This site uses cookies to improve your experience. To help us insure we adhere to various privacy regulations, please select your country/region of residence. If you do not select a country, we will assume you are from the United States. Select your Cookie Settings or view our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Used for the proper function of the website
Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Strictly Necessary: Used for the proper function of the website
Performance/Analytics: Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
” [The $2,500 amount was suggested by the presiding judge at a settlement conference, which the defendant turned into an offer of judgment.] However we get there, the overall litigation enterprise here makes no economic sense. KMC appeared first on Technology & Marketing Law Blog.
Reading Time: 2 minutes Imagine finding yourself in the intricate world of civil litigation, where stakes are high, stories are gripping, and outcomes have a huge impact. Understanding General Damages Through Civil Banter One of the focal points of this first episode is general damages in civil litigation.
Litigation is almost always recommended to be avoided , whether because of the sheer amount of time needed to get a court date, the expensive costs for the client and law firm, or the risks associated with receiving an unfavorable judgement. Michelle Mao is an incoming 2L JD student at Osgoode Hall Law school and an IPilogue Writer.
Lynk Media is positioning itself for many appearances on this blog. It’s a good way to boost the odds of settlements, as surviving a motion to dismiss raises the defense costs substantially. However, it appears to be a breeding ground for trollish litigation as well.
The ruling overturns a “seismic” district court ruling from 2014 that I wrote about in a previous blog post , one that “threaten[ed] to undo a 75-year-old consensus that state law does not provide a public performance right for sound recordings.” See my previous blog post on the New York ruling.) Flo & Eddie, Inc. Background.
At an initial conference on January 23, 2023, the parties reached a settlement and asked to dismiss the claim. Other cases where Oppenheimer has been a litigant show that he has some licensing history, however minimal. Prutton claims that Oppenheimer was unreasonable in settlement negotiations. It seems like it did.
Three cases have filed a “notice of settlement,” though some of the other dismissals may reflect undisclosed settlements. We believe this shows that understanding the law does not improve the perceived benefits of the CASE Act venue relative to traditional copyright infringement litigation.
Outfits that target blogs and other websites for using photos without permission, for example. Targets are encouraged to pay settlements to ensure these legal problems go away. In a recent blog post , EFF explains its concerns in detail, asking the Supreme Court to mind the trolls.
On June 26, just before the end of its term, the Supreme Court denied Genius’s cert petition, putting this litigation to rest. Second, zooming out further, the case revolves around a topic covered on this blog routinely: data scraping. Not so much on the facts of the case, but mostly on where it is being litigated.
Sometimes potential litigants dismiss their injuries as unlikely to attract high damage awards or to be worth the stress of litigation. For example, if you sustained a physical injury in a car accident on January 7, 2022, your limitation period would be no later than January 7, 2024.
As my declaration explains, I estimate that over 10,000 defendants have been ensnared in this litigation net in the past 15 months or so. GmbH as a Possible Trademark Troll appeared first on Technology & Marketing Law Blog. While the defendants’ names remain sealed, Emoji Co. then voluntarily dismisses the defendants.
GmbH as potentially a trademark troll due to their high litigation volume and dubious litigation tactics. Dear [smiley]” formed a settlement agreement. The post 2021 Emoji Law Year-in-Review appeared first on Technology & Marketing Law Blog. I wrote an expert opinion characterizing Emoji Co.
I’m pleased to share a draft of a new paper, “ A SAD New Category of Abusive Intellectual Property Litigation.” The post My New Article on Abusive “Schedule A” IP Lawsuits Will Likely Leave You Angry appeared first on Technology & Marketing Law Blog. I would welcome yours.
The one actually litigated in the case (these images come from the complaint) is here.) For more details, see the section “A Brief History of Copyright Registration” in my previous blog post.). 881 (2019), and my previous blog post. A Google search turns up three different pairs of designs with differing degrees of similarity.
You can think of a TTAB trademark opposition as a mini-litigation between the opposer and the trademark applicant. So the cost of litigation will depend upon how far both sides are willing to go to fight for their trademark rights. defendant), consider settlement options, counterclaims and any potentially dispositive motions.
1] This blog will briefly summarize a few of the notable copyright infringement cases Netflix has defended against in the United States. Then, the post will predict how Netflix may shift its content practices, defense strategies, and settlement tactics as a result of their past litigation successes in copyright actions.
This article delves into the legal doctrines that support the parties’ claims and the overarching strategy to their settlement. In the end, settlement was in the best interests of both parties. The global settlement includes a worldwide patent license to certain ViiV patents related to dolutegravir. sales of Biktarvy.
McGucken is a professional photographer who has appeared on the blog before. I’m sure ShutterStock would have written a $2,131 settlement check to avoid the litigation. ShutterStock appeared first on Technology & Marketing Law Blog. Is the attorneys’ fee shift motivating some or all of this lawsuit?
I blogged about these volume limits in a prior post , when the Copyright Office proposed allowing only 10 cases per year per plaintiff. Some of the things I worry about the most: the low filing cost and simplified procedures will invite unmeritorious claims that will prompt defendants to accept low-value settlements rather than fight.
As part of the course requirements, students were asked to write a reflective blog on their internship experience. External counsel were assigned to individual files, but in-house counsel kept abreast of developments through regular updates to their litigation reports, which provide an overview of ongoing litigation from claims to timelines.
What makes the cost of patent litigation so high? What would you think if I told you that the average patent litigation cost exceeds well over $1 million ? Actually, several factors contribute to the overall cost of patent infringement litigation. What factors make patent litigation so costly?
As a super-notice, it can produce cash payouts from settlements or default judgments (which are enforced against the cash held at the online marketplace, so they have actual value). If there are 1,000 SAD Scheme cases a year with 200 defendants each, there are 200,000 SAD Scheme trademark defendants in litigation every year.
As the patent collections of large corporations grow and products begin to materialize, one should expect an increase in patent litigation surrounding virtual reality soon. In the face of increased patent litigation, IP lawyers and lawmakers interacting with the AR/VR patent landscape should consider 2 potential problems.
How much does patent litigation cost? According to statistics and economic surveys , the median patent litigation cost is roughly $1.5 How can smaller businesses reduce patent litigation costs to make them within reach? Need more affordable costs for patent litigation? What are affordable ways to litigate patents?
Whether or not AI works infringe the copyrights on the original works is an issue that is currently being litigated in a pair of lawsuits against Stability AI , the startup that created Stable Diffusion (an AI tool with the impressive ability to turn text into images in what some have dubbed the most massive art heist in history ).
The court also upholds the attorneys’ fee award with more critical remarks about Bell’s litigation: He has a long history of suing public institutions and nonprofit organizations over de minimis uses of his work. This is yet another case where a serial litigant loses a fair use ruling on a motion to dismiss. Implications.
This case could have led to several outcomes including, but not limited to, the pub running out of financial resources midway through litigation or the pub feeling pressured into a settlement. Condé Nast clearly has many more resources to help them fight such a battle.
Teva can never rely on a patent expiry date as another generic may be in litigation to invalidate that patent tomorrow, in which case Teva would be too behind to launch their own version of the medicine if they weren’t paying attention to the litigation within the industry. I participated in a settlement negotiation.
In patent litigation, both infringement and invalidity issues may be argued. The post Utility Patent Infringement: The Most Important Things to Know appeared first on Patent Trademark Blog | IP Q&A. No costs or attorney’s fees are recoverable in USPTO patent reexaminations.
I’m pleased to share the final published version of my article, “ A SAD Scheme of Abusive Intellectual Property Litigation.” Prior Blog Posts on the SAD Scheme In a SAD Scheme Case, Court Rejects Injunction Over “Emoji” Trademark Schedule A (SAD Scheme) Plaintiff Sanctioned for “Fraud on the Court”–Xped v.
However, sometimes the likely damages award from a successful federal copyright lawsuit will be less than the attorneys’ fees and other costs to litigate it. To get around this, the CCB proceedings are nominally “voluntary” to the litigants. Currently, all federal copyright infringement claims must be filed in federal court.
Last week, the Federal Trade Commission’s (FTC) tech blog quietly published a post that could have broad implications – for privacy practitioners and beyond. And keep in mind, unlike agency policy statements, a blog post like this is not voted on or even reviewed by the commissioners (except, perhaps, the chair’s office).
Applying the court’s inherent authority to punish bad faith litigation, the court concludes: “Roblox multiplied the proceedings of this case in bad faith.” The court implies that Roblox should have just accepted a low-value settlement and moved on, but Roblox has the right to adjudicate its case. Bigfinz , 2023 U.S.
This blog post tracks the Goorin Bros. Judge Seeger starts by reinforcing the importance of judicial transparency: “A party who wants to depart from that longstanding tradition, and litigate in secret, must carry a heavy burden.” In very similar opinions, Judge Seeger explained why defendant sealing is inappropriate.
1-800 Contacts. * FTC Explains Why It Thinks 1-800 Contacts’ Keyword Ad Settlements Were Anti-Competitive–FTC v. Amazon. * More Evidence Why Keyword Advertising Litigation Is Waning. * Court Dumps Crappy Trademark & Keyword Ad Case–ONEPul v. lululemon appeared first on Technology & Marketing Law Blog.
After reading one of our articles on the topic, attorney Paul Levy at the Public Citizen Litigation Group concluded that it was. McFree rejected Watch Tower’s proposed settlement and his defense went on the offensive. The stipulation of dismissal can be found here (pdf) and Paul Levy’s excellent blog here.
The Schedule A litigation phenomenon continues apace in the Northern District of Illinois, a court that has become, in the words of Judge Seeger, “ an assembly line for TROs.” But Schedule A litigation is not confined to Chicago. The plaintiff gets a TRO with an asset freeze, then starts making settlement demands.
2] More specifically, AI can be deployed to help the growing number of self-represented litigants navigate the justice system, and also assist low-income households explore avenues of recourse they may not have pursued without this type of technological assistance. [3].
NY Times : Meta Agrees to Alter Ad Technology in Settlement With U.S. In re Meta Pixel Healthcare Litigation, 2022 WL 17869218 (N.D. The settlement agreement. Prior blog post. * The post 2H 2022 Quick Links, Part 1 (Marketing, Privacy) appeared first on Technology & Marketing Law Blog. Marketing. *
This choice, while met positively by many film aficionados – especially those not yet ready to attend live events – has sparked litigation from many sides. Between Johansson’s settlement and this ongoing litigation, it’s clear that this issue is not yet resolved, and entertainment’s adaptations to a post-2020 world remain to be finalized.
Concluding the war between Xiaomi and InterDigital, the two companies have reached settlements. These settlements come after InterDigital brought claims to courts in Delhi, India and Munich, Germany. Both courts agreed that Xiaomi’s anti-suit injunction was inconsistent with the law and overturned the Wuhan ruling.
Our last blog post on the Bell v. The court also stated "that Bell is a serial litigant, who makes exorbitant demands for damages in hopes of extracting disproportionate settlements[,]" and therefore "[a]ttorney's fees were thus an appropriate deterrent." Winning isn't normal.
In our June 6, 2021, blog post we reported on a lawsuit between two companies that guide prospective college students in their application process. Now that the Complaint and Answer have been filed, both parties will proceed forward into litigation. Plaintiff Ivy Coach, Inc. (“Ivy”)
A photo of the Indianapolis nighttime skyline has generated $825 in license fees & $135k in settlements. After 3+ yrs of litigation, court awards Bell $200 in statutory damages–but actually $0 due to a related settlement. This is a preview of the future of CCB litigation…CAN’T WAIT!
We organize all of the trending information in your field so you don't have to. Join 9,000+ users and stay up to date on the latest articles your peers are reading.
You know about us, now we want to get to know you!
Let's personalize your content
Let's get even more personalized
We recognize your account from another site in our network, please click 'Send Email' below to continue with verifying your account and setting a password.
Let's personalize your content