This site uses cookies to improve your experience. To help us insure we adhere to various privacy regulations, please select your country/region of residence. If you do not select a country, we will assume you are from the United States. Select your Cookie Settings or view our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Used for the proper function of the website
Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Strictly Necessary: Used for the proper function of the website
Performance/Analytics: Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
First off today, Andrew Albanese at Publishers Weekly Reports that a collection of publishers and authors have secured a default judgement against a piracy service named KISS Library, this one awarding them $7.8 Copyright Law, works lapse into the publicdomain on January First of the year their copyright expires.
First off today, Gene Maddaus at Variety reports that Senator Josh Hawley has introduced a bill that aims to drastically rewrite copyright law in the United States, rolling back the term of copyright to just 28 years with the option for renewal for another 28. Let me know via Twitter @plagiarismtoday.
First off today, Bevan Hurley at The Independent reports that former White House photographer Pete Souza says that he is facing legal threats over his use of a photograph he took on his own website. Second, since he was a federal employee at the time the image was taken, the work itself is in the publicdomain.
All this raises a simple question: Did the series copy St Onge’s work? Onge and others who spotted the similarities, someone who worked on the series closely copied or even traced St. And despite copying my video, the episode still contains several errors, like saying the Orlando version has 2 ride systems while showing 4.
That changed two years ago when the video platform launched its first-ever transparency report. 826 Million YouTube’s latest transparency report reveals that during the second half of last year, rightsholders claimed more than 826 million videos on YouTube. A TV company claimed the publicdomain footage as their own.
A few days ago The IPKat reported on the injunction issued by the Rome Court of First Instance regarding the unauthorized minting of NFTs from a trade mark perspective. As a result, also the exclusive rights of adaptation (covered by Spanish law) and public communication are involved in this matter.
The company has refused to share reporter’s notes and other information, as this would be overbroad and too burdensome. In addition, the Times pointed out that much of the information sought by OpenAI is protected by the reporter’s privilege. The New York Times is not happy with this approach.
2] While most Sherlock Holmes stories are now in the publicdomain, the estate alleged that some works and character elements regarding Sherlock Holmes are still protected by copyright. [3] 18] Netflix admitted it had access to and copied the memoir. [19] 5] Netflix and the estate quickly settled. [6].
These enforcement efforts aren’t limited to Books3 either, or the English language for that matter; earlier this week anti-piracy group BREIN reported that it helped to remove a Dutch language dataset. Second, whether making copies of the books is fair use. The authors clearly have a different take. Trial in Two years…?
Earlier highlighted by the Reporters Collective , and now by a viral video uploaded by YouTuber Mohak Mangal (with more than 6 million views as of 30 May 2025), an aggressive ANI business strategy that has been targeted towards several creators is in the news. Who gets to report news, and why is this relevant for copyright and free speech?
Last week we reported that a San Francisco law firm acting for Japanese publisher Shueisha had filed an ex parte application at a California district court. A declaration filed with the court by Shueisha ( pdf ) contains a copy of Cloudflare’s response to the DMCA subpoena filed earlier this year.
They further claimed that any similarities that did exist were derivative of Irish folk songs such as Danny Boy (aka Londonderry Air ), which was in the publicdomain. Before turning to the differences in the expert witness reports, the district court examined the legal framework for a copyright infringement claim.
The issue has already made its way to the courts in several instances and a few weeks ago we reported that anti-piracy groups are also getting involved. Last month, the Danish Rights Alliance was the first group to claim a major victory on the takedown front, by removing a copy of the controversial Books3 AI training dataset from the web.
Originality is the quality that distinguishes produced or invented works from copies, clones, forgeries, or derivative works by being new or novel. Eventually, a publication featuring sixteen of the forty-two matriculation papers was released by the University Tutorial Publishing Limited. specialised in regional phone directories.
Copies of his images also appeared on other websites, again without the metadata. A Bloomberg Law report says the Eleventh Circuit adopted a “heightened standard” towards CMI, with Trace Jackson, an intellectual property attorney at Rogers Towers, offering his understanding of what that means.
The New York Times reported on Dr. Martin Luther King’s copyright lawsuit over “I Have a Dream” in 1963. Shortly after his “I Have a Dream” speech was delivered in August 1963, King moved for a preliminary injunction preventing record companies from selling copies of the speech. Martin Luther King, Jr. Mister Maestro.
The mapping of national legal sources of copyright flexibilities and their comparative analysis provided a detailed overview of the state of the art of copyright flexibilities in all the 27 Member States, organized in 27 national reports which illustrated national provisions using the same taxonomy applied to EU sources.
The mapping produced a wealth of data and findings, which are systematized in a dataset available on the user-friendly website www.copyrightflexibilities.eu , and analyzed in a report downloadable from Zenodo , SSRN or ResearchGate , entitled “Copyright Flexibilities: Mapping and Comparative Assessment of EU and National Sources”.
Specifically, a group called Spice DAO purchased an NFT displaying a copy of filmmaker Alejandro Jodorowsky’s ‘Dune’ for $3 million, assuming it would grant them the ability to produce derivative works, such as an animated Dune series. TSPs are natural or legal persons responsible for the validation and security of digital signatures.
When humans read books, we do not make copies of themwe understand and internalize concepts. AI systems, on the other hand, must make actual copies of worksoften obtained without permission or payment encode them into their architecture and maintain these encoded versions to function.
It may not always prevent unauthorized copying; however, it may serve as a public notice by securing a public record in one’s favor. The extent of use of such content: whether the entire content is being copied or a specific excerpt relevant to the purpose (teaching, commenting, etc.) is being utilized?
In a report published in September 2022, I undertook research into the national implementations of these two provisions in 11 Member States : Austria, Denmark, Estonia, France, Germany, Hungary, Ireland, Italy, Malta, the Netherlands and Spain. The report was commissioned by C4C , but written in complete academic independence.
book publishers, rejecting the Internet Archive’s argument that its practice of scanning and lending digital copies of books qualifies as fair use under the Copyright Act. When the electronic version is “checked out,” the physical copy is taken out of circulation. ” What is Controlled Digital Lending?
The EU took the Intellectual Property route by introducing a related right under its copy right law. It is introduced with intension to correct the market failure which presumes that allowing the author’s work to be copied freely discourages the author to create, innovate or invest.
According to a report by Markets and Markets, the cryptocurrency market is expected to grow from USD 1.6 According to a report by Business Insider, more than half of the 100 largest banks in the world have already invested in crypto and blockchain-based companies. billion in 2021 to USD 2.2
The course packs were copied and typically sold as an alternative to course textbooks. Copyright lobby groups and their supporters have long claimed that the practice relies on fair dealing and that universities are profiting from copying without compensation.
This was understood in the very first patent statute of 1623 and also discussed in the Tek Chand and Ayyangar Committee Reports. UoI and this co-authored report by Prof. Interestingly, this has been described as a method to reduce the burden on patent applicants since this information is already available in the publicdomain.
Significant amounts of content are also available through the publicdomain. According to this report , open models accounted for 31% of articles, reviews and conference papers in 2021. law, copying copyrighted content to train AI can state a cause of action for infringement [Citing, Thomson Reuters Enters. 529 F.Supp.3d
For e.g., copyright does not actually protect a particular physical copy of the book or its pdf file, rather, it protects what lies inside it. . They didn’t need permission to borrow from the public corpus or publicdomain. Definitely, I will not like somebody copying it without my permission. smug smile ).
Here the final version is a clear improvement over the original Parliament text as it no longer suggests that model providers need to distinguish between copyright-protected and publicdomain training materials and then apply different transparency standards to both, which would be unworkable.
Also, the national examiners most often follow the Search Report conducted in the International Phase. A copy of the international application is required only if the applicant has not received Form PCT/IB/308 and the Patent Office have not received a copy of the international application from the International Bureau under PCT Article 20.
Also, the national examiners most often follow the Search Report conducted in the International Phase. A copy of the international application is required only if the applicant has not received Form PCT/IB/308 and the Patent Office have not received a copy of the international application from the International Bureau under PCT Article 20.
Genius planted tiny mistakes in some of the lyrics it posted, and once those appeared in Google’s information boxes, it argued that Google copied lyrics from Genius. Genius’s “browsewrap,” however, prohibits copying for commercial use, and Genius sued Google for breach of contract.
In a 2016 report, Marci Goldberg of K-12 Market Advisors reported that “teachers spend an average of five hours per week creating materials and seven hours per week searching for materials.” Exceptions include materials in the publicdomain such as documents and materials the U.S. I am not alone.
Indeed, on the eve of the announcement to shutter the company, it is reported that Book Depository was selling 20 million books annually in more than 160 countries. The distribution of books was no less crucial than the means of copying and reproduction. Picture on upper right by Anomie, who has released it into the publkic domain.
They further claimed that any similarities that did exist were derivative of Irish folk songs such as Danny Boy (aka Londonderry Air ), which was in the publicdomain. Before turning to the differences in the expert witness reports, the district court examined the legal framework for a copyright infringement claim.
filed an application to place additional documents on record, before framing the issues, against the defendants, ARG Outlier Media Pvt Ltd, which also included the examination reports of the Registry and the responses by the defendants regarding trademark/taglines that are the subject matter of the suit.
Copyright is essentially a right to copy. It’s an intellectual property, if an individual owns the copyright to something, then he’s the only owner of it and also the decider that who can copy it. A standard myth about the Internet is that anything posted online can be copied or downloaded. Image source:Gettyimages].
The court via its previous order dated August 22, 2022 had directed Domain Name Registrars to disclose the name of the impugned domain names. However, it was reported that a few DNR are not giving effect to the injunction orders passed by the court. Hindustan Unilever Limited v.
Other Posts World of Possibilities: Single Judge Bench of Delhi High Court Allows Use of Celebrity Information Available in PublicDomain Delhi High Court specifies some contours of publicity rights in India! Deadline for the Applications: 11:59pm IST, 23rd June, 2023.
The special audit report should be submitted to the Reserve. Bank of India with a copy to the banking company. After conducting the inspection of the books, accounts and records of the banking company a copy of the inspection report to be furnished to. auditor to conduct the special audit. banking company.
The UPCKat trying to keep confidential information confidential in the UPC As part of our UPCKat reporting on the latest UPC developments, the IPKat brings readers a roundup of how the UPC is treating confidentiality and third party access to court documents. Timing Rule 262A.3
Designed to be freely available licensed or publicdomain; we occasionally use fair use images where no free image is available, such as when a famous work has been destroyed. Wikimedia Foundation, Jacob Rogers: DMCA compliance lead for 7 years. Careful justifications/written record when we make those exceptions.
But I will describe what happened when I read a few news reports describing the outcome in Morford v. For a court, that process means “’dissect[ing] the allegedly copied [work’s] structure and isolate each level of abstraction contained within it.’” ’” Id. Newman , 959 F.3d ’” Id.
We organize all of the trending information in your field so you don't have to. Join 9,000+ users and stay up to date on the latest articles your peers are reading.
You know about us, now we want to get to know you!
Let's personalize your content
Let's get even more personalized
We recognize your account from another site in our network, please click 'Send Email' below to continue with verifying your account and setting a password.
Let's personalize your content