This site uses cookies to improve your experience. To help us insure we adhere to various privacy regulations, please select your country/region of residence. If you do not select a country, we will assume you are from the United States. Select your Cookie Settings or view our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Used for the proper function of the website
Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Strictly Necessary: Used for the proper function of the website
Performance/Analytics: Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
In summer 2020, AHBP began negotiating with the Lynd defendants for the exclusive license to market and sell a surface disinfectant/cleaner known as “Bioprotect 500” in Argentina. Lynd advertised the Product as effective against the coronavirus. the Lanham Act falseadvertising claim survived.
Defendants allegedly copied key components of Trackman’s copyrighted software and falsely suggested, in promotions and advertisements, that defendants were authorized to use the well-known courses in their game. Although the court dismissed a contract claim, copyright and falseadvertising claims survived.
15, 2024) This putative class action alleged that Amazon overcharged and “[d]eceived consumers by misrepresenting that it was selling them Digital Content when, in fact, it was really only licensing it to them[.]” The court disagreed: there’s a plausible difference in value between owning outright versus purchasing a revocable license.
The Cube file was provided under a Creative Commons, non-commercial, no derivatives license. It advertised “This device was one of the most popular items on a popular 3D printing website with over 20,000 unique downloads” on its website, at a time when Leszczynski’s Thingiverse page displayed that his Cube had been downloaded 20,000 times.
30, 2025) This is a ruling on 19 motions to exclude expert testimony in this case, which is mostly an antitrust case; I will focus only on some falseadvertising-relevant rulings. brewer works only with Keurig brand or licensed pods) but some did not (e.g., I prefer the taste of Keurig or Keurig-licensed brands.).
It does so at the Rose Bowl Stadium under three contracts with Pasadena, including a Master License Agreement, Trademark Agreement, and Trademark Consent Agreement. This also got rid of the breach of contract claim, which was based on the alleged trademark infringement and falseadvertising.
On 24 June 2022, BAYC sued Ryder Ripps, a conceptual artist and NFT creator for trade mark infringement, unfair competition, falseadvertising, cybersquatting and other cause of actions before the Central District of California. This is a U.S NFTs – still subject to “old” IP law An NFT is a non-fungible (i.e. Ether (USD 1+ million).
FalseAdvertising. In general, courts should not permit a falseadvertising claim based on a “safe” representation where the representation is rendered untrue by third-party content. ” This is a highly defense-favorable reading of the contract provision. eBay case from 2008. Implications.
Digital assets can be protected by IP and have always been capable of being licensed or assigned via a contract, or protected as a trade mark. For example, the owners of the famous “ Grumpy Cat ” meme licensed the use of the name, image and likeness of the cat – and successfully enforced these rights.
Thus, Lady Freethinker sued YouTube for breach of contract and related claims. (A Rather than engaging this contract law issue directly, the court rules for YouTube on Section 230 grounds: Lady Freethinker’s claims ultimately seek to treat Google as the publisher or speaker of content provided by another information content provider.
Courts have rejected Section 230 defenses against claims for falseadvertising, deceptive trade practices, and tortious interference. Certain claims sounding in contract or tort may be beyond the reach of Section 230(c)(2)’s protection from suit. See, e.g., E-Ventures Worldwide, LLC v. Google, Inc. , 3d 1265 (M.D. eBay, Inc. ,
25, 2021) Unlike the education cases so far, this pandemic case sustains both consumer protection and contract claims. Defendants first argued that passes didn’t not qualify as “goods or services” under the CLRA, but were only temporary licenses, with services provided only ancillary to the license. Alterra Mountain Co.,
Even if Google’s conduct could be interpreted as a technical violation of many websites’ notoriously overbroad terms of service, their conduct doesn’t meet the criteria for most online breach of contract disputes. Trademark, copyright, trespass to chattels, the law of online contracts—none of this stuff is novel.
The defendant was initially given “complete and exclusive licensing rights in and to [the selected mares] and all cloned foals.” Litigation ensued, with lots of claims, including the Lanham Act claims on which I will focus, though breach of contract claims were prominent and survived a motion to dismiss.
The claim is for trade mark infringement, unfair competition, falseadvertising, cybersquatting, and other cause of actions before the Central District of California. What is really interesting is that the smart contract does not contain a link to the image but rather a link to a JSON file.
Route sued for breach of contract, commercial disparagement and defamation per se, intentional tortious interference with contractual relations, falseadvertising, and contributory trademark infringement. The breach of contract claim survived. Heuberger was a Route customer who then launched a competitor, Navidium.
The falseadvertising parts: Jeong alleged that Nexo advertised to consumers that it does not own users’ collateral (e.g., In addition, Jeong alleged that Nexo violated the unlawful prong of the UCL by offering loans in California despite lacking a California Finance Lender (CFL) License.
This is a falseadvertising lawsuit again the mobile app game Game of Thrones: Conquest. The account formation process included a screen where a user could proceed only by clicking on the “play” button: Warner Bros. sought to send the case to arbitration. The district court disagreed. Warner Bros.
4, 2022) Frequent IP claimant Lisa Frank is in court this time over a failed deal with a vegan cosmetics company, whose contract aspects I will ignore. To say we are disappointed by the events that transpired as a result of this license is an understatement. CV-21-00228-TUC-SHR, 2022 WL 3098042 (D.
He paid money to get extra visibility for his dating profile and claims he got poor results, so he sued Bumble for falseadvertising. Alkutkar used the dating app Bumble. Bumble successfully redirects the case to arbitration based on its TOS. Alkutkar joined Bumble in 2016. ” I don’t understand how that happened.
DealMaker alleged that defendants stole its trade secrets and also alleged violation of state and federal falseadvertising law. DealMaker noted that Issuance’s own terms include a provision that allows Issuance to license its data. Defendants offered examples of contracts that, they argued, had a fee structure of 8-10%.
As the licensee, Brown Bottling had “standing to bring false affiliation claims under Section 43(a).” Then the court recited the elements of falseadvertising under §43(a)(1)(B), and then it identified the multifactor confusion test as the relevant test, so your guess is as good as mine about what provision is at issue.
But DNP isn’t actually licensed to practice law. MillerKing, a small Chicago law firm that claims to be a direct competitor of DNP, sued DNP for false association and falseadvertising under the Lanham Act and Illinois state law. DNP advertises that it uses artificial intelligence” rather than “human knowledge.”
Enigma sued its competitor Malwarebytes for Lanham Act falseadvertising and NY business torts for designating its products as “malicious,” “threats,” and “potentially unwanted programs” (PUPs). Enigma alleged that its software products “(i) detect and remove malicious software (i.e.,
The Court interpreted the clause on ownership of work made during a contract of service (Section 17(c)) to not apply in situations where there is a contract between equals. The Court limited the scope of Section 17(c) to apply to contracts where the relationship between the parties is akin to that of an apprenticeship.
“Regardless of which device is used to access digital content, or which ‘iTunes’ app is used to buy or rent the digital content, the app provides a tab or folder labeled ‘purchased.’ ” But when third parties terminate their licensing agreements with Apple, Apple “must revoke [a] consumer[’s] access” to purchased digital content “without warning.”
EBPHI administers and owns the National Home Inspectors Examination (NHIE), an exam many states use to license home inspectors. In addition to being a membership association for home inspectors, InterNACHI also offers a competing licensing exam for the home inspection industry. Two entities, EBPHI and ASHI, sued InterNACHI.
Social media influencers sign contracts with businesses to promote their products by providing original content for such brands. Falseadvertising should be avoided when defaming a product. Avoid using brand names, logos, trademarks, and copyrighted material without first obtaining the relevant permits and licenses.
Sheff: What about licensing/merchandising in this system? Many contracts—77%--say sellers can only use marketing claims or materials provided by company; 71% say other claims must be pre-approved (that seems contradictory). 57% say sellers could be liable for false etc. claims, but only 24% reference or explain specific rules.
combined together for at least two decades to fraudulently represent that they had and still have a copyright on the LOVE image and engaged in falselicensing to the tune of millions of dollars, harming plaintiff, which is authorized to produce and market the HOPE [i]mage and is in direct competition with the LOVE image.
For about a decade, courts had realized that IIC had gone way too far, and had expanded liability in ways that didn’t protect consumers and facilitated anticompetitive claims about falseadvertising. May 20, 2021) (R&R) renting existing equipment; Pine was formerly one of Proactive’s licensed distributors for the pumps.
Amy Baxter, Licensing Administrator at the Nantucket Police Department, met with Gordon and subsequently emailed a third party about a change in ownership and management of the Wine Fest. The court relied on Massachusetts General Laws Chapter 93A and did not analyze the claims as Lanham Act falseadvertising.
Regulator will impose “conditions of service,” though not quite traditional broadcaster licensing. Certain procedural requirements: must be able to see & save a copy of the disclosures/contract w/in 15 days, via email receipt for example. Jose Antonio Arochi: Mexico doesn’t have specific regulations.
licensing) for roles. Businesses harm consumers only in a few ways—falseadvertising, monopoly prices, defective products. Amazon may also be able to redefine information by contract. Law can shape roles: set exit and entry conditions (e.g. The roles of business and consumer have been applied flatly and wrongly.
We organize all of the trending information in your field so you don't have to. Join 9,000+ users and stay up to date on the latest articles your peers are reading.
You know about us, now we want to get to know you!
Let's personalize your content
Let's get even more personalized
We recognize your account from another site in our network, please click 'Send Email' below to continue with verifying your account and setting a password.
Let's personalize your content