Remove Contracts Remove Definition Remove False Advertising
article thumbnail

Cracks in the foundation: Laches and proximate cause defeat auto glass false advertising claim

43(B)log

Safelite allegedly falsely advertised that (1) “if damage spreads beyond the size of a dollar bill, a replacement will be necessary”; (2) “when a chip is smaller than a dollar bill, it can usually be repaired without replacing the windshield.” can be safe and is viable.” Were plaintiffs’ injuries proximately caused by Safelite?

article thumbnail

copying/explicit references let Roblox proceed with dubious (c) claim; Lego should be watching

43(B)log

Roblox sued for copyright infringement, false advertising, trademark infringement, false association and false designation of origin, trade dress infringement, intentional interference with contractual relations, breach of contract, and false advertising and unfair competition under California law.

Copying 94
Insiders

Sign Up for our Newsletter

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

Trending Sources

article thumbnail

Pandemic ski resort closures allow both contract and advertising claims

43(B)log

25, 2021) Unlike the education cases so far, this pandemic case sustains both consumer protection and contract claims. The court found that plaintiffs plausibly showed that ski passes were encompassed within the definition of “services.” Alterra Mountain Co., 2021 WL 2633326, No. 20-cv-01057-RM-SKC (D.

article thumbnail

crypto lender plausibly violated UCL via unlawfulness and deceptiveness

43(B)log

The false advertising parts: Jeong alleged that Nexo advertised to consumers that it does not own users’ collateral (e.g., The court now found the breach of contract claim sufficiently pled. This allegedly breached Nexo’s duty of good faith and fair dealing and constituted a violation of California’s UCL.

article thumbnail

dueling SJ motions lose in energy drink case; jury will decide whether "Super Creatine" is "creatine"

43(B)log

Monster alleged that VPX falsely advertised Super Creatine as a source of creatine providing numerous physical and mental benefits, advertising that BANG can improve brain function, has anti-depressive effects, and helps build muscle. means, because none of the allegedly false statements actually said “source of creatine.”

article thumbnail

Advertising injury policy's IP exclusion means ROP claims aren't covered

43(B)log

The underlying lawsuit asserted misappropriation of images and likenesses for advertising purposes under state law; violation of the Virginia business conspiracy statute; and violations of the Lanham Act for false advertising and false association.

article thumbnail

Timeshare case: proof of causation/damages is difficult especially w/o grasp of Bayesian probability

43(B)log

20, 2021) In this timeshare exit false advertising litigation, the court excludes Wyndham’s expert. Timeshare exit entities like defendant TET used “online advertising and oral sales pitches to timeshare owners to convince them to sign up for TET’s service.” Sussman, 2021 WL 4948099, No. 6:18-cv-2171-GAP-DCI (M.D.