This site uses cookies to improve your experience. To help us insure we adhere to various privacy regulations, please select your country/region of residence. If you do not select a country, we will assume you are from the United States. Select your Cookie Settings or view our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Used for the proper function of the website
Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Strictly Necessary: Used for the proper function of the website
Performance/Analytics: Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
This is a case focusing on ownership of socialmedia accounts. See “ SocialMedia Ownership Disputes Part II: Bridal Wear Company Takes Back Control of Instagram Account from Ex-Employee ” and “ Another Confused Entry in the SocialMedia Account Ownership Jurisprudence–JLM v. (See The court also found “Ms.
There are two critically important cases over “socialmedia addiction” pending in California state court and as an MDL in the federal Northern District of California. It is an all-out brawl in federal court, with no-expense-spared battles over each and every picayune litigation issue.
The Texas socialmedia censorship law remains temporarily enjoined by the Fifth Circuit pending Supreme Court review, but Davis couldn’t wait. Davis claimed that Texas’ socialmedia censorship law preempted the TOS venue clause. Davis argued that the TOSes are contracts of adhesion.
The last time we blogged this case , the district court had sided with JLM, initially restricting Gutman’s use of the socialmedia accounts and then awarding control over the accounts to JLM. What does a 200+ year old fox have to say about who owns socialmedia accounts?). ” (Cite to Pierson v.
The opinion holds that the key parts of Florida’s socialmedia censorship law (SB 7072) likely violate the First Amendment and should remain enjoined. ” The opinion also highlights the madness of the Fifth Circuit allowing the Texas socialmedia censorship law to take effect via a 1-line order. “S.B.
Plaintiffs CAN’T WAIT to sue Internet services using the Texas socialmedia censorship law. Nevertheless, the plaintiffs argued that the law “evidences a strong public policy to protect Texans from wrongful censorship on socialmedia platforms.” But surprise! I hope it doesn’t.
“Influencer Marketing” and “SocialMedia Brand Endorsement” have become big business. Our law firm represents some of the business’s largest socialmedia marketing agencies and influencers. This means they also own and need to license the copyright to the brand. This happens all the time.
The screenshots are also excused: “Single still-frame screenshots from videos posted on socialmedia platforms, which make up a very small fraction of the original video, are generally considered to constitute de minimis use and fall below the substantial similarity threshold.” Lynk Media LLC v. IHeartMedia, Inc.,
But by providing a foil in litigation against both the Center for Countering Digital Hate (“CCDH”) and Bright Data (the world’s largest seller of scraped data), he’s given judges in the most important district court in the country for tech legal issues, the Northern District of California, plenty of motivation to rule against him.
If the case stands on appeal, Twitter will write a check to CCDH to compensate it for the litigation harms Twitter has imposed on it. In a highly technical ruling, the court rejects Twitter’s CFAA claim on a motion to dismiss and rejects Twitter’s other claims, including breach of contract, on an anti-SLAPP motion to strike.
In February, Meta lost on Partial Summary Judgment against Bright Data on its breach of contract claim. had its breach of contract and CFAA claims against the Center for Countering Digital Hate (“CCDH”) dismissed at the motion to dismiss stage. Here, the court muddles the various contract formation standards.
He dismissed American’s claims for breach of user agreement, conditions of carriage (the rules governing air travel), and tortious interference with contract, ruling they were barred by the statute of limitations. A good example comes from a case I litigated years ago on behalf of Costco.
Defendants also managed the socialmedia presence of the “La Baguette” business, which primarily consisted of a Facebook page. Breach of Contract : Plaintiffs only alleged a contract claim, based on breach of a non-compete, against the one defendant who had signed the non-compete. See generally, Christopher A.
Knowing well that litigation in the Northern District of Texas is not in its best interests, TPG filed a declaratory judgment in Delaware hoping to take advantage of the first-to-file rule. With all that, the first battle in this litigation will be the question of where to litigate it. Breach of Contract 2. Facebook v.
The complaint mentioned that Matienzo describes herself as an “archivist” and uses the handle “anarchivist” on socialmedia. ” Some of the allegations ‘No Shred of Evidence’ In total, OCLC asserts twelve claims against Matienzo including breach of contract, unjust enrichment, and trespass of chattels.
The user took the matter to court (pro se), where the lawsuit failed: Contract Breach. This case also highlights the stakes of the individualized explanations requirement in the TX and FL socialmedia censorship laws if those survive constitutional scrutiny. The user disagreed, appealed, and got nowhere. ” Fraud.
Rule 40 restricts socialmedia posts and advertisements published by athletes and sponsors during the Games, both in volume and content. As socialmedia posts generate buzz and draw fans, spectators will have a chance to enjoy getting behind-the-scenes looks and instant updates from their favourite athletes.
For example, the most aggressive companies in pursuing web-scraping litigation are the socialmedia companies. And while their terms of use provide the socialmedia companies a license to use that user-generated content, it is their users who typically have a copyright interest in their content.
Prager tried a variety of contract-based workarounds to Section 230. Going beyond the contracts, Prager looks to various “promises” it alleges that defendants made through public-facing comments. Indeed, the whole “but the algorithms” attack on Section 230 has always been nonsensical.
These questions are being addressed (in mostly unsatisfactory ways) in litigation involving hiQ and BrandTotal. BrandTotal “provides advertising consulting services to corporate clients regarding how those clients’ and their competitors’ digital advertisements are presented to socialmedia users.” ” Oof.
Shared sued Facebook for: Shared avers that Meta committed conversion (Claim 1), breach of contract (Claim 3), and breach of the implied covenant of good faith and fair dealing (Claim 4) in suspending access to Shared’s Facebook pages, contrary to the Facebook Terms of Service.
That legal standard could devastate socialmedia usage in Australia. It increases the risk that ordinary socialmedia users could be liable for defamation caused by their so-called friends. That risk encourages socialmedia users to actively police the comments of their friends–or stop posting entirely.
Two More Courts Tell Litigants That SocialMedia Services Aren’t State Actors. Anti-Zionist Loses Lawsuit Over SocialMedia Account Suspensions–Martillo v. Are SocialMedia Services “State Actors” or “Common Carriers”? One More Time: Facebook Isn’t a State Actor–Atkinson v.
On the first, substantial litigation has already been launched concerning whether the data used to train these models requires payment or opt-in from creatives whose work has been ingested, often without consent. Two key issues have generated much argument, relating respectively to the inputs to and outputs from large models.
2, 2022): Nor does personal jurisdiction arise out of the Film Defendants’ so-called “advertising strategy,” which allegedly “featured a significant push on socialmedia[ ] targeting Washington, DC residents via Instagram and Facebook.” targeted socialmedia advertising. Parker, 2022 WL 17403220 (D.D.C.
The dispute between writers and former friends Sonya Larson and Dawn Dorland over a short story involving a kidney donation has captured the attention of socialmedia during the past week. Well, that would have been joyful news to me about the middle of December, when I gladly took the first offer that came, and made a contract.
IP law in publishing, especially at The Globe – who is known for being an early provider of digital media and device-agnostic content delivery – goes far beyond copyright infringement and litigation. Complying with privacy regulations, especially in IT contracts, is as important as it can be misunderstood.
After two trips to the 9th Circuit, a remand from the Supreme Court, and nearly six years of motions and posturing, the outcome of the litigation was a permanent injunction against hiQ, a win for LinkedIn, and insolvency for scraper hiQ Labs. That said, few scraping-related cases pursue these issues past the first few stages of litigation.
I posted a chapter from the book: Online Contracts. Will California Clone-and-Revise Some Terrible Ideas from Florida/Texas’ SocialMedia Censorship Laws? Big Ruling for Free Speech: Most of Florida’s SocialMedia Censorship Law (SB 7072) Remains Enjoined–NetChoice v. Analysis of CA AB587). Attorney General.
Since the game title and NFTs were based on the use of F1, the game, the NFTs, the website, and the socialmedia channels using ‘F1’ all had to be shut down. Securities law, contract law, consumer protection laws, and causes of action for fraud and misrepresentation are all possible legal claims.
For trademarks, a good place to start is the company’s marketing and promotional materials, website, mobile app, and socialmedia. Don’t overlook company socialmedia accounts, domain names, and toll-free numbers, which may also serve as potential trademarks.
But the real question to me as a litigator is whether this doctrine should become part of the tool bag going forward. Included within the JLM contract were certain restrictive covenants, including a non-competition agreement, as well as various intellectual property assignment provisions. Gutman , 24 F.4th 4th 785 (2d Cir.
In a November ruling, a magistrate judge notes that the lawsuit appears to be the first of its kindone in which a socialmedia influencer accuses another influencer of (among other things) copyright infringement based on the similarities between their posts that promote the same products. Sydney Nicole LLC v. Sydney Nicole LLC v.
Implications This is surely not the last word on the subject because Shah litigated pro se. For a more convincing ruling, we need to see how a well-trained copyright litigator navigates this legal issue. Still, its implications are wide-ranging.
3, 2022) Plaintiffs alleged that they employed the individual defendants in part to manage socialmedia advertising and promotion for plaintiffs’ baking businesses, aka La Baguette. The law on the ownership of a socialmedia pages created by employees for employers is evolving rapidly and varies between jurisdictions.
Thus, I always felt the litigation ploy acted as an adverse admission by the plaintiffs. As the Newman court summarized, “this case has shed its intentional discrimination and constitutional claims, becoming—first and foremost—a breach of contract dispute.” This sets up YouTube for a major own-goal. .”
The court’s March 14 ruling (read here) rejected the defendants’ assertion that copyright terminations served by Bono’s heirs effectively preempted Cher’s state law contract rights. At this rate, the Cher-Bono litigation may end up lasting longer than the couple’s marriage.
The research reveals that, while the law influences the permission to be sought, these industries often contract with individuals to add value to their products via collaboration, and to avoid damage to reputation that might occur if permission were not sought in accordance through social norms.
To my knowledge, the only litigated case that resulted in a 512(f) win was Online Policy Group v. The 512(f) plaintiff wins after 3 years of litigation and a bench trial. Amazon is a key player in this litigation, but the court doesn’t address its responsibility at all. A New 512(f) Plaintiff Win! So what did it win?
Ryanair has a long history of litigating against OTAs in Europe and the United States. It has previously litigated against OTAs in Spain, France, Ireland, and Switzerland, with mixed results. It previously litigated against Expedia in Washington. The facts of the case are relatively simple, with a couple of twists.
It simply converts a litigation battle over retaliation into a battle over whether the DJP violated the TOS. Further, unhappy DJPs will still claim that broad TOS provisions were selectively enforced against them due to the platform’s retaliatory intent, so even tricky TOS drafting won’t eliminate the litigation risk.]
Frequent TTAB litigant Monster Energy lost another one at the TTAB, this time on summary judgment. entity, and, ultimately, entered into contracts for U.S. The registration was blocking Monster's application to register PREDATOR for energy drinks, soft drinks, and sports drinks. created a U.S. marketing strategies, U.S.
Bluegreen sued a lot of entities, but only the marketing defendants remained in the case: their role was “to advertise timeshare exit services by promoting a legitimate process to exit timeshare contracts while protecting the customers’ credit.” Any “exit” came from default.
Plus, they hadn’t removed existing false advertising from their socialmedia accounts. Defendants assert that “[i]t is impossible for VPX to review and eliminate all of the hundreds of thousands archived and historical socialmedia posts that may include an image of the legacy [BANG] can or logo.”
We organize all of the trending information in your field so you don't have to. Join 9,000+ users and stay up to date on the latest articles your peers are reading.
You know about us, now we want to get to know you!
Let's personalize your content
Let's get even more personalized
We recognize your account from another site in our network, please click 'Send Email' below to continue with verifying your account and setting a password.
Let's personalize your content