This site uses cookies to improve your experience. To help us insure we adhere to various privacy regulations, please select your country/region of residence. If you do not select a country, we will assume you are from the United States. Select your Cookie Settings or view our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Used for the proper function of the website
Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Strictly Necessary: Used for the proper function of the website
Performance/Analytics: Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
It frustrates me that people turn to me when they’re copied, assuming this is the kind of work I’m engaged in doing, when they’ve never consulted me before about their IP. Although I engaged a designer for my “branding”, all I essentially got from the expensive exercise was a logo, and a website.
Workshop on ‘Patent Opposition in the Pharmaceutical Field’ [Kochi, April 24-28] We are pleased to announce that the Inter-University Centre for IPR Studies (IUCIPRS), CUSAT, and Third World Network are jointly organizing the 4th edition of their workshop on ‘Patent Opposition in the Pharmaceutical Field’ between April 24-28, 2023.
An ongoing study on copyright and new technologies included a workshop organized by DG-CNECT (the responsible “ministry” at the Commission) in June. On the subject of longstanding disputes and eagerly awaited judgements, the Supreme Court of Canada heard oral arguments in May in the case of Access Copyright v. York University.
We held a series of workshops during which we gradually developed a survey that would cover a wide range of copyright exceptions. For instance, the category for libraries includes the question of whether the exception allowed unauthorized reproduction to provide copies for other libraries. Temporary Copies for Technological Processes.
It states that the current IP regime poses problems in the context of generic computer programs because of the way the algorithms are designed and trained using large data sets. They receive inputs at various stages of their development – be it designing the software, training the system and testing how it functions.
If you create a new electronic device in your Texas workshop, it may be possible to patent it. This means that it may not possible for people or companies to copy your idea whether those parties are based in Texas or in another country. Design patents are intended to protect intellectual property related to how an object looks.
If you create a new electronic device in your Texas workshop, it may be possible to patent it. This means that it may not possible for people or companies to copy your idea whether those parties are based in Texas or in another country. Design patents are intended to protect intellectual property related to how an object looks.
The content is based on research presented at the Fifth Annual Workshop on Intellectual Property Rights in Szeged in April 2021, offering perspectives that are pertinent for those involved in the ongoing discourse around international IP law. The final part addresses IP harmonization in the context of other emerging technologies.
Hannah knew early on that intellectual property protection needed to be a fundamental part of her business plan. “I attended an IP workshop to get some practical business advice. Then we've got registered designs for our Toddle design, and for our magic mist bottle, which has stood us in really good stead. “We also have trade secrets.
It recently held a workshop where academics and regulators addressed the issue. At the workshop, legal scholars, economists, and policy experts reviewed the current state of the law and economic literature on non-compete clauses in contracts between employers and employees.
We informed our reader about a workshop on ‘Patent Oppositions in the Pharmaceutical Field’ organized by IUCIPRS, CUSAT, and Third World Network from December 4- 8, 2022 in Kochi, Kerala. It is worth noting that the above order was passed, despite the Defendant’s plea that it has not received any copy of the Plaint and other documents.
It recently held a workshop where academics and regulators addressed the issue. At the workshop, legal scholars, economists, and policy experts reviewed the current state of the law and economic literature on non-compete clauses in contracts between employers and employees.
While branding may also be important, especially with larger, established companies, trademark protection is generally less critical because it may protect the name, but does not prevent competitors from copying the function or form of a medical device. Medical devices are patentable in India with certain caveats.
There can be very few clothes designers who can create bespoke pants for every shape and size, from your youngest cousin to your grandad. But Dundee-based designer, Deborah, does exactly that as she sells clothes from sizes XXS to 6XL. She protects her designs from copycat products using intellectual property rights.
against Kabushiki Kaisha Studio Ghibli’s application to register the EU figurative mark 18 193 928 designating various goods and services in classes 9, 14, 16, 18, 20, 21, 24, 25, 26, 28, 34 and 41. Designs Anna Maria Stein reported on a recent EUIPO Board of Appeal (BoA) decision.
Additionally, a recent Third Circuit decision held that copying is not the only method that trade secret plaintiffs can demonstrate actionable “use” under the Defend Trade Secrets Act. Most often, restrictive covenants are designed to prevent a departing employee from competing with his/her former employer for clients or business.
Additionally, a recent Third Circuit decision held that copying is not the only method that trade secret plaintiffs can demonstrate actionable “use” under the Defend Trade Secrets Act. Most often, restrictive covenants are designed to prevent a departing employee from competing with his/her former employer for clients or business.
We organize all of the trending information in your field so you don't have to. Join 9,000+ users and stay up to date on the latest articles your peers are reading.
You know about us, now we want to get to know you!
Let's personalize your content
Let's get even more personalized
We recognize your account from another site in our network, please click 'Send Email' below to continue with verifying your account and setting a password.
Let's personalize your content