This site uses cookies to improve your experience. To help us insure we adhere to various privacy regulations, please select your country/region of residence. If you do not select a country, we will assume you are from the United States. Select your Cookie Settings or view our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Used for the proper function of the website
Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Strictly Necessary: Used for the proper function of the website
Performance/Analytics: Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
This paradigm, however, breaks down when copyright ownership is contested. In that circumstance, the takedown notice becomes a proxy battle for a larger and likely fact-dependent war over ownership, which the service in the middle isn’t in a good position to resolve. The hosting service honored the takedown notice.
Copyright Infringement/FairUse. The Crony graphic appeared as the video’s thumbnail image and in the video’s first 10 seconds, so it was not a de minimis use. The Crony graphic also doesn’t qualify for fairuse: Nature of Use. The court rejects Goodman’s motion to dismiss.
This is a copyright ownership dispute that spilled over to Spotify, who received takedown notices. Barrett Financial * 512(f) Once Again Ensnared in an Employment Ownership DisputeShande v. Heldman * Another 512(f) Claim FailsNingbo Mizhihe v Doe * Video Excerpts Qualify as FairUse (and Another 512(f) Claim Fails)Hughes v.
Despite UMG’s lack of ownership in the beat, UMG’s “content protection specialist” found the song Oi! It’s not like UMG had some colorable reason to think it owned the beat; its takedown notice was the direct and foreseeable consequence of its own incomplete tracking of its asset ownership and licensing status.
Heldman. * Another 512(f) Claim Fails–Ningbo Mizhihe v Doe. * Video Excerpts Qualify as FairUse (and Another 512(f) Claim Fails)–Hughes v. New Destiny Church. * ‘Reaction’ Video Protected By FairUse–Hosseinzadeh v. Klein. * 9th Circuit Sides With FairUse in Dancing Baby Takedown Case–Lenz v.
“Plaintiff’s takedown letters and supporting document establish facially plausible claims of infringement, and Babybus does not allege a plausible basis for a fairuse defense.” Heldman. * Another 512(f) Claim Fails–Ningbo Mizhihe v Doe. * Video Excerpts Qualify as FairUse (and Another 512(f) Claim Fails)–Hughes v.
Heldman. * Another 512(f) Claim Fails–Ningbo Mizhihe v Doe. * Video Excerpts Qualify as FairUse (and Another 512(f) Claim Fails)–Hughes v. New Destiny Church. * ‘Reaction’ Video Protected By FairUse–Hosseinzadeh v. Klein. * 9th Circuit Sides With FairUse in Dancing Baby Takedown Case–Lenz v.
Construing these allegations as true and in Service’s favor, Service subjectively believed that he possessed an ownership interest and that he never approved the Comedy Dynamics deal. I’m pretty sure the drafters of 512(f) never contemplated that it would be invoked in disputes over ownership. Federici * Biosafe-One v.
Heldman. * Another 512(f) Claim Fails–Ningbo Mizhihe v Doe. * Video Excerpts Qualify as FairUse (and Another 512(f) Claim Fails)–Hughes v. New Destiny Church. * ‘Reaction’ Video Protected By FairUse–Hosseinzadeh v. Klein. * 9th Circuit Sides With FairUse in Dancing Baby Takedown Case–Lenz v.
Heldman * Another 512(f) Claim Fails–Ningbo Mizhihe v Doe * Video Excerpts Qualify as FairUse (and Another 512(f) Claim Fails)–Hughes v. New Destiny Church * ‘Reaction’ Video Protected By FairUse–Hosseinzadeh v. Klein * 9th Circuit Sides With FairUse in Dancing Baby Takedown Case–Lenz v.
Heldman. * Another 512(f) Claim Fails–Ningbo Mizhihe v Doe. * Video Excerpts Qualify as FairUse (and Another 512(f) Claim Fails)–Hughes v. New Destiny Church. * ‘Reaction’ Video Protected By FairUse–Hosseinzadeh v. Klein. * 9th Circuit Sides With FairUse in Dancing Baby Takedown Case–Lenz v.
The Rusty Krab court expands upon these points in its subsequent section detailing findings of law, but its discussion is fairly conclusory, mainly comprising maxims about what a parody is and isn’t rather than specific discussion of the defendants’ use and why it fails to qualify.
Barrett Financial * 512(f) Once Again Ensnared in an Employment Ownership DisputeShande v. Heldman * Another 512(f) Claim FailsNingbo Mizhihe v Doe * Video Excerpts Qualify as FairUse (and Another 512(f) Claim Fails)Hughes v. New Destiny Church * Reaction Video Protected By Fair UseHosseinzadeh v. Zoox * Surprise!
Because ownership of original works, like a tattoo, vests with the author (here the tattoo artist), the tattoo artist owned the copyright in the tattoo, even though it was physically on the someone else’s body. Netflix moved to dismiss the complaint on, among other grounds, fairuse. Lynn Goldsmith, et al. , Koons , 467 F.3d
Netflix could have sent Barlow & Bear a cease and desist letter hand-delivered by Regé-Jean Page. While Barlow & Bear may now try to argue that their work constitutes fairuse, it’s a weak defense in this case. Barlow & Bear claim copyright ownership in “The Unofficial Bridgerton Musical.”
At least one medical device manufacturer took issue with the online library and sent iFixit a cease-and-desist letter, citing its exclusive rights under copyright to reproduce and communicate the repair information online. Citing the U.S. Citing the U.S. by Alexander Puutio. € by Edward J.
The court also credits the self-serving claim by the successor licensee that it considered fairuse by comparing the works and evaluating if the works were being sold commercially or for other purposes. New Destiny Church. * ‘Reaction’ Video Protected By FairUse–Hosseinzadeh v. Federici. * Biosafe-One v.
Prior Posts on Section 512(f) * 512(f) Once Again Ensnared in an Employment Ownership Dispute–Shande v. Heldman * Another 512(f) Claim Fails–Ningbo Mizhihe v Doe * Video Excerpts Qualify as FairUse (and Another 512(f) Claim Fails)–Hughes v. New Destiny Church * ‘Reaction’ Video Protected By FairUse–Hosseinzadeh v.
Because ownership of original works, like a tattoo, vests with the author (here the tattoo artist), the tattoo artist owned the copyright in the tattoo, even though it was physically on the someone else’s body. Netflix moved to dismiss the complaint on, among other grounds, fairuse. Lynn Goldsmith, et al. , Koons , 467 F.3d
2] Dash originally planned to use SuperFarm, an NFT website, to mint and sell the NFT of the album. [3] Following the announcement, Roc-A-Fella’s attorneys sent cease-and-desist letters to SuperFarm and Dash. However, Damon lacked any individual interest in the copyright. [2] As a result, SuperFarm cancelled the auction. [5]
Barrett Financial * 512(f) Once Again Ensnared in an Employment Ownership DisputeShande v. Heldman * Another 512(f) Claim FailsNingbo Mizhihe v Doe * Video Excerpts Qualify as FairUse (and Another 512(f) Claim Fails)Hughes v. New Destiny Church * Reaction Video Protected By Fair UseHosseinzadeh v. Zoox * Surprise!
In those circusmtances, copyright law is an especially attractive tool to the pugilists, with its strict liability standards, amorphous fairuse boundaries, high defense costs, and effectiveness of takedown notices. Levy argued that Kilgore didn’t consider fairuse before sending the takedown notices.
Bibas Kicks It Upstairs The first case to directly address fairuse in AI training is now heading to a federal appeals court, as Judge Stephanos Bibas has decided to certify an interlocutory appeal in Thomson Reuters v. Ownership of exclusive rights is not to be conflated with exclusive ownership of rights, the court explained.
We organize all of the trending information in your field so you don't have to. Join 9,000+ users and stay up to date on the latest articles your peers are reading.
You know about us, now we want to get to know you!
Let's personalize your content
Let's get even more personalized
We recognize your account from another site in our network, please click 'Send Email' below to continue with verifying your account and setting a password.
Let's personalize your content