article thumbnail

DeivanArt Expanding System for Detecting Copied Images

Plagiarism Today

We’ve seen mass litigation efforts, commonly referred to as “copyright troll” operations , speculative invoicing and much more. The post DeivanArt Expanding System for Detecting Copied Images appeared first on Plagiarism Today. It makes sense to start with it and then look at alternatives only if it is not meeting all your needs.

Copying 264
article thumbnail

AI Litigation Insights

JD Supra Law

Plaintiffs are large news media corporations that allege that Perplexity AI illegally copied their content, By: Eversheds Sutherland (US) LLP . - Plaintiffs Dow Jones and Company, Inc. and NYP Holdings, Inc., Perplexity AI), a San Francisco-based artificial intelligence company.

Insiders

Sign Up for our Newsletter

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

article thumbnail

A Quick Journey Through the Expanding World of AI and Copyright Litigation

Velocity of Content

Just three short years ago, copyright litigation discussions centered around whether it is fair use to copy declaring code or make unlicensed use of Lynn Goldsmiths photographs of Prince. Some of them are class action lawsuits, which are not very common in copyright land (though not unheard ofremember the Google Books litigation ?)

article thumbnail

[Guest post] Litigation commenced against the developers of AI image generation software

The IPKat

Katfriends Adrian Aronsson-Storrier and Oliver Fairhurst from Lewis Silkin report on recent litigation in the UK against the developers of AI generation software. This litigation has arisen amongst a flurry of recent interest in AI generated works. temporary copy which is; 2. What is AI image generation software?

article thumbnail

Record Labels: ‘Hisses & Crackles’ Are No License to Copy & Digitize Old Records

TorrentFreak

The Internet Archive is widely known for its Wayback Machine, which preserves copies of the web for future generations. “Defendants have created a massive online storefront providing digital copies of thousands of these protected sound recordings to anyone to stream or download for free. .

Copying 123
article thumbnail

Taking Stock of ANI vs OpenAI Copyright Litigation- Part II

SpicyIP

Additionally, it has also been pointed out that the storage of copies for training purposes itself might fall under Section 52(1)(b)(c) if the copying is transient or incidental. In conclusion, ANI vs OpenAI litigation opens up a vast canvas of questions that will shape the future of GenAI and Copyright law in India.

article thumbnail

Taking Stock of ANI vs OpenAI Copyright Litigation- Part I

SpicyIP

As perhaps all readers are aware by now, the GenAI Copyright litigations have made their presence known in India. Figure 1: Issues as framed by the Court (Para 25) In addition to these issues framed by the Court, I would like to highlight two additional contentions that may play out in this litigation. 52(1)(a)(iii).