Remove Copying Remove Designs Remove False Advertising
article thumbnail

False Patent Marking as False Advertising: Overcoming Dastar

Patently-O

Dawgs’ (“Dawgs”) counterclaim for false advertising under the Lanham Act. This case began back in 2006 when Crocs sued Double Diamond and others for patent infringement of Crocs’s design patents. Crocs largely prevailed in those actions. 1125(a)(1)(B) (Section 43 of the Lanham Act).

article thumbnail

Griper’s Keyword Ads May Constitute False Advertising (Huh?)–LoanStreet v. Troia

Technology & Marketing Law Blog

” I’ll focus on the false designation of origin claim regarding Troia’s keyword ads. And how can consumers be “diverted” with the ad copy accurately previewed what consumers could expect to get at the link terminus? Defendant cannot now hide under the cloak of cyberspace to escape liability.”

Insiders

Sign Up for our Newsletter

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

article thumbnail

Section 230 Helps Amazon Defeat False Advertising Lawsuit Over Printer Ink Cartridges–Planet Green v. Amazon

Technology & Marketing Law Blog

The court simply responds: “the Ninth Circuit has held that Section 230 immunity applies to false advertising claims and other claims that are based on purportedly false representations.” Section 230 more clearly applies to third-party ad copy than to the resulting sales. See, e.g., the cited Ynfante v.

article thumbnail

false advertising as a workaround when municipal codes are copied?

43(B)log

It allegedly sold or gave away unauthorized copies of the I-Codes and Custom Codes to both customers and prospective customers. Finally, UpCodes allegedly falsely claimed to be the “only source” of state amendments integrated into the model code, when in fact ICC also offers custom codes on its website. UpCodes, Inc.,

article thumbnail

false advertising doesn't get around Dastar without some direct statements

43(B)log

Wolf Designs LLC v. Five 18 Designs LLC, F.Supp.3d 18, 2022) Wolf designs and installs “vehicle wraps,” large vinyl graphics or decals applied to car bodies. Copyright: Three of Wolf’s customers allegedly opted to hire Five 18 to install vehicle wraps featuring designs Wolf owned. But what about false advertising?

article thumbnail

unexplained "3x more cutting power" could be false advertising when comparator was unexpected

43(B)log

Most of the claims failed on summary judgment, but part of Woodland’s claim against Fiskars for false advertising, based on Fiskars’s statements about the cutting power of its tools, and some of its statements that certain products were designed in the United States, did create factual issues for trial.

article thumbnail

when weak TM claims do better than seemingly strong false advertising claims

43(B)log

May 20, 2024) Note: A jury found Kaijet liable for design patent and copyright infringement after this opinion, but rejected the TM claims, which I guess says something about a jury’s ability to distinguish claims. Email communications repeatedly referenced Sanho’s design, and expressed a desire to use similar elements in its own product.