This site uses cookies to improve your experience. To help us insure we adhere to various privacy regulations, please select your country/region of residence. If you do not select a country, we will assume you are from the United States. Select your Cookie Settings or view our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Used for the proper function of the website
Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Strictly Necessary: Used for the proper function of the website
Performance/Analytics: Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
Arnav is a 3rd Year Law student from Rajiv Gandhi National University of Law, Punjab. He’s interested in Narratives and the Law, along with supporting local independent bookstores. Virginia Woolf, How Should One Read a Book?, Kindle users will still be able to download and transfer purchased books via Wi-Fi.
Discussing the decision of the US Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit in Hachette Book Group v. She graduated from National Law University, Delhi in 2023 & enjoys reading and writing on copyrightlaws. Several users could borrow a scanned book at once. Tanishka is an advocate at the High Court of MP.
This is a book review of The Future of Intellectual Property , edited by Daniel J. Underwood Chair in Law at Vanderbilt University Law School, US. In the introduction, Gervais explains that the approach to discussing IP law reform taken in this edited collection is considering both primary and secondary level reform.
Back in January, the crypto group Spice DAO (decentralized autonomous organization) made headlines for spending approximately $3 million to acquire a physical copy of the book Jodorowsky’s Dune , a bible for a planned Dune move that would have been made in the 1970s. . After winning the book, the group announced their plans.
This is a book review of Teaching Intellectual Property Law: Strategy and Management edited by Sabine Jacques, Associate Professor in Information Technology, Media and Intellectual Property Law, University of East Anglia Law School and Ruth Soetendorp, Visiting Academic, City University of London and Professor Emerita, Bournemouth University.
This is a review of Research Handbook on Intellectual Property and Cultural Heritage , edited by Irini Stamatoudi , Professor of Intellectual Property Law and Cultural Heritage Law at the University of Nicosia. The book is presented in three main parts.
Introduction The principle of the first sale doctrine is a basic precept of copyrightlaw allowing the lawful possessor of a copyrighted work to resell, lend, or distribute that work without the permission of the copyright holder. The CJEU held, in Tom Kabinet v.
Copyrightlaw is in charge of controlling how literary, artistic, and theatrical works, among others, are used. The law of copyright regulates the activities of copying and disseminating the words of someone who has copyright over something online without that person’s consent.
This is quite the picture of how the Indian copyrightlaws are treating the employees who try to become such exceptional creators. the ownership disputes in India and the U.K. WHEN DOES THE EMPLOYEE OWN THE COPYRIGHT? The Indian judiciary has to restructure the scope and extent of the Copyrightlaws in India.
This development has led legal commentators to observe that, unfortunately, the copyrightlaw surrounding celebrity tattoos remains unclear. Copyright protection over tattoos has been a hot topic for some time. However, numerous considerations give pause for thought when it comes to copyright and tattoos.
copyrightlaw, a particularly confusing subject for foreign works published before 1978. copyrightlaw. The defendants argued , among other things, that Bundy erred in application of Twin Books , because it does not apply to works which have been published in the U.S. Copyright Act of 1909. law, the U.K.
Now in its second edition, the book offers a perspective on how one can address the overlap between intellectual property (IP) rights, either to reconcile them in whole or in part, or to pre-empt one over the other. The book closes with Chapter 21 by Susy Frankel, focusing on the interactions between IP and traditional knowledge (TK).
This is a book review provided by former PermaKat, Neil Wilkof. To paraphrase Jane Austen, it is a truth universally acknowledged that a book about authors, drama, or publishing before the modern era will likely have been written by a scholar of literature and culture rather than by a legal researcher. Read, learn, and enjoy.
This book review of Intellectual Property Law in Nigeria: Emerging Trends, Theories And Practice by Desmond Oriakhogba (University of the Western Cape, South Africa) and Ifeoluwa Olubiyi (Afe Babaloloa University, Ado-Ekiti, Nigeria) is kindly provided by Kasim Waziri , Professor of Law at the University of Abuja, Nigeria.
In addition to archiving the web, IA also operates a library that offers a broad collection of digital media, including books. Staying true to the centuries-old library concept, IA patrons can also borrow books that are scanned and digitized in-house. This is a feature of copyrightlaw, not a bug,” the brief reads.
There was a recent story that is an instructive lesson in copyrightlaw that has application to the NFT market. The article titled “Cryptobros spent $3 million on Dune book, believing it gave them copyright. Learn more about NFT Copyright Issues here. The NFT bought the Dune book for 2.6 What Are NFTs?
Kat- quotation There is little doubt that one of the most (if not the most) significant exceptions in copyrightlaw is the one relating to quotation, criticism or review. In 2014, the Milan Court of First Instance dismissed the action in its entirety. A final appeal to the Italian Supreme Court followed.
The general consensus is that copyrightlaw favors the publishers, but in a recent motion to dismiss, Elbakyan had other things on her mind too. The agreements pertain to the publication of books; Elbakyan is accused of distributing articles. In the meantime, Sci-Hub has received some unexpected news.
Prompt Engineering is defined in the Stable Diffusion Prompt book as “ the process of structuring words that can be interpreted and understood by a text-to-image model. The choice not to define computer programs was intended precisely to futureproof the law. Are prompts code? However, the difference is relevant.
Legally, when we talk about “music under copyright,” we’re referring to the ownership of the composition or recording itself. This ownership grants the holder exclusive rights to its distribution and reproduction, as well as the ability to license it and earn royalties.
NFTs Are Not Copyrightable. The confusion only seems to increase when you introduce copyright into the mix. Again, NFTs are just an ownership record and a link to content. If they don’t embed an underlying asset, they likely don’t even fall within the subject matter of copyright. American Lithographic Co.
In this part II we discuss two additional aspects, with a focus on UK copyrightlaw and the EU copyright acquis. The First Sale Doctrine in the Metaverse The first sale doctrine, also referred to as the ‘ principle of exhaustion’ , is a longstanding tenet of copyright (and more in general intellectual property) law.
Inventorship and Ownership: The process of invention has changed significantly as a result of the AI technologies’ quick development and increased computing capacity. As AI-generated works blur the lines of authorship and ownership, existing IP frameworks face significant tests, calling for responsive legal adaptations.
Highlights of the Week Taking Stock of ANI vs OpenAI Copyright Litigation- Part I With interventions from book and digital publishers in the ANI vs OpenAI copyright litigation, the Delhi HC will begin hearing arguments in the ANI-OpenAI Copyright dispute from February 21. Anything we are missing out on?
Blog sought to study global moves or court cases that have taken place regarding uses of copyright in made-always-with-an-AI creation and provide discussion over possible solutions to the future of intellectual property laws. Copyright Act regulates the works which are created by humans only.
Two iconic book covers that later became the posters for the film adaptations Dear Rich: My company is wanting to hire an illustrator to do the cover of our travel book. Below is a sample agreement that's based on our downloadable work-for-hire contract on our Crafts Law website. copyrightlaw.
10] [Image Sources: Shutterstock] The right to publicity (personality rights) may also be construed as a property right, when commercial value is derived from an individual’s persona, and its ownership parallels that of tangible property. 11] WHY THE CONTEMPORARY SITUATION BEST BE DEALT WITH CODIFICATION OF PERSONALITY RIGHTS?
Other Posts Hachette Book Group v Internet Archive: Archiving Access to Information or Strengthening CopyrightLaws? Discussing the US decision in Hachette Book Group v. The defendant did not claim ownership of the “Levi’s” trademark and only denied selling such goods.
Book publishers followed closely the adoption of this legislation as the vast majority of its provisions concern them directly, from new copyright exceptions to contractual rules between authors and their partners.
Photo by Udo Pohlmann via Pixabay Over the last decades, European lawyers got used to the – at times remarkable and even forceful – interventions of the Court of Justice of the EU (CJEU) in copyrightlaw. The Safarov case In 2009, Safarov authors a book. He sues for copyright infringement and claims damages.
In doing so, it calls into question a fundamental assumption of many traditional intellectual property (IP) frameworks as copyrightlaws only protect works created by humans and not AI. And if someone substantially edits AI-generated data and claims copyright on the edited work, they could potentially qualify for copyright protection.
[Image Sources : Shutterstock] Copyrightability In Indian Context Copyright is a legal term used to describe the rights that creators have over their literary and artistic works. In India, section 14 of the Copyright Act [2] defines copyright in terms of the exclusive rights granted to the owner of the copyright. [3]
Development of CopyrightLaw Protection of Intellectual property rights has always been in existence among various sections of the society. The first codified statute dealing with copyright protection of printed books dates back to 1710, known as British Statute of Anne.
Restricting this photocopying to 10% of the total pages of a book. Historically, the exceptions for teaching, education and research have never been qualified by the nature of ownership of the institution where the use of the work is carried out. Limitations on storage of copied works in digital formats. Concluding thoughts.
As of 2022, it is not even a new idea to use digital methods to copy heritage, considering that the mass digitisation of cultural heritage, especially books, started more than two decades ago. Alternatively, ownership of the scans is not addressed at all when discussing physical repatriation.
Through an examination of ChatGPT’s ‘Terms of Use’, our former blogger Varsha Jhavar attempts to investigate the copyright implications of the chatbot inter alia touching upon the issue of ownership and assignment of the output generated. Her previous posts on the blog can be viewed here , here , here and here.
This post only deals with copyrightability of fonts from artistic work perspective and does not explore the copyrightability of fonts as code or literary works. Debunking the ‘no copyright for fonts’ Argument. This is perhaps why fonts cannot be copyrighted in the US. Eastern Book Co.
Indeed, human creators seek compensation for the novel use of their intellectual efforts while AI firms aim to maximize the free harvesting of data (including copyright-protected materials) for training their algorithms. On 21 February 2023, the USCO reviewed the registration of the comic book “Zarya of the Dawn” (Registration No.
Although the contract between a makeup artist and her publisher described the artist as the author of the book, the dispute still arose under the Copyright Act because “author” is a term defined under the Act. A full summary of this case has been published on Kluwer IP Law. Kelley, August 12, 2020, Higginbotham, P.).
A growing number of daily releases makes India’s copyrightlaws particularly important in. In contrast to book authoring, the process of making a movie involves a lot of collaboration. A precise elucidation about the ownership of cinematographic films has been provided by Section 17 of The Copyright Act, 1957 Act.
I have often felt, however, that these issues were a bit of a misdirection, with at least part of the tech community treating the copyright community like dogs distracted by squirrels. Each of these cases is unique, fact dependent, and likely, if fully litigated on the merits, to shed light on different aspects of copyrightlaw.
Deepali is a 3rd year law student at NLSIU Bangalore. Poster of the film “ Naanum Rowdy Dhaan “ Image from here Nayanthara and Dhanush Copyright Controversy – De Minimis Rule to the Rescue? De-Minimis or de minimis non curat lex is a legal principle that discounts minor or trivial violations of law.
The Court held that in the absence of directly comparable source code in a software copyright infringement and misuse case, records of conversations, meetings, timelines, and e-mails can be used to show ownership of copyright, highlighting the importance of keeping a record of this information.
Copyright Office. Dorland to prevent publication of The Kindest at a book festival, and an onslaught of plagiarism allegations. Dorland’s copyright infringement claims were allowed, while her claim for intentional infliction of emotional distress was denied.? In order to prove copyright infringement , Ms.
We organize all of the trending information in your field so you don't have to. Join 9,000+ users and stay up to date on the latest articles your peers are reading.
You know about us, now we want to get to know you!
Let's personalize your content
Let's get even more personalized
We recognize your account from another site in our network, please click 'Send Email' below to continue with verifying your account and setting a password.
Let's personalize your content