The IPKat
MAY 18, 2024
Analysing the body of evidence produced by Mr T ( i.e. pictures showing him photographing the young girl featured in the still, an email, an attestation from third parties, a digital copy of the short film ), the TJ held that the litigious image was part of “ Rêve d’enfants ”, created before its exploitation by the school. 131-2 and L.
IP Whiteboard
AUGUST 30, 2020
From some general Google searching, it seems common for people to download pictures of works they like and bring them to their tattooist to copy. According to Dr Marie Hadley from University of Newcastle: My unpublished research among tattooists in New Zealand suggests there can be a lot of pressure from clients to copy existing images. “I
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
JIPEL Copyright Blog
NOVEMBER 30, 2021
As artists increasingly express themselves through NFTs, will their moral rights be protected? Some might argue that the rationales behind the existence of moral rights preclude their application to NFTs. It is not possible to say whether our present assumptions about NFTs and moral rights will hold water in the future.
Kluwer Copyright Blog
DECEMBER 5, 2022
When the said sensor recognizes it is in front of the Ara Pacis, it gives the order to copy the colored reproductions of some parts of the Ara Pacis, stored in a cloud-based database, and display them on the screen of the goggles. When copyright is involved, both economic and moral rights issues are at stake.
IP and Legal Filings
JUNE 29, 2024
Certain sections like 2(qq) and 38, define a “performer” and specify whether a person’s personality falls under the definition of a performer, under which a performer’s right may be asserted, hence prohibiting the unapproved marketing of a performer’s work. Ammini Amma and Ors.,
43(B)log
AUGUST 11, 2021
Twain gave her a signed & inscribed copy after publication, which descendants donated to UMd decades back. Peters starts out very formalist—you didn’t separately deliver the copies that you delivered to the gov’t, so no protection. Definitely true that they weren’t entirely pragmatic. Seems unlikely. Zvi Rosen: Wheaton v.
Velocity of Content
MARCH 16, 2023
After all, while we are pondering the weighty issue of future ownership, we are not focusing on the fundamental issue of wholesale copying of works to train AI in a wide variety of situations. This, of course, could be an accident based on true intellectual curiosity, but I do not believe it. is being used as code. Case 2- Anderson, et al.
Expert insights. Personalized for you.
60 
Let's personalize your content