This site uses cookies to improve your experience. To help us insure we adhere to various privacy regulations, please select your country/region of residence. If you do not select a country, we will assume you are from the United States. Select your Cookie Settings or view our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Used for the proper function of the website
Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Strictly Necessary: Used for the proper function of the website
Performance/Analytics: Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
On January 1, 2022, works that were first published in the year 1926 lapsed into the publicdomain. Disney acquired the rights to the book and its characters in 1961 and, since then, has released a steady stream of movies, TV shows and products featuring the book’s cast of characters. What Actually Happened.
You may have heard that on January 1, 2022, Winnie-the-Pooh and the other characters from the Hundred Acre Wood are now in the publicdomain. But did you know that not all of Christopher Robin’s friends are treated the same in the eyes of copyrightlaw? The characters have multiple authors, including A.A.
In today’s world, copyrightlaws are essential for protecting creative works like books. For business owners, publishers, and sellers, understanding copyright can prevent legal issues and ensure fair use of content. Copyright grants the author or creator exclusive rights to use, distribute, and sell their work.
Publicdomain works are freeunless misinformation and aggressive claims deter the public from freely using them. publicdomain 95 years after their initial publication by Belgian artist Herg. January 27, 2025 email from Tintinimaginatio to Duke Law’s Center for the Study of the PublicDomain.
Last weekend, shadow library Anna’s Archive argued that, for AI companies, access to ‘pirated’ books may be a matter of national security. “Meta downloaded millions of pirated books from LibGen through the bit torrent protocol using a platform called LibTorrent. copyrightlaw.
The lawsuit claimed that the site was offering illegal downloads of their books and specifically targeted two Ukrainian nationals as the operators. Finally today, The Associated Press reports that, with the new year, several prominent works are lapsing into the publicdomain including the Ernest Hemingway novel The Sun Also Rises and A.A.
On 1st January every year we celebrate the array of works entering the publicdomain, as their copyright term expires. This year, entering the publicdomain [generally speaking] are copyright protected works created by people who died in 1953, for countries with a copyright term of life plus 70 years (e.g.,
This is a review of Research Handbook on Intellectual Property and Cultural Heritage , edited by Irini Stamatoudi , Professor of Intellectual Property Law and Cultural Heritage Law at the University of Nicosia. The book is presented in three main parts.
‘Overhaul CopyrightLaw to Protect National Security’ Shortly after we published an article on the AI “forbidden fruit” conundrum and potential consequences, site operator Anna Archivist published a call to action , stressing the need for a strong and urgent response. This leads to the second proposal. .”
copyrightlaw, a particularly confusing subject for foreign works published before 1978. copyrightlaw. The defendants argued , among other things, that Bundy erred in application of Twin Books , because it does not apply to works which have been published in the U.S. Copyright Act of 1909.
But for IP types, perhaps their most notable accomplishment was the revenge that they took upon the copyright system. And, while the copyrightlaws were used to try to keep the film from public view, ultimately it failed, to the continuing benefit of cinematic creation. Vampire folklore had been passed down for centuries.
where it held that the Google Books Library Project, which consists of scanning and making searchable the book collections of major research libraries, did not produce a competing substitute for the books. As pointed out by Keith Aoki, James Boyle and Jennifer Jenkins in Bound by Law? Google, Inc. by Tito Rendas. €
The new lawsuit raises a host of complicated legal issues that, while exciting for copyright nerds like me, are often a nightmare to litigate. Key among them is the extent to which pre-1978 works first published abroad without proper copyright notice are still protected under U.S. copyrightlaw. on November 16, 1949.
As a plant intellectual property nerd , this Kat was delighted to get her hands on the new book Intellectual Property and the Design of Nature (Oxford University Press, 2023), edited by Jose Bellido and Brad Sherman. The other two chapters turn to the conceptualisation of nature in patent law.
Now in its second edition, the book offers a perspective on how one can address the overlap between intellectual property (IP) rights, either to reconcile them in whole or in part, or to pre-empt one over the other. The book closes with Chapter 21 by Susy Frankel, focusing on the interactions between IP and traditional knowledge (TK).
This is a book review of “ Harmonizing Intellectual Property Law for a Trans-Atlantic Knowledge Economy ”, edited by Péter Mezei, Hannibal Travis, and Anett Pogácsás. This model addresses the legal publicdomain status of both physical and intangible AI creations and inventions. A meow-velous cover!
This is a book review of the Research Handbook on Intellectual Property and Moral Rights , curated by Ysolde Gendreau (Université de Montréal, Canada), provided by Francesca Mazzi , Lecturer in AI, Innovation and Law at Brunel University London. Such gestures couldn't be overlooked in a book on moral rights.
Also included in the archive are IViRs comprehensive study on the harmonization of European copyrightlaw , as well as the first two editions of Paul Torremans monumental collection on the intersection between intellectual property and human rights. More volumes will be added to the online archive in due course.
Introduction Controlled Digital Lending (“ CDL ”) in context of book lending became a buzzword during the pandemic period when the physical access of libraries was not possible. This rule covers lending digital copies of copyrighted works, while works in the publicdomain can be freely digitized.
Dear Rich: As I understand copyright, if I visit a park and take a photo of a statute, I own the copyright to the photo and I can use it in a book. But if I open a magazine and take a photo of an illustration, I still own the copyright to the photo, but using it in a book would be a copyright violation.
Katfriend Dr Sabine Jacques , Associate Professor in IP, IT & Media law at the University of East Anglia and author of The Parody Exception in CopyrightLaw (OUP 2019), provides the follow review of The Copyright/Trademark Interface: How the Expansion of Trademark Protection is Stifling Cultural Creativity – by Martin Senftleben.
They accuse OpenAI of using books as training data, without permission, relying on datasets that were sourced from pirate sites. Fair use is a defense that is typically not used to dismiss copyright infringement claims before they’re properly argued. copyrightlaw.
A pre-trained model is already trained on a large dataset of books, articles, web pages, etc., The training dataset consisted of the free and open Common Crawl dataset (a trillion words, terabytes of data), WebText (collected by OpenAI by scraping links), two internet-based books corpora, Books1 and Books2 (COPYRIGHT ALERT!!!
In last week’s ruling in Hachette Book Group, Inc. Internet Archive (read the opinion here) , the court dealt a decisive blow to the Internet Archive, ruling that its practice of scanning and lending digital copies of books doesn’t qualify as fair use under the Copyright Act. At least, that was the idea.
Blog sought to study global moves or court cases that have taken place regarding uses of copyright in made-always-with-an-AI creation and provide discussion over possible solutions to the future of intellectual property laws. Copyright Act regulates the works which are created by humans only.
This brings us to the discussion of their personality rights, which confer upon an individual the exclusive right to govern how their persona is depicted in the publicdomain, particularly for commercial purposes.
The stakes are particularly high in copyrightlaw, where anthropomorphic thinking has led to problematic comparisons between human learning and AI training. When humans read books, we do not make copies of themwe understand and internalize concepts. ” These human terms feel natural, but they are misleading.
Despite the publication date, I can't tell if this book is in the US publicdomain. It appears to have been only published in the UK, and I've seen evidence the copyright was renewed in the 30's. I have a recent UK copy of the book, and it has no copyright notice.
The list of complainants includes record labels, book authors, visual artists, and newspapers, including the New York Times. “OpenAI claims that the reporters’ notes underlying the asserted works may shed light on whether The Times’s news articles are really original, expressive content—but that is not how copyrightlaw works.
But, as an exception, the doctrine of merger provides that if the expression of an idea is merged with the idea itself, then such an expression can also be denied copyright protectio n. The absence of this doctrine would defeat the very purpose of copyrightlaw. qualifies for copyright protection. Seldon (1879).
You can always get drunk and order random stuff on Amazon curl up with a scary book or Halloween-themed movie, game or music video that’s found its way into copyright history. In 1917, author Mark Twain had already been dead for seven years, but that didn’t stop him from writing a new book—allegedly. Skully Curly.
Here, merely automated and mechanical work that lacks originality is also protected by the said copyright doctrine. For instance, in accordance with this doctrine, the author would be entitled to copyright protection if someone collected different poems that were previously in the publicdomain and produced in a single document.
Copyright protection exists from the time the work is created in a fixed, tangible form of expression. The copyright in the work of authorship immediately becomes the property of the author who created the work. Here is a breakdown of where U.S. songs, music, spoken word, sounds, and other recordings) Audiovisual works (e.g.,
book publishers, rejecting the Internet Archive’s argument that its practice of scanning and lending digital copies of books qualifies as fair use under the Copyright Act. Once the loan period expires, the electronic book is “returned” to the library and becomes inaccessible to the person who checked it out.
All copyrights, except one, expire.*. Preface: I wanted to learn more about the concept (and applications) of “derivative works” and adaptations under copyrightlaw, and I was searching for a useful example that might also be interesting for readers of Velocity of Content to read about. Hart & Rick Castle.”
Fair use provides some exceptions to copyright protection, allowing limited use of copyrighted material without the permission of the copyright owner. CopyrightLaw Copy Right is a legal concept that gives creators exclusive rights over their original works and allows them to control the use and distribution of those works.
Srinath R vs M/S Reliance Broadcast Network Ltd on 4 December, 2024 (Bangalore District Court) Image from here The plaintiff owned the copyright for the book titled Madhurya Sarvabhouma Dr. P.B. P.B.Srinivas which was available in publicdomain and it is not any person’s created copyright or created literature to be infringed.
In doing so, it calls into question a fundamental assumption of many traditional intellectual property (IP) frameworks as copyrightlaws only protect works created by humans and not AI. And if someone substantially edits AI-generated data and claims copyright on the edited work, they could potentially qualify for copyright protection.
By voting to limit the period of copyright, the House of Lords created the PublicDomain. The decisive events in London from 1710 to 1774 determined the course of modern Anglo-American copyright. The influenced the American Copyright Statute of 1790. We talk about authors when we talk about copyright.
Indeed, human creators seek compensation for the novel use of their intellectual efforts while AI firms aim to maximize the free harvesting of data (including copyright-protected materials) for training their algorithms. On 21 February 2023, the USCO reviewed the registration of the comic book “Zarya of the Dawn” (Registration No.
Freed from the shackles of copyright, Walt Disney’s iconic rodent was now in the publicdomain and, therefore, available for everyone to copy. It is no surprise that the legalities of the publicdomain are more complicated than the headlines suggest. Trademark law has something to say about use.
To that end, this blog addresses how the Egyptian copyrightlaw (ECL) regulates intermediaries’ liability when it comes to copyright-related infringements. What lessons, if any, should the Egyptian copyright legislator retain from the CJEU’s last words on the liability regime of the ECD? For further lessons, stay tuned ….
New Copyrighted Works Enter the PublicDomain: In 1998, the Sonny Bono Copyright Term Extension Act added 20 years to the term of copyright protection for pre-1976 works, and paused the annual expiration of copyright on older works for 20 years. the exclusive right to their respective writings.”
For the last few months, I have been wondering if our belief in “fair dealing” (or broadly, “limitations and exceptions”) has silently slipped into our “faith” in it – a faith that demands complete surrender to it while blinding us to the harm it covertly causes to the publicdomain. Read Section 2(iii) of the Indian Copyright Act ).
We organize all of the trending information in your field so you don't have to. Join 9,000+ users and stay up to date on the latest articles your peers are reading.
You know about us, now we want to get to know you!
Let's personalize your content
Let's get even more personalized
We recognize your account from another site in our network, please click 'Send Email' below to continue with verifying your account and setting a password.
Let's personalize your content