This site uses cookies to improve your experience. To help us insure we adhere to various privacy regulations, please select your country/region of residence. If you do not select a country, we will assume you are from the United States. Select your Cookie Settings or view our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Used for the proper function of the website
Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Strictly Necessary: Used for the proper function of the website
Performance/Analytics: Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
One such legal issues is what is referred to as “fairuse,” which becomes particularly problematic in the context of the copyright law. Thus, fundamental questions arise, such as whether such copying amounts to infringement under copyright law or whether it falls under the purview of fairuse.
Ross Intelligence will get plenty of second looks from courts deciding fairuse in generative AI copyright cases. Those were some of the phrases legal commentators used to describe Andy Warhol Foundation for the Visual Arts v. Goldsmith in the days following the Supreme Courts 2023 landmark fairuse decision.
11, 2025) examined three essential questions, 1) were the Westlaw headnotes and key number system taxonomy protected by copyright, 2) did Rosss copying of the headnotes to create legal memos used to train Rosss AI system infringe copyright, subject to the defense of fairuse, and 3) was Ross copyingfairuse.…
Misinterpreting Licenses: Incorrectly assuming permission to use copyrighted material. FairUse Misconception: Believing that a particular use falls under fairuse guidelines. Preventing Accidental Infringement: Respect Copyright: Avoid copying others’ work without permission.
The Court has granted summary judgment in respect of 2,830 headnotes belonging to Thomson Reuters and admittedly used by Ross Intelligence to train its Natural Language Processing and Artificial Enabled Legal Research tool, finding Direct Copyright Infringement and rejecting fairuse. But, first, Some History!
Five things to know about the Supreme Court’s new purpose-driven fairuse opinion in Andy Warhol Foundation v. Goldsmith (“ Warhol “) is that relatively rare fairuse case in which both the original and follow-on works were more or less directly competing in the same market. Andy Warhol Foundation v.
Some of McFree’s critical videos use copyrighted material owned by Watch Tower so in 2018, the group filed an application for a DMCA subpoena which asked a court to compel YouTube/Google to hand over his details. ” FairUse Considerations. Overall then, the first factor weighs in favor of fairuse.
This is what I call a “commercial editorial use”–ad-supported editorial content. Courts routinely split on whether commercial editorial use is commercial for fairuse purposes. The ridiculously low economic stakes of this case are what the CCB was designed to handle. Amount Taken.
As lawsuits mount against AI companies over copyright infringement – most recently with Dow Jones and NY Post suing Perplexity AI for “massive illegal copying,” Microsoft’s CEO Satya Nadella calls for more flexible copyright laws. ” This analogy fundamentally mischaracterizes how LLMs work.
In a January 2024 report and recommendation later adopted by the court , the magistrate judge found that the repost infringed the plaintiff’s display right simply because it shows a copy of the photo on Chicken Joes social media account. FairUse Declawed. For that reason, Prepared Food Photos v. Netflix, Inc.
[A surprising ruling from Judge Bibas (sitting as a district court judge by designation) in the Thompson Reuters v. 4) I disagree with the court’s application of the fairuse transformative standard. Ross case, because he reverses himself on numerous points (all in favor of the copyright owner).
The AI copyright and fairuse trial in Thomson Reuters v. On Friday, August 23, jurors are scheduled to hear opening statements in the first trial to test whether using copyrighted data to train an AI program qualifies as fairuse. Ross Intelligence may not be glamorous, but it will be groundbreaking.
Costumes are considered “useful articles” and, similar to most of the fashion industry , does not qualify for any kind of copyright protection. . First, design elements that are “physically or conceptually separate” from the article can be protected. However, commercial use of costumes still raises legal questions.
She’s actually listed as a witness for both sides: Sedlik plans to call Von D to testify regarding the copying of his photograph and her use of the resulting Miles Davis tattoo on social media. She’ll also testify that she had no reason to believe that using a photo as a tattoo could constitute copyright infringement.
Its TOS provide that users will not use Roblox content outside of the Roblox Platform, monetize Roblox content, or imply an association with Roblox for their businesses outside of the Roblox Platform. Wowwee sells a line of dolls called “My Avastars,” which plaintiffs allege were “copied directly from Roblox’s Classic Avatars.”
At trial, American focused primarily on its trademark infringement and unfair competition claims, arguing that Skiplagged misled consumers by making itself appear like an authorized agent of the airline, in part by using American’s logo in ways that could cause confusion. Here, the jury sided with the airline, awarding $4.7
Finding Google’s copying a fairuse, the Supreme Court ended Oracle’s decade-long attempt to recover copyright damages. The battle began between these tech giants when Google designed its Android software platform for mobile devices, such as smartphones.
In May, State Farm filed a motion to dismiss the lawsuit (read here) , arguing that Atari was “seeking a windfall for the inadvertent and fleeting use of a decades-old arcade game.” The FairUse Defense The court also denied State Farm’s motion to dismiss Atari’s copyright claim based on the fairuse defense.
The claim is sprinkled with the most obvious reason: the Canadian media companies want a settlement that involves OpenAI paying licence fees for the inclusion of their content in its large language models and the lawsuit is designed to kickstart negotiations. This isn’t me speculating.
Copyright Infringement/FairUse. The Crony graphic appeared as the video’s thumbnail image and in the video’s first 10 seconds, so it was not a de minimis use. The Crony graphic also doesn’t qualify for fairuse: Nature of Use. Multimedia System Design , 2021 WL 3271829 (S.D.N.Y.
According to the Authors Alliance, IA’s digital ebook library is a prime example of a service that should be permitted to operate as fairuse, as it benefits both writers and readers. Instead of allowing libraries to own copies, they have to license them, which makes it impossible to add them to the permanent archive.
” With respect to whether Babybus’ baby character infringed Moonbug’s baby, Babybus claimed that the alleged copying related to generic features found in nature. . Day to Day Imports. * Satirical Depiction in YouTube Video Gets Rough Treatment in Court. * 512(f) Preempts Tortious Interference Claim–Copy Me That v.
Say No to Copycats: Letting others know your content is protected deters them from copying it. Copyright Protection: Protect your original works like photos, videos, and posts, so you can freely distribute and exploit them, but others will need your permission or a license to use it, unless “fairuse” applies.
The 1976 Act was the first major revision of US copyright law since the 1909 Act , which was passed during the era of Mark Twain, ragtime, player pianos, and early silent films. Harper & Row brought suit and The Nation argued that publishing the excerpts was a fairuse.
Despite a number of solid affirmative defenses—including implied license, de minimis use and waiver—the jury was only asked to determine whether defendants had proven that their conduct qualified as a fairuse under the Copyright Act. Skull arm design. Bible verse design. Upper back design. Tribal design.
That’s by design–the DMCA was designed to resolve matters outside of court. Now, imagine the rightsowner also overclaimed trade dress protection for its sage leave design. Heldman. * Another 512(f) Claim Fails–Ningbo Mizhihe v Doe. * Video Excerpts Qualify as FairUse (and Another 512(f) Claim Fails)–Hughes v.
On May 18, 2023, the Supreme Court found that artistic changes to a pre-existing work, alone, not necessarily sufficient to make a derivative work fairuse. copyright law, the Supreme Court focused on the actual use made, i.e. what the user does with the original work. copyright law. Copyright law in the U.S.
As the parties wait in their respective corners for the opening bell to ring, here’s what you need to know: Alexander Has Already Established Ownership and Copying. Skull arm design. Bible verse design. Upper back design. Tribal design. Implied License and FairUse Are the Key Remaining Defenses.
If restrictions are placed on the fairuse defense and/or a compulsory licensing regime implemented for models that used copyrighted content, such restrictions might apply to computer vision models that enable surgical robotics and autonomous vehicles. AI authorship rules apply regardless of the nature of the claimant.
This post will focus on another key issue from the case – the relevance of logos in design patent infringement analysis. Still, ornamental logos found on the accused product can still be relevant as visual distractors in the process of evaluating similarities and differences between the claimed design and accused design.
Celebrities may collaborate on designing the product. Glynn Lunney: Examples in the US seem to fall under common regimes—what about where the law clearly doesn’t cover the use, such as use of a photo on the cover of a magazine when there’s reporting about the subject. You can cluster fairuse cases.
Alexander claimed that Take-Two Interactive infringed the tattoo designs she inked on her client, professional wrestler Randy Orton, when the company produced and distributed a video game featuring a realistic in-game depiction of Orton. Oracle , which stressed the trial judge’s role in the ultimate fairuse determination.
This principle is key for podcasters, as it means that if Podcaster A accuses Podcaster B of copying their interview format, the claim would likely fail because formats and factual content are not copyrightable. Additionally, if the use does not harm the market value of the original work, it is more likely to be considered fairuse.
A new lawsuit over Broadway’s Stereophonic tests copyright’s limits, as Fleetwood Mac’s former sound engineer claims the hit play copies his real-life story about working on the Rumours album. The set of Stereophonic , which Caillat claims mirrors the vantage point he described in Making Rumours.
The precedent work is “a set of replacement stickers for the dashboard climate controls for certain GM vehicles”: The Copyright Office registered this design. Defendant had not obtained the Deposit Design from the Copyright Office. Defendant had not tried to find out why Amazon kept reinstating Plaintiff’s listing.
Those arguments were that (1) Take-Two’s use of the tattoos was authorized by an implied license, (2) the fairuse doctrine insulates their utilization of the tattoos and (3) the tattoos constitute a de minimis part of the video game. The District Court also found that the use was not fairuse.
Most parties agree that it’s impossible to design an error-free takedown process but disagree on what error rate is acceptable when takedowns are automated. Opponents of filtering technology warn that fairuse and First Amendment rights are at stake. Tweaking the DMCA.
The Legal Stuff The De Minimis Defense As I’ve discussed before , there’s a whole doctrine with a fancy Latin name reserved for situations in which copying is insignificant enough to fall below the threshold of substantial similarity— de minimis non curat lex (“The law does not concern itself with trifles.”) The Gap, Inc.
Many people were disappointed when the most-watched copyright case of the past 10 years, Oracle’s lawsuit against Google over Google’s copying Java application programming interface (API) code, failed to yield better guidance on the scope of copyright protection for computer programs. Many Internet pundits have interpreted Oracle v.
The lawsuit was brought James’ Designworks, an aggressive litigant that has brought many similar lawsuits over alleged infringement of its floor plans and home designs. This sends the case back to the district court where other defenses, most notably fairuse, will have to be weighed next.
The future of “controlled digital lending” is in doubt after a court rules that the Internet Archive’s online library is not protected by fairuse. When the electronic version is “checked out,” the physical copy is taken out of circulation. ” What is Controlled Digital Lending?
While these sorts of objects typically aren’t themselves eligible for copyright protection, they often contain pictures or designs which are protectable. Section 113(c) would also allow me to use my photos in a blog post talking about how I flipped the t-shirts for a profit because Alyssa priced them too low. Vila’s Claim.
These include restrictions on the number of copies that can be made by a legitimate user, specification of particular softwares/devices that may be used to access the content, encryption, etc. DRM refers to strategies and tools employed to safeguard copyrighted digital content from being shared, sold, accessed illegally.
We organize all of the trending information in your field so you don't have to. Join 9,000+ users and stay up to date on the latest articles your peers are reading.
You know about us, now we want to get to know you!
Let's personalize your content
Let's get even more personalized
We recognize your account from another site in our network, please click 'Send Email' below to continue with verifying your account and setting a password.
Let's personalize your content