Copyright Law Intellectual Property Law Inventor 
Kluwer Copyright Blog
MARCH 11, 2025
This change of paradigm endangers the implicit dogma that copyright law shall ultimately serve access to culture in the long term. Furthermore, in a dematerialized reality of access to copyright-protected works, it is also important to safeguard the necessary balance between copyright protection and the public domain.
The IPKat
FEBRUARY 16, 2024
This is a book review of Teaching Intellectual Property Law: Strategy and Management edited by Sabine Jacques, Associate Professor in Information Technology, Media and Intellectual Property Law, University of East Anglia Law School and Ruth Soetendorp, Visiting Academic, City University of London and Professor Emerita, Bournemouth University.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
IP and Legal Filings
AUGUST 4, 2022
Intellectual property rights are statutory rights given to creators, inventors, and artists. The purpose of Intellectual Property Rights is to ensure that sufficient recognition is given to the creator’s work and skills, subsequently stimulating innovation and creativity in the country.
IIPRD
MAY 9, 2024
This has led to the introduction of intellectual property rights which are a set of exclusionary rights as it excludes the world from enjoying a set of rights arising out an invention or creation, except the inventor or creator. College: LC-1, Faculty of Law, Delhi University [1] The Patents Act, 1970, No.
IIPRD
JANUARY 7, 2025
One of the main areas of intellectual property law development is the link between artificial intelligence and intellectual property rights (IPRs). Growing AI-related business activity, early case law, and legislative and international policy activities are making it more and more relevant in practice.
The IPKat
OCTOBER 10, 2021
Copyright The Journal of Intellectual Property Law and Practice published an Author's Take piece considering what the way forward for the press publishers' right might be under EU copyright law. This Kat is having a haunted October This post promises to take readers around the IP blogs in eight posts.
IPilogue
JULY 9, 2021
Professor David Vaver is a Member of IP Osgoode’s Advisory Board and a Professor of Intellectual Property Law at Osgoode Hall Law School. . v Hologic, Inc., 594 US (2021). Some understanding of these rules, and where they differ between countries, is therefore desirable. 5] Cheerio, n 1 at 220; Minerva , n 2 at 5-7. [6]
Expert insights. Personalized for you.
105 
Let's personalize your content