article thumbnail

The 5 Worst Copyright Decisions of 2024

Copyright Lately

The court also found willful infringement based on Chicken Joes profanity-laden response to the plaintiffs cease-and-desist letter: The most disappointing part of the email? Admittedly, it’s not a textbook cease-and-desist response. Fair Use Declawed. That Chicken Joes is owned by a guy named John.

Copyright 116
article thumbnail

The skinny on fair use

Likelihood of Confusion

Walter Olson rounds it up: Ralph Lauren lawyers: dont you dare reproduce our skinny-model photo in the course of criticizing our use of skinny models [BoingBoing] With photoshop, evidently, quite a bit! Here’s an excerpt from […] The post The skinny on fair use appeared first on LIKELIHOOD OF CONFUSION.

Insiders

Sign Up for our Newsletter

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

article thumbnail

RightsClick Offers Simplified Copyright Management

Plagiarism Today

The Assess Tool also provides a basic fair use analysis and helps to make sure that the use isn’t covered under any other exceptions to copyright law. The first is sending a cease and desist letter.

Copyright 348
article thumbnail

3 Count: NFT Repeat

Plagiarism Today

Fitzpatrick’s videos includes reviews of manga and anime offerings and often makes use of the source material but in a limited capacity. According to Fitzpatrick, he ensures that himself and those that work for him follow both YouTube’s fair use policy and the various countries that they operate in.

article thumbnail

3 Count: Warhol Battle

Plagiarism Today

However, after Prince died in 2016, it was revealed that Warhol actually made an additional 14 prints using the photograph. The Appeals Court ruled against the Warhol estate finding that the images in question were not a fair use. Lynn sued allegiging that those prints were a copyright infringement.

article thumbnail

Supreme Court Finds Warhol’s Commercial Licensing of “Orange Prince” to Vanity Fair Is Not Fair Use and Infringes Goldsmith’s Famed Rock Photo

Intellectual Property Law Blog

s (AWF), [1] in a long-awaited decision impacting fair use under Section 107(1) of the Copyright Act. Goldsmith and, as a result, did not constitute fair use. [2] Goldsmith was not paid or credited for this use. 107), “when it conveys a different meaning or message from its source material.”

Fair Use 130
article thumbnail

3 Count: Extrinsic vs. Intrinsic

Plagiarism Today

The owners of Grease sent a cease and desist letter in August 2019 that resulted in performances of Vape being cancelled. According to the judge, Vape is a fair use as its goal is to be a parody of the source material and not meant to replace it in the marketplace.