This site uses cookies to improve your experience. To help us insure we adhere to various privacy regulations, please select your country/region of residence. If you do not select a country, we will assume you are from the United States. Select your Cookie Settings or view our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Used for the proper function of the website
Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Strictly Necessary: Used for the proper function of the website
Performance/Analytics: Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
In summer 2020, AHBP began negotiating with the Lynd defendants for the exclusive license to market and sell a surface disinfectant/cleaner known as “Bioprotect 500” in Argentina. Lynd advertised the Product as effective against the coronavirus. the Lanham Act falseadvertising claim survived.
Thus, some but not all breach of contract claims survived. References in Columbia’s marketing materials to “the on-campus experience” were often mere puffery “too vague to be enforced as a contract,” such as a statement in a University publication that “Columbia is an in-person kind of place.” So too for similar Pace claims.
12, 2023) Following a large verdict for Monster on falseadvertising claims, this opinion discusses extensively the requirements for injunctive relief in falseadvertising cases. Are lost prospective customers and market share purely economic harms? So too with lost market share. and] expects to complete.
Kitchen Cube cube Leszczynski sued for (1) copyright infringement; (2) violation of Creative Commons license terms; and (3) falseadvertising and misrepresentation. The breach of contract claim survived. Falseadvertising: Only ok against Kitchen Cube.
30, 2025) This is a ruling on 19 motions to exclude expert testimony in this case, which is mostly an antitrust case; I will focus only on some falseadvertising-relevant rulings. Butler was an expert on survey research, market research, sampling, and statistical analysis.
Roach, meanwhile, makes frequent use of the phrase “The Unstoppable Entrepreneur” and applied to register the phrase for “Business consultancy; Business marketing consulting services.” Entrepreneur’s desire to bring forth a claim for falseadvertising against a competitor in a similar market is not unusual behavior.”
11, 2021) Another timeshare versus timeshare exit falseadvertising case. Marketing Defendants allegedly falselyadvertise timeshare exit services by promoting a legitimate process to exit timeshare contracts. This opinion considered only the marketing defendants. The other claims survived too.
InSinkErator also provided market research to show that consumers ranked horsepower as one of the top purchasing considerations for garbage disposals, as well as retailer perspective indicating that horsepower was a key differentiating factorLowes and Home Depot organize and advertise them by horsepower.
FalseAdvertising. In general, courts should not permit a falseadvertising claim based on a “safe” representation where the representation is rendered untrue by third-party content. ” This is a highly defense-favorable reading of the contract provision. eBay case from 2008. Implications.
Perhaps the false pretenses could give rise to claims not alleged in this case? Breach of contract, perhaps? But that would only be enforceable by users in contract privity). Is it falseadvertising for Facebook to describe the groups as “private”? Does that create a claim for falseadvertising?
As alleged, Each ISP’s contract grants it a certain service area, or “route,” and the ISP is permitted to sell its route to another entity if they can agree on terms. Together they are known as CSPs, contracted service providers. 10, 2023) FedEx uses around 4500 independent contractors (ISPs) to pick up and deliver packages.
Thus, Lady Freethinker sued YouTube for breach of contract and related claims. (A The underlying legal principles are not complicated: content rules in TOSes are negative behavioral restrictions on authors’ conduct, not marketing or contractual promises to readers that such content will never appear on the site.
Pandora Marketing, LLC, 2021 WL 1573073, CV 20-5486 DSF (ADSx) (C.D. Here, Diamond sued both the marketers who seek exit clients and also the lawyers who worked with them. Diamond Resorts U.S. Collection Development, LLC v. 12, 2021) Another timeshare company v. timeshare exit company case.
Bluegreen sued a lot of entities, but only the marketing defendants remained in the case: their role was “to advertise timeshare exit services by promoting a legitimate process to exit timeshare contracts while protecting the customers’ credit.” In a particularly “yikes” bit, one marketing defendant 1990.
The non-fungible part means that it is something that has unique value based on the buyer’s sentiment and/or market dynamics. In practice, what this means is that a whole new market has been opened-up as NFTs have provided a system that has enabled the sale of digital items by transforming them into collectables, such as a tweet.
Defendants allegedly marketed the My Avastars dolls with a “code” that could be used in the Roblox platform. more images from the complaint Interestingly, the contract/tortious interference claims against US resident defendants had to be arbitrated because of Roblox's own TOS.
Safelite allegedly falselyadvertised that (1) “if damage spreads beyond the size of a dollar bill, a replacement will be necessary”; (2) “when a chip is smaller than a dollar bill, it can usually be repaired without replacing the windshield.” can be safe and is viable.” Were plaintiffs’ injuries proximately caused by Safelite?
Courts have rejected Section 230 defenses against claims for falseadvertising, deceptive trade practices, and tortious interference. Certain claims sounding in contract or tort may be beyond the reach of Section 230(c)(2)’s protection from suit. Vimeo appeared first on Technology & Marketing Law Blog. 3d 1265 (M.D.
CCM counterclaimed for abuse of process and for violations of the Lanham Act and related state laws; one ex-employee also brought counterclaims against loanDepot for breach of contract and breach of the implied covenant of good faith and fair dealing. The false association/coordinate state law claims survived.
The falseadvertising counterclaim arose from a legal memo that IHS sent to customers who had been contacted by two people on behalf of defendant TDM: We understand that you have been contacted by Trade Data Monitor offering an equivalent service to the Global Trade Atlas.
Even if Google’s conduct could be interpreted as a technical violation of many websites’ notoriously overbroad terms of service, their conduct doesn’t meet the criteria for most online breach of contract disputes. Trademark, copyright, trespass to chattels, the law of online contracts—none of this stuff is novel.
Drug manufacturers still need an NDA or ANDA to sell their drugs, but, during the pendency of an open DESI proceeding, the FDA permits the subject product or drug to remain on the market. They are therefore allowed on the market during the DESI review pendency and qualify as pharmaceutically equivalent.
12, 2022) Plaintiffs sued defendants for copyright infringement, violation of the Lanham Act, breach of contract, and violation of unfair competition law; copyright and breach of contract claims survived a motion to dismiss but the others didn’t. Breach of contract claims survived. CV 22-4735-RSWL-Ex (C.D.
Plaintiff attempted to plead that a small number of calls to people contracting with it constituted “commercial advertising or promotion,” but the court still didn’t buy it. The parties compete to manage vacation rental properties located in Oregon, and plaintiff alleged a smear campaign against it.
He paid money to get extra visibility for his dating profile and claims he got poor results, so he sued Bumble for falseadvertising. Bumble appeared first on Technology & Marketing Law Blog. Alkutkar used the dating app Bumble. Bumble successfully redirects the case to arbitration based on its TOS. Bumble, Inc.
This is a falseadvertising lawsuit again the mobile app game Game of Thrones: Conquest. appeared first on Technology & Marketing Law Blog. The account formation process included a screen where a user could proceed only by clicking on the “play” button: Warner Bros. sought to send the case to arbitration.
Plaintiffs sued for breach of contract under Tennessee common law and falseadvertising in violation of the Lanham Act. (OK, OK, I’m not a big false endorsement fan, but … isn’t this false endorsement? Plaintiffs terminated an agreement to insure Securranty Inc.’s Insert your own insurance-related pun.)
2, 2022) Before the jury verdict in favor of Monster’s falseadvertising claim was this opinion resolving evidentiary issues. They weren’t directly asked about the phrase “Super Creatine,” whether participants had prior experiences with or opinions of Bang, or whether they had seen Vital’s advertising in the market.
for trademark infringement, falseadvertising and patent infringement. The EMSCULPT is a non-invasive medical device designed to stimulate muscle contraction using electromagnetic energy. Indianapolis, Indiana –The Plaintiff, BTL Industries, Inc. filed suit against Plaintiff JV Medical Supplies, Inc.
Normally trademark owners aren’t third-party beneficiaries of that contract. Any error on country-of-origin disclosures sets up the third-party sellers for falseadvertising claims. Per Malwarebytes , the online marketplace should qualify for Section 230 protection for the Lanham Act falseadvertising claims).
19, 2022) The parties compete in the market for energy drinks. VPX (Vital) makes BANG, which now contains creatyl-l-leucine (CLL), “a novel ingredient marketed under the trademark ‘Super Creatine.’ … Defendants claim that CLL is more stable and more bioavailable than other forms of creatine.”
The claim is for trade mark infringement, unfair competition, falseadvertising, cybersquatting, and other cause of actions before the Central District of California. What is really interesting is that the smart contract does not contain a link to the image but rather a link to a JSON file.
Princeton insured Wonderland from 2016-2018 (with a broad exclusion for defamation, invasion of privacy, and various forms of advertising injury in the second year called the Exhibitions and Related Marketing Exclusion), and agreed to defend the club but reserved the right to deny insurance coverage.
Whole Foods Market Service, Inc., Whole Foods began purchasing small quantities of basil from them and selling the product in Whole Foods Market stores in the San Diego area in 2007. Falseadvertising: Plaintiffs didn’t plausibly plead a false or misleading statement in a commercial advertisement or promotion.
On Friday, July 21, an Illinois district court ruled that a Pakistani employee of a medical device distribution company infringed on Ethicon’s trademark when he bought, marketed and sold counterfeit Ethicon devices. Ethicon is a subsidiary of Johnson & Johnson and won an $18 million default judgment.
Route sued for breach of contract, commercial disparagement and defamation per se, intentional tortious interference with contractual relations, falseadvertising, and contributory trademark infringement. The breach of contract claim survived. Heuberger was a Route customer who then launched a competitor, Navidium.
DealMaker alleged that defendants stole its trade secrets and also alleged violation of state and federal falseadvertising law. DealMaker argued that its offers weren’t the same as Issuance’s so one-to-one comparisons were false, and that its fees don’t depend on a percentage of capital raised.
Allegations: With the goal of increasing its market share, Vacasa “sent out promotional mailers to homeowners with properties located in the same geographic areas where [Plaintiff] manages vacation rental properties.” The purpose of each call was to convince the individual to switch companies. This wasn’t specific and factual enough.
ABI claims Defendants have used those documents relating to the Product Lines to market knockoff products. ABI claims it has attained significant goodwill throughout the United States and the world and that Defendants alleged misleading and falseadvertisements have caused irreparable damage to ABI’s reputation.
Plaintiffs sought to amend the complaint to add, inter alia, a Lanham Act falseadvertising claim, which the court held was not futile. Footnote: Commercial advertising or promotion isn’t necessarily straightforward. Is this an organized campaign to penetrate the relevant market?
Touro’s online program was allegedly marketed and priced as a “separate and distinct product[ ]” and bore no fees for in-person services. Breach of contract: The complaint failed to allege specific promises sufficient to form an implied contract to provide on-campus services.
As the licensee, Brown Bottling had “standing to bring false affiliation claims under Section 43(a).” Then the court recited the elements of falseadvertising under §43(a)(1)(B), and then it identified the multifactor confusion test as the relevant test, so your guess is as good as mine about what provision is at issue.
and other unfair acts such as misappropriation of trade secrets, falseadvertising, breach of contract, and antitrust violations. Many IP owners are facing more competition from infringing imported products and are looking ways to maintain and grow their position in the market. In comparison to litigating in U.S.
They then agreed that Chiusa would create and operate a website, colorcopper.com, marketing and distributing Stubenrauch’s copper sheets “to a new industry for copper countertops, bar tops and kitchen backsplash.” Falseadvertising: The allegations identified “merely describe the supposed underlying trademark infringement.”
We organize all of the trending information in your field so you don't have to. Join 9,000+ users and stay up to date on the latest articles your peers are reading.
You know about us, now we want to get to know you!
Let's personalize your content
Let's get even more personalized
We recognize your account from another site in our network, please click 'Send Email' below to continue with verifying your account and setting a password.
Let's personalize your content