Remove Copying Remove Fair Use Remove Government Remove Social Media
article thumbnail

"TM-compliant" ads not shown to be nominative fair use

43(B)log

Plaintiff WATL is allegedly the preeminent governing body and league for the sport of axe throwing and uses the trademark “WATL” to market and publicize the axe throwing league. First, nominative fair use permits only the “truthful use of a mark.” Cold Steel Inc., 2023 WL 2372059, No. 2:20−cv−11407 JAK (Ex) (C.D.

article thumbnail

Digitalization And Copyright Law

IP and Legal Filings

Digital Era And Copyright Infringement- Issues Easy Accessibility Online Now days the use of internet and online based systems has increased manifolds and it is no more a complex task to gather or collect any data from the internet. Case Laws The first case in this regard is UTV Software Communication Limited v.

Insiders

Sign Up for our Newsletter

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

article thumbnail

Plagiarism as a Social Norm

Plagiarism Today

In some types of programming, especially when there’s only one correct way to do something, copying code isn’t just a shortcut, it’s the norm. Many lawyers also copy and paste heavily in the legal documents in a bid to meet the criteria there. The reason for this is simple: Plagiarism is governed by social norms.

article thumbnail

Generative AI: the US class action against Google Bard (and other AI tools) for web scraping

Kluwer Copyright Blog

The defendants’ wholesale collection and use of copyrighted material, with no option for copyright owners to opt out, would exceed the legal interpretation of “fair use” (see VHT vs Zillow Group , 918 F.3d 2000) (“ copying an entire work militates against a finding of fair use. ”). 4th 1149 (9th Cir.

Fair Use 132
article thumbnail

Ninth Circuit Reaffirms the “Server Test” for Direct Infringement of the Public Display Right — Hunley v. Instagram, LLC (Guest Blog Post)

Technology & Marketing Law Blog

By Guest Blogger Tyler Ochoa Recently, the Ninth Circuit reaffirmed what has become known as the “server test”: in order to be held directly liable for violating the public display right, the alleged infringer must have a fixed “copy” of the work stored on a server in its possession or control. Instagram, LLC , 2023 WL 4554649 (9th Cir.

article thumbnail

AI and copyright in 2022

Kluwer Copyright Blog

In 2022 the UK Government responded to a consultation over whether to alter the UK provisions for computer-generated works (CGWs) and determined to leave them alone, concluding “There is no evidence at present that protection for CGWs is harmful, and the use of AI is still in its early stages.

Copyright 145
article thumbnail

Book review: Copyright in the street. An Oral History of Creative Processes in Street Art and Graffiti Subcultures

The IPKat

However, readers seeking to understand the principles governing the application of copyright to this type of work will not be satisfied only with this book. Would they be prepared to take legal action for copyright infringement if someone exploited or copied one of their works? Another important question is raised in this chapter.

Art 56