Remove Confidentiality Remove Designs Remove Document
article thumbnail

(Over) Expanding the Circle: DHC Allows In-house Employees to Access Confidential Documents in InterDigital v. Oppo

SpicyIP

In June 2024, I covered some nuances regarding confidentiality and disclosures in the SB and DB orders passed in InterDigital Technology Corporation vs. Guangdong OPPO Mobile Telecommunications Corp. The tussle for revealing documentation between InterDigital an Oppo has been going on for some time now. Ltd ( here and here ).

article thumbnail

Defending Design Patents

Patently-O

In our new paper, The Truth About Design Patents , we debunk three widely held—but incorrect—views about U.S. design patents. Taken together, these myths paint a grim picture of design patents: Half of all design patent applications are rejected. Most asserted design patents are invalidated in litigation.

Insiders

Sign Up for our Newsletter

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

article thumbnail

Printed Publication: Documents Made Available only to Customers

Patently-O

A new petition asks the court to examine the phrase again and help define when a document crosses the publication threshold. In particular, the petition asks whether documents made available only to customers, and not generally to the public, count as being published. Centripetal Networks, Inc. Cisco Systems, Inc. , 869, 877 (Fed.

article thumbnail

Minnesota’s Attempt to Copy California’s Constitutionally Defective Age Appropriate Design Code is an Utter Fail (Guest Blog Post)

Technology & Marketing Law Blog

Despite the California Legislature’s blunder last year with AB 2273 (the Age Appropriate Design Code), many states, including Minnesota, are stubbornly pushing for nearly identical laws. Plus, DPIAs pose potential security risks due to the sensitive and confidential nature of the information contained within the reports.

Copying 133
article thumbnail

Anti-Piracy Company Asks Court to Keep Filings Secret as TorrentFreak Might Report On Them

TorrentFreak

This information includes documents, source code, and witness testimony regarding the company’s efforts to track online pirates. MarkMonitor believes that the requested information is confidential and asks the court to keep it out of the public’s view. MarkMonitor Evidence. However, the argumentation certainly stands out.

Reporting 145
article thumbnail

Emails Analyzing Own Patents Likely Not Trade Secrets

Patently-O

by Dennis Crouch In most patent cases, the parties jointly agree to a system limiting the publication of confidential case information and typically file a stipulated motion for protective order seeking the a judicial order requiring the parties to comply. US11147246 and US11033007.

article thumbnail

UK IPO consultation on trade mark and design services

The IPKat

This second consultation focuses on specific trade marks and designs issues, but also includes some proposals on patents and tribunals. This will remove the outdated requirement for members of the public to attend the IPO’s offices in person or order copies of documents to view this information.

Design 70