This site uses cookies to improve your experience. To help us insure we adhere to various privacy regulations, please select your country/region of residence. If you do not select a country, we will assume you are from the United States. Select your Cookie Settings or view our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Used for the proper function of the website
Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Strictly Necessary: Used for the proper function of the website
Performance/Analytics: Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
Of particular note is the application of existing principles of intellectual property (IP) law to new AI technologies. Such concerns are not limited to enterprises in the contentcreation space. As more and more companies employ artificial intelligence (AI) in their business activities, novel legal questions continue to arise.
During the slower month of August, law firms should begin working on their 2025 content calendars, planning out a contentcreation and distribution framework that aligns with the firm’s objectives and maintains audience engagement throughout the year, says Jessica Kaplan at Legally Penned.
The use of artificial intelligence (AI) in the film and television industry in contentcreation raises many legal and business issues. One key issue is the ownership of the works generated using AI and the ability to register a copyright in such works.
The Beijing Internet Court (BIC) ruled late last year that an AI-generated image in an intellectual property dispute was a new artwork protected by Chinese Continue reading
Copyright law is in charge of controlling how literary, artistic, and theatrical works, among others, are used. The law of copyright regulates the activities of copying and disseminating the words of someone who has copyright over something online without that person’s consent. 1 (2022). [5] 7] Super Cassettes Industries Ltd.
With generative artificial intelligence’s growing role in contentcreation, advertisers are leveraging AI-driven tools to enhance their marketing strategies. In today’s rapidly evolving digital landscape, the intersection of technology and entertainment raises new challenges and opportunities in the realm of talent partnerships.
In an era of contentcreation, social media influencers are tasked with the creative job of building a personal brand to influence the general publics purchasing decisions and lifestyle choices. Creating a brand identity online raises questions about intellectual property protections of these influencer-curated aesthetics.
Use these links to do so: [link] [link] [link] In this episode, Wayne Pollock joins Jordan Ostroff on his podcast, Exhibit (A)ttorney, to discuss contentcreation in the era of AI. By: Law Firm Editorial Service Here are the original show notes from the Exhibit.
Leaving aside the fact that if there were problems with the amendment, it was open to the government – and is still open to the Senate – to fix any perceived problems by amending the amendment, the reality is that Senator Gold’s explanation gets the law wrong. Last year, they attracted hundreds of millions of viewers. Section 4.1(2)
With artificial intelligence (AI) taking the world by storm and generative AI making contentcreation easier than ever, legal problems regarding intellectual property and rights to publicity have inevitably started popping up, most notably in Hollywood regarding Scarlett Johansson and the late rapper Tupac Shakur. By: Benesch
In an era of contentcreation, social media influencers are tasked with the creative job of building a personal brand to influence the general publics purchasing decisions and lifestyle choices. Creating a brand identity online raises questions about intellectual property protections of these influencer-curated aesthetics.
Candidate at Osgoode Hall Law School. Influencer culture and, by extension, contentcreation on social media, has become increasingly prevalent in recent years. In the past, content creators have had issues incorporating music into their posts due to copyright holder policies. On July 20 th , 2022, Meta Platforms Inc.
Federal copyright officials are saying proposed registrations of creative works need to include whether artificial intelligence was used in the content'screation, an evolving issue that intellectual property lawyers are tracking as it plays out before judges and government officials.
Candidate at Osgoode Hall Law School. Netflix argued that this is a direct violation of US copyright law , which provides that only copyright holders have the exclusive right to monetize and create derivative works of their IP. Raenelle Manning is an IPilogue Writer and 2L J.D. As catchy and creative as Bear and Barlow’s album is?
But the suit, in which 24-year-old influencer Sydney Nicole Gifford accuses another influencer, 22-year-old Alyssa Sheil, of copying both her posts and her style, may have an outsized effect on the law around online contentcreation. The post Does IP Law Protect Influencers Aesthetics?–Gifford –Gifford v.
Would there be any incentives to create original content? And what is the fate of copyright law in this new world order? Copyright & AI (Search) Agents Copyright law has long been the cornerstone of protecting the intellectual property (IP) rights of content creators and incentivising creativity.
The defendants failed to register as data brokers under applicable laws of California ( here ). We have also noted that this was not the only class action filed in the US against Open AI, since a parallel class action was based on alleged data breach ( here ). 4th 1149 (9th Cir. 161 recalling the precedent Calhoun v.
Recent court decisions have clarified the scope of copyright in film screenplays, personality rights, and underlying works concerning contentcreation and licensing in broadcasting. and undoubtedly creating such content includes the distribution of any intellectual property rights to their respective authors.
AI tools offer unprecedented assistance in contentcreation, from automated editing to graphic design, and push the boundaries of creativity. This article explores the intricate world of AI and copyright, providing insights and guidance for those at the forefront of digital contentcreation. Understanding the U.S.
Sally Yoon is an IPilogue Writer, IP Innovation Clinic Fellow, and a 3L JD Candidate at Osgoode Hall Law School. This past summer, Amazon made headlines when it announced an update that would make Alexa capable of impersonating deceased family members , just after hearing under a minute of audio. million Canadian Dollars.
AI is altering the way the creation, consumption, and security of digital content and comes up with creative solutions for complicated problems dealing with data analysis and contentcreation. hence, Updates and amendments to IP laws are much required to handle this.
The court concluded that there cannot be a monopoly in such creative domains, highlighting that while ideas themselves are not copyrightable, the way they are expressed can be subject to law.
AI tools offer unprecedented assistance in contentcreation, from automated editing to graphic design, and push the boundaries of creativity. This article explores the intricate world of AI and copyright, providing insights and guidance for those at the forefront of digital contentcreation. Understanding the U.S.
Initially, there was a focus on the actual existence of creations and inventions, as it is a commonly known fact that ideas aren’t protected under IP law. With businesses moving more and more towards it, it is impossible for IP laws not to interact with the metaverse. – Data protection and privacy issues.
Kuik started his professional career at CIC Video International , shortly after he graduated from law school 42 years ago. In part, perhaps, because BREIN often found the law on its side in courts. The greatest defeat came in a Usenet-related lawsuit, where the court ultimately ruled that the provider was not violating copyright law.
It also provides new contentcreation capabilities. Generative AI offers unprecedented opportunities for companies of all stages of growth. It can provide time and cost efficiencies, allowing companies to focus resources on other business priorities. But Generative AI also presents new legal and business risks. By: Cooley LLP
The recent rise in popularity of generative artificial intelligence–powered applications such as ChatGPT poses important copyright issues for individuals and businesses with respect to contentcreation, including the scope of rights with respect to commercial use, content publication, potential liability for infringement, and content enforcement.
Law firms driving AI adoption yet exposed to copyright risks Law firms are at the forefront of AI adoption, with 97% of respondents reporting they “regularly” or “often” use AI tools. This shift is fundamentally redefining what it means to practice law in 2025.
laws that stifle contentcreation efforts through unfair copyright enforcement mechanisms. The issue lies mostly in how the DMCA incentivizes online service providers to "expeditiously" handle licensing issues.
It receives the full set of rights under copyright law, just like literary, dramatic, or artistic work”. Unlike other works, a song isn’t treated as a single entity under the law. India recently witnessed a landmark case involving AI and copyright law. When it comes to songs, copyright gets pretty interesting.
With the ever-expanding landscape of contentcreation and dissemination, professionals in this field must have a solid understanding of copyright implications. Understanding Copyright Basics Protected Content Copyright law protects a wide range of creative works, including written materials, images, music, movies, and more.
While patents and trademarks often receive the lion’s share of an organization’s intellectual property focus, copyrights comprise a critical third prong to a healthy overarching IP strategy – even for companies whose products and services involve little or no contentcreation. Francisco Cabrera López , Associate, Foley Hoag LLP.
One area where AI has already made significant inroads is in contentcreation. With the help of AI-powered writing assistants, businesses and individuals can generate high-quality content with minimal effort. Copyright law protects original works of authorship, including literary works like blog articles.
If viewers are able to access these contents for free then the amount of revenue generated from licensing of intellectual property will be far below estimations. Video contentcreation involves substantial investment. Measures to Prevent Piracy Digital Rights Management (DRM) technologies are employed to encrypt the content.
The concept of “embedding” content is not a new phenomenon. Ever since the massive explosion of contentcreation that gave rise to social media, content creators worldwide have utilized embedding to showcase and link users to content that otherwise would not have been as readily accessible.
copyright law protects only works of human authorship, and the defendant, Stephen Thaler, expressly told the Copyright Office that the work at issue, titled “A Recent Entrance to Paradise,” “lack[ed] traditional human authorship.” That answers the question when human involvement in contentcreation is a binary switch–either on or off.
Furthermore, in the past, when someone tried to make an IP claim in the court of law for possession, the middlemen and bureaucracy used to create chaos in everything. If you decide to store your IP assets using blockchain, you must seek the assistance of a professional attorney trained in Intellectual Property Law.
This historic ruling created a precedent for companies looking to protect their trademarks in the metaverse and sparked debate about whether Non-Fungible Tokens (NFT) are protected by intellectual property laws. That may include decentralized contentcreation platforms, IP registries on a blockchain, and smart contract licensing systems.
The Internet is exponentially growing; and along with it Internet-based digital contentcreation. Those users are generating millions of posts, videos, blogs, images.every type of content imaginable; content readily accessible to millions of people all around the world. They need rich, diverse, and real-world content.
Although intellectual property is not the main objective of the Artificial Intelligence Regulation (AIR), the impact of these technologies in some sectors with intensive contentcreation has led to the inclusion of certain requirements in this area.
intellectual property laws, copyright protection only exists where there is human selection and arrangement of information; there is no copyright protection for material generated by a non-human. [4] law, to receive trade secret protection, a company must make a reasonable effort to conceal that information from the public.
The Copyright Office’s current position is a classic “hard cases make bad law” situation. law as well. Control” Means Control of Instrumentalities The “control” required by the Copyright Office in arriving at the Kashtanova registration decision does not appear to be the same control discussed in relevant case law.
The digital revolution has moved legal questions about copyright, information, and competition law to the regulatory centre of the creative industries. This makes it even more crucial to understand the avenues for innovation and creativity the law unleashes, while identifying the limits it may place on commercial activities.
v] Instead, these companies often opt to shift the associated risk of contentcreation and navigating licensing on to the creators themselves and wait until the last minute to implement more sensible, less destructive solutions that may cost them a bit more than doing nothing.
We organize all of the trending information in your field so you don't have to. Join 9,000+ users and stay up to date on the latest articles your peers are reading.
You know about us, now we want to get to know you!
Let's personalize your content
Let's get even more personalized
We recognize your account from another site in our network, please click 'Send Email' below to continue with verifying your account and setting a password.
Let's personalize your content