512(f) Plaintiff Must Pay $91k to the Defense–Digital Marketing v. McCandless
Technology & Marketing Law Blog
DECEMBER 5, 2022
Case Citation : Digital Marketing Advisors v. Day to Day Imports. * Satirical Depiction in YouTube Video Gets Rough Treatment in Court. * 512(f) Preempts Tortious Interference Claim–Copy Me That v. Summit Entertainment. * Cease & Desist Letter to iTunes Isn’t Covered by 17 USC 512(f)–Red Rock v. Alper Automotive v.
Let's personalize your content