have made a collective endeavor to move towards the formation of a regional system dealing with trade marks, servicemarks and appellations of origin of goods in the Eurasian Economic Union (EAEU). Marques provided an explanation of how it will work.
Trademark Law: A powerful branding program that combines a strong trademark or servicemark and a memorable advertising and marketing campaign. Copyright Law: An important and original work of authorship, in the literary, musical, visual, dramatic or other arts. Nominees can be individuals, groups or corporations.
This is clear from the third-party servicemark, trade name and descriptive uses discussed above, and from Applicant’s prior Supplemental Register registration, as well as her disclaimer of “SOLAR” and Section 2(f) claim in her original application. Text Copyright John L. And so, the Board affirmed the refusal to register.
The Board observed that "where the proposed mark is not inherently distinctive because it is comprised of common features in the relevant field or is typically used or perceived as ornamentation, length of use alone generally is not sufficient to satisfy the elevated burden of proving acquired distinctiveness." Text Copyright John L.
Boston Suburban allegedly continued to use the “Logan Car Service” mark in online keyword advertising and in metatags, and continued to copy customer reviews from Boston Carriage’s website and publish them on online review platforms.
The print-on-demand service at issue is Pixels, who has appeared on this blog before. The plaintiff paints fish, has a trademark in his name, “DeYoung,” and has registered copyrights. Redbubble * Zazzle Loses Copyright Jury Verdict, and That’s Bad News for Print-on-Demand Publishers–Greg Young Publishing v.
Here Opposer Barnard relied on his alleged common law servicemark rights, claiming that he had used the mark prior to applicant's filing date (its constructive first use date) of March 26, 2019. Would he need to show significant exposure of the mark in terms of website visits and the like? Text Copyright John L.
COLORADO mark in commerce as of the filing date of the underlying application because it had not yet rendered any pageant services under the mark, and that any prior use under the license inured to the benefit of the licensor, not to Abundance. Rendering services requires actual provision of services.”
Here are three recent TTAB rulings, each sustaining an opposition based upon non-use of the opposed servicemark. For a servicemark, the services must be rendered in order to qualify as "use in commerce" as defined in Section 45 of the Lanham Act. Don't try to register a use-less mark? Welch 2024.
Regarding the IPR matters, Cambodia has issued the following legal documents: • Law concerning Marks, Trade Name and Acts of Unfair Competition dated January 8, 2002; • Law on Patents, Utility Model Certificates and Industrial Designs, in force since January 2003; • Law on Copyright and Related Right, in force since March 2003.
Trademark Law: A powerful branding program that combines a strong trademark or servicemark and a memorable advertising and marketing campaign. Copyright Law: An important and original work of authorship, in the literary, musical, visual, dramatic or other arts. Nominees can be individuals, groups or corporations.
Sections 1, 2, 3, and 45 of the Trademark Act provide the statutory basis for a refusal to register subject matter that fails to function as a servicemark. “[N]ot The applied-for marks, even if they do appear on the same page, denote a character in that television series, and do not indicate the source of the services.
As we note above, some third-party uses are servicemark uses. TTABlogger comment: NB: The fact that the phrase appears on the sewn-in label does not by itself make it a mark. Text Copyright John L. Others are titles of books, or emblazoned in an ornamental manner on t-shirts or artwork. One Wholesaler, Inc. Welch 2023.
It can be done under the following grounds: -the Registrant’s domain name is identical to or similar to a name, trademark, or servicemark in which the Complainant has ownership; -the Registrant has no entitlement or legitimate interests in the web domain; and. Servicemark and trademark holders must be granted civil recourse.
The question, then, was "whether, as a matter of law, online retail store or mail order activities featuring only a party’s own goods are 'services' as contemplated in the Trademark Act." The Trademark Act defines "servicemark" but does not define "services." Text Copyright John L. citing Giant Food Inc.
The fact that TMRR created the mark two years earlier and "promoted the mark" in seeking an entity that would offer the services does not mean it owned the mark. Text Copyright John L. 3d 1023, 123 USPQ2d 1024, 1028 (Fed. Read comments and post your comment here. Welch 2022.
The Board affirmed a failure-to-function refusal to register WHEN THERE ARE NINE , in standard character form, as a servicemark for "providing educational scholarships." may influence how the [mark] is perceived.’” The Board noted that the applicant used the phrase in the manner of a servicemark, but that begs the question.
However, this transformation has significant challenges, such as counterfeiting, trademark infringement , and unauthorized use of copyright contents, faced by the rights holder and the creator, particularly in the domain of intellectual property rights (IPR). The Copyright Act, 1957: Under the said act, S. 51 and 52, along with S.
The appellate court noted that a party may try to show that it acquired proprietary rights in a mark as a result of “prior use analogous to trademark or servicemark use.” The court therefore affirmed the "cancellation of Appellant's mark." Actually, registrations are cancelled, not marks - ed. Welch 2023.
91075090, 1989 TTAB LEXIS 6, at *3 (TTAB 1989) (“[T]he mere acceptance of specimens by the Examining Attorney does not mandate a finding by us that servicemark usage was made.”). Text Copyright John L. The Board therefore affirmed the decisions to cancel the subject registrations. Read comments and post your comment here.
The Board affirmed a refusal to register the proposed mark WE’RE HERE TO HELP WITH YOUR LEGAL NEEDS! finding that the phrase fails to function as a servicemark for "legal services." Text Copyright John L. In re Richard M. And so, the Board affirmed the refusal under Sections 1, 2, 3 and 45 of the Trademark Act.
The group owns the servicemark. Text Copyright John L. The Board also considered, for the sake of completeness, Stott's claim that he was not just the manager, but the "primary, non-performing member" of the group. Read comments and post your comment here. TTABlogger comment: One is tempted to call this a WYHO? Welch 2024.
The distinction between trade name use and either trademark or servicemark use is often a difficult one to make and often is nebulous in character.” Refusal seems as inevitable as a Caitlin Clark three-pointer Text Copyright John L. See , e.g. , In re Letica Corp. , 226 USPQ 276, 277 (TTAB 1985). 192 USPQ 165, 167 (TTAB 1976).
The Board was not impressed by this showing: Although this evidence is relevant, it does not establish Respondent’s lack of use of its mark for a three-year period. Text Copyright John L. TTABlogger comment: At a minimum, petitioner should have moved to compel discovery responses. Welch 2021.
The Board pointed out that "[t]he addition of a generic or highly descriptive term does not necessarily detract from the separate commercial impression created by the mark APPLE alone." Text Copyright John L. And so, the Board denied the petition for cancellation. Read comments and post your comment here. Welch 2024.
Section 3 states that servicemarks are registrable "in the same manner and with the same effect as trademarks." Section 45 defines a "trademark" and a "servicemark" as something that identifies and distinguishes goods and services from those of others. Text Copyright John L. Welch 2022.
It rejected Di-Namic's argument that the proposed mark is not being used merely as a song title, but also to signify that it offers musical composition services as a logical prerequisite of the musical composition being licensed. Text Copyright John L. Read comments and post your comment here. TTABlogger comment: WYHA?
We organize all of the trending information in your field so you don't have to. Join 9,000+ users and stay up to date on the latest articles your peers are reading.
You know about us, now we want to get to know you!
Let's personalize your content
Let's get even more personalized
We recognize your account from another site in our network, please click 'Send Email' below to continue with verifying your account and setting a password.
Let's personalize your content