Copying Copyright Law Information Moral Rights 
The IPKat
JANUARY 25, 2022
The cover provides the requisite information—title, author, and publisher. We are also informed that photograph itself is by RMN Photo—Arnaudet. As such, mechanical reproduction can never be authentic, nor can a copy ever be perfect, because it is detached from its aura. But of course. But this is not the case for works of art.
IP and Legal Filings
APRIL 20, 2023
Introduction Any literally or artistic work that is original and creative i.e.; not copied from anywhere by the owner is protected under Copyright Act, 1957. AI calculations gain from the information sources gave to them by developers. Thus, most would agree that AI-created work does not have the component of originality.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
IP and Legal Filings
DECEMBER 6, 2022
The transformed state of music now also includes remixes which on a substantial purview might engage in conflict with the foundational legal rights of the music produced by the musician. ” The composer of a musical composition is the exclusive owner of the work’s copyright. Right to communicate the work to the public.
Kluwer Copyright Blog
FEBRUARY 28, 2024
Over the course of a decade, Google copied large volumes of books and made them available online, both through excerpts, known as “snippets”, and as entire publications. As in the present context, the initial concern of copyright holders was that their consent had not been acquired by Google prior to scanning their works.
Kluwer Copyright Blog
DECEMBER 20, 2022
Photographs are included in Article 2(1) of the Berne Convention as copyrightable artistic works. All Berne Union Member States must thus provide copyright protection to photographic works. By contrast, the author of a simple photograph is not granted any moral right. Photographs of mere documentation.
SpicyIP
DECEMBER 20, 2023
Spadika Jayaraj discussed a case where the Delhi High Court dismissed a suit by a media house accusing copyright infringement on its database of users. The issue has often arisen in the context of protecting confidential information through copyright law. For a more specific discussion, see Prof.
43(B)log
FEBRUARY 19, 2022
Copyright Law Why are we so sure facts are excluded from the statute when the statute doesn’t use that word and uses a lot of other words. Harper & Row is cited by Feist to reiterate that selection coordination and arrangements of facts can be copyrightable. Natural or moral right to own fruit of labors.
Expert insights. Personalized for you.
133 
Let's personalize your content