This site uses cookies to improve your experience. To help us insure we adhere to various privacy regulations, please select your country/region of residence. If you do not select a country, we will assume you are from the United States. Select your Cookie Settings or view our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Used for the proper function of the website
Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Strictly Necessary: Used for the proper function of the website
Performance/Analytics: Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
After the first DSM Directive-related referral from Belgium on the provisions concerning contracts of authors and performers [IPKat here ] , it is now the turn of Article 15 (the relatedright for press publishers) as implemented into Italian law.
It is a job with lots of responsibility, joys, surprises and disappointments, but one thing is for sure publishing is a big part of our workload. To that end, we work very closely with academic publishers. One such topic is academic publishing and genAI deals between publishers and tech companies.
In 2019, the EU legislature introduced an EU-wide relatedright (Article 15 of the DSM Directive , on which see Katposts here ) for EU-based press publishers in relation to online uses of their press publications by information society service providers, including news aggregation services, social media, and search engines.
Recognising the challenges for performers in the position and enforcement of their rights, the book also includes discussion on other forms of protections and remedies for performers, such as moral rights, contracts, passing off and copyright infringement.
The Royal Decree concerning the relatedrights of artistic staff of the ONB was finally adopted and published in the Belgian Official Journal on 4th June of 2021. The Royal Decree acts as such a statute for the purposes of regulating the ownership and remuneration due for relatedrights.
Examples of the latter are the articles on authors’ and performers’ contracts (Articles 18 to 23). The proposed Italian press publishers’ right One of most visible examples of the above is the proposed Italian transposition of Article 15 (the press publishers’ right.
The European Federation of Academies of Sciences and Humanities (ALLEA) has for many years supported the move away from proprietary models of scientific publishing towards Open Access (OA). [1] As a recent study demonstrates, commercial publishers currently derive more than two billion USD annually from APCs.
It has been unable to secure a long-term broadcasting contract to guarantee its financial stability. “The proliferation of matches and competition from other audiovisual content, both sporting and non-sporting, creates an overabundance of content that challenges the balance of the football audiovisual exploitation rights market.”
Much has been said about the press publishers’ right, introduced by Article 15 of the Directive on Copyright in the Digital Single Market (CDSM). An important but relatively neglected flaw is its silence on the features of the licensing mechanism that Member States may and shall adopt for the management of the press publishers’ right.
Parts 1 to 3 of this post (originally published in “Auteurs & Media”) summarising case law of the German Bundesgerichtshof from 2015 to 2019 are available here , here and here. Copyright contract law (Sections 31 et seqq. Right of remuneration (Sections 32 et seqq. More from our authors: Law of Raw Data.
The belated Portuguese transposition of the CDSM Directive was finally published in the Portuguese Official Journal (Diário da República) on the 19th of June 2023. The law is silent regarding the possibility of transferring and waiving this right, which suggests such possibilities to be lawful. Museu do Azulejo by G.P.
In so doing, the Belgian legislator arguably went beyond what was required by the Directive and introduced new statutory remuneration rights for authors and performers. Press publishers’ right (Arts. 216/1 (case no. 216/2 (cases nos. 7922 and 7925), XI.228/4 228/4 (cases nos. 7922 and 7927), chapter 4/2 (cases nos. 216/1 and XI.216/2)
In August 2022, the European Commission’s Directorate-General for Research and Innovation published a study on EU copyright and relatedrights and access to and reuse of scientific publications, including open access. The post is published under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 Image by Mediamodifier from Pixabay.
Much has been said about the press publishers’ right, introduced by Article 15 of the Directive on Copyright in the Digital Single Market (CDSM). An important but relatively neglected flaw is its silence on the features of the licensing mechanism that Member States may and shall adopt for the management of the press publishers’ right.
However, that purchaser is entitled to carry out such a decompilation only to the extent necessary to effect that correction and in compliance, where appropriate, with the conditions laid down in the contract with the program’s rightsholder. Stay tuned as a comment on the judgment is coming soon in the blog. CDSM Directive implementation.
It is thus clear that TDM does matter - but what should its relationship with copyright and relatedrights be? Recital 8 acknowledges, on the one hand, the value and potential of TDM but, on the other hand, notes the restrictions that copyright and relatedrights pose to the doing of TDM activities without a licence.
Image accessed from here In another landmark development concerning the right of authors of underlying work, the Delhi High Court on May 23 in RDB and Co. HarperCollins Publishers India Pvt. So, would this mean that the plaintiff does not have any rights in the film Nayak? defendant). The plaintiff, RDB and Co.
The relevant act, seeking to bring Ireland in line with the Directive, is the Statutory Instrument 567/2021 ‘European Union (Copyright and RelatedRights in the Digital Single Market) Regulations 2021’ (hereinafter ‘ the Regulations’ ). The Irish legislative transposition finally became law on 19 November 2021. Section 53A).
Since its establishment, GEA has claimed to be entitled to collect the above equitable remuneration not only for its members (ie, rights holders represented by it) but also on behalf of producers, performers, and musicians who are not represented by it on the basis of a contract or relevant mandate. or idaroussou@metaxopouloslaw.gr ).
Some consider that the Government was influenced by the French union of book publishers Syndicat National de l’Edition – SNE when it decided to leave out the term ‘appropriate’ when transposing the principle of ‘ appropriate and proportionate remuneration ’ of articles 18 and 20 of the CDSM. The implementation of the CDSM into French law.
15(5) CDSM Directive, journalists, or to be more accurate, authors of works included in press publications, are entitled to receive an appropriate share of the revenues press publishers collect from platforms for online use of their publications. Pursuant to art. And among those that did, the share varies quite significantly.
The European Federation of Academies of Sciences and Humanities (ALLEA) has for many years supported the move away from proprietary models of scholarly publishing towards Open Access (OA). [1] In those six Member States where SPRs do exist, the rules regarding the conditions and scope of the right vary considerably.
With the adoption of both the Directive on Copyright and RelatedRights in the Digital Single Market (CDSM) and the Digital Services Act (DSA), the European Union has moved away from the notice-and-takedown model for copyright enforcement and content moderation. Click here and here to know more. Click here to know more.
Léon has recently published a book on the subject, which is being launched on 12 January 2024. Kevin Bercimuelle-Chamot discussed a recent ruling from the Paris Court of Appeal, which held that L'Oréal's continued use of photographs beyond the period stipulated in the copyright assignment contract constituted infringement in France.
At the end of 2021, YouTube’s first Copyright Transparency Report 2021 (“Report”) was published. A vanishing right? The Sui Generis Database Right and the proposed Data Act by Paul Keller. [T]he T]he European Commission published its proposal for a Data Act. 17 DSM Directive 2019/790 (“DSMD”). .
The 42nd session of the World Intellectual Property Organization’s (WIPO) Standing Committee on Copyright and RelatedRights (SCCR) took place from 9 to 13 May 2022 in Geneva. Image by Ag Ku via Pixabay. This was the first time since the COVID-19 pandemic started that most of the delegates were reunited in person.
The IPKat has published several posts over the past two weeks! COPYRIGHT Katfriend Moritz Sutterer posted on a new competition tool that the German Competition Authority recently tried out against Google in relation to press publishers' neighbouring right.
2121/1993 on “Copyright, RelatedRights and Cultural Matters” ), as well as L. 4481/2017, on “Collective Management of Copyright and RelatedRights” ( ΦΕΚ Α’ 100/20.7.2017 ). As it introduces a new related/neighbouring right for press publishers (PPR), the provision has been placed in Section VII of L.
2021-580 of 12 May 2021 (‘transposition Order’) of the French Government implements articles 2(6) and 17 to 23 of the EU Directive 2019/790 on copyright and relatedrights in the Digital Single Market (‘CDSM’). Image by Pexels from Pixabay Order no.
Part I of this post discussed the changes to copyright contract law and the new text and data mining exemption provisions that formed part of the 2021 copyright law reform. Part 2 explores further exemptions for users of works, new aspects of the right of communication to the public and the press publishers’ right.
This included the highly controversial Articles 15 and 17 on, respectively, the new press publishers’ right (PPR) and the new copyright liability scheme for “online content-sharing services providers” (OCSSPs). The post is published under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 Article 15 CDSMD: the new press publishers’ right (PPR).
It has several aims, including the following: To facilitate copyright and relatedrights licensing in protected works and other subject matters in certain television transmissions and radio programs. To add article 51B to Law 2121/1993 in favour of press publishers regarding the online use of their publications by service providers.
In order to carry out this activity, company A signed contracts with certain suppliers from which it acquired all of the copyrights and relatedrights regarding the specific musical repertoire. It may therefore be concluded that such right is not assigned to a CMO.
Under the Copyright Law, certain copyright and relatedrights are subject to mandatory collective management, meaning that they can be exercised only through a collective management organisation (CMO). Further, they have the right to choose whether they will join a Greek or a foreign organisation, and if so, which CMO that will be.
The claimant had duly published a fee schedule for businesses who may have wished to use the musical works (such as cafes, restaurants, coffee shops, refreshment rooms, fast-food restaurants, coffee-patisseries, internet cafes, etc).
because there is no public access regime that applies, or because third parties own intellectual property rights. Where third parties such as publishers or data services hold copyright or sui generis rights (or relatedrights) the public sector body would then of course have to ensure it has proper authorization from the right holder.
This prevents the possible infringement of the exclusive right to reproduce a computer program provided for in article 42(2) of the Copyright Law, which belongs to the creator or author of the relevant program. This article was originally edited by, and first published on, www.lexology.com. Endnotes (1) Decision No. 2916/2022. (2)
Its massive use brings legal consequences for classic IP rights and offers real challenges in particular to trade marks, copyright and relatedrights and patents. FIDE - The Metaverse As A Challenge To Classical IP - 29 June 2022 - Online The Metaverse steadily developed, and its role became even more central to the business.
We are happy to announce that going forward we will be publishing an annual review of the case law of the German Bundesgerichtshof, authored by Jan Bernd Nordemnann (NORDEMANN law firm). This first part covers the definition of a work, authorship and moral rights. Germany has always had an extensive judicial practice in copyright law.
The new copyright law, the amended Polish Copyright and RelatedRights Act of 1994, entered into force in the early autumn of 2024. Part II shall then discuss the right to remuneration and the rights of press publishers. Poland is the last country, after Bulgaria , to implement the CDSM Directive.
The European Commission published the first draft of the Code on 14 November 2024. Before contracting with third parties for the use of data sets for GPAI model development, the Providers must conduct reasonable copyright due diligence.
We organize all of the trending information in your field so you don't have to. Join 9,000+ users and stay up to date on the latest articles your peers are reading.
You know about us, now we want to get to know you!
Let's personalize your content
Let's get even more personalized
We recognize your account from another site in our network, please click 'Send Email' below to continue with verifying your account and setting a password.
Let's personalize your content