Blogging Copying Ownership 
The IPKat
DECEMBER 12, 2021
Another week, another review of the latest news from the surrounding IP blogs! Paul Keller reports on the Kluwer Copyright Blog. Gianluca Campus discusses the balance between cloud services and private copying levy in his analysis of the AG Hogan’s Opinion in the Austro-Mechana case (C-433-20), published for the Kluwer Copyright Blog.
IPilogue
NOVEMBER 17, 2021
These events point to two prevalent issues within the current legal framework: First, that current intellectual property laws do not properly acknowledge collective ownership over shared culture within Indigenous communities and second, whether tattoo designs have the potential to be protected through copyright laws. Of note, in DRG Inc.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
SpicyIP
JANUARY 31, 2025
The Centre for Intellectual Property Research and Advocacy [CIPRA] of Symbiosis Law School, Hyderabad is organizing its first blog writing competition in collaboration with us on the theme of Literature, Journalism and IP. The top two entries will be awarded with some cash prizes and also with a chance to be published on the blog!
Technology & Marketing Law Blog
JUNE 17, 2023
According to the complaint, these separate entities are just one big data-sharing family, leveraging their combined resources in non-standard ways such as Microsoft sharing hardware and cloud infrastructure resources in exchange for an ownership interest in OpenAI. Complaint at 31. 22-cv-7074-JST, ECF No. And this case is just beginning.
The IPKat
JANUARY 23, 2022
Although a bleak winter week, the IPKat is here to warm you up with tales of interesting posts from the IP blogs. The summary was published via the Kluwer Copyright Blog. The figures provide interesting data and the Kluwer Copyright Blog provides its commentary. Is overblocking real? Crabtree v. Crabtree v.
Technology & Marketing Law Blog
MAY 30, 2022
While common law trademark rights can and often do support federal infringement claims, an infringement plaintiff must show ownership of a valid mark as a threshold requirement for the cause of action. It confirms both ownership of valid copyrights and copying by the defendants of original constituent elements of the works.
Intepat
FEBRUARY 19, 2025
This doctrine is mainly pertinent to the physical copies of copyrighted works, such as books, CDs, and DVDs. Digital content can easily be copied which raises the question of whether this doctrine ought to apply to digital works as well. However, the applicability of this doctrine in the digital era is still a matter of contention.
Expert insights. Personalized for you.
117 
Let's personalize your content