This site uses cookies to improve your experience. To help us insure we adhere to various privacy regulations, please select your country/region of residence. If you do not select a country, we will assume you are from the United States. Select your Cookie Settings or view our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Used for the proper function of the website
Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Strictly Necessary: Used for the proper function of the website
Performance/Analytics: Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
In India, personality rights are not formally recognised. However, the twin concepts of privacy and publicity rights are gradually evolving through judicial interpretations. The issue of safeguarding personality rights has grown in prominence because of the rising exploitation of various celebrities and renowned individuals.
THE ART OF TATTOOING AND COPYRIGHT Tattoos are protected by copyrightlaws as original works of art. When a tattoo design is created and inked onto skin, it automatically gains copyright protection. This means the tattoo artist holds the exclusive rights to reproduce, distribute, and display the design.
Topics include access and substantial similarity, fair use, performers’ rights, moralrights, expert testimony, the role of lay listeners, sound sampling, as demonstrated in dispositions of litigated and settled infringement disputes. pre-publication event: EULAs: Friends or Foes?,
These uncanny and exact replications of celebrity voices and visuals lead to a world of problems not just from a privacy point of view, but in general IP as well. However, this may prove difficult as in the case of granting the author rights, the moralrights provided under Section 57 of the Act are nearly impossible to enforce.
are typically objected to on the grounds of personality rights (publicity rights, celebrity rights, by other names), privacy and (to a limited extent) defamation. Such treatment usually amounts to violations of the moralrights of the author.
In the US, a voice isn’t explicitly protected under copyrightlaw, but there are potential protections under the right of publicity, which is enforced through state laws related to the appropriation of likeness, name, and voice. Legal precedents like Midler v.
Gaon also considers no-authorship possibilities as alternative rights models, such as ‘author in law’ and AI moralrights. It considers the paths that AI authorship may take in the future, and explores possible candidates for authorship in the AI creation process (e.g., the programmer, the user, or the AI itself).
While the Constitution does not explicitly mention personality rights, In the case of Judge K.S. Union of India [1] , established that privacy is an essential Fundamental right under Article 21 of the Constitution. Privacy is the entitlement to be free from intrusion and and is a continuation of personal freedom.
The second edition offers revised, or wholly rewritten chapters to the overlaps discussed in the first edition so as to reflect recent developments, as well as to include new chapters (the overlap between privacy and copyrightlaw; privacy and secrecy; trademarks certification marks and collective marks; and IP and traditional knowledge).
Moderator: Martin Senftleben, University of Amsterdam CopyrightLaw and/or/vs. a ‘Brussels Effect’ for the Digital Services Act Jennifer Urban, Berkeley Law School The Brussels Effect claim is descriptive, not predictive—can it apply to the DSA? Bradford’s four examples of the Brussels Effect v.
We organize all of the trending information in your field so you don't have to. Join 9,000+ users and stay up to date on the latest articles your peers are reading.
You know about us, now we want to get to know you!
Let's personalize your content
Let's get even more personalized
We recognize your account from another site in our network, please click 'Send Email' below to continue with verifying your account and setting a password.
Let's personalize your content