This site uses cookies to improve your experience. To help us insure we adhere to various privacy regulations, please select your country/region of residence. If you do not select a country, we will assume you are from the United States. Select your Cookie Settings or view our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Used for the proper function of the website
Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Strictly Necessary: Used for the proper function of the website
Performance/Analytics: Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
It’s “burn-down-the-Internet” week on the blog, during which I am recapping three bad California bills that the California legislature is poised to enact. Monday, I covered AB 2273, the Age-Appropriate Design Code. For background on the bill and its voluminous problems, see this lengthy blog post.
Socialmedia (aka Facebook) were not a part of the conversation. This raises the question: does the press publishers’ right apply to socialmedia? While socialmedia were not explicitly singled out, they seem to comfortably fall within the ISSP definition. Do socialmedia make content available?
This is a case focusing on ownership of socialmedia accounts. The dispute is between bridalwear designer Hayley Paige Gutman and JLM Couture, a bridalwear company. We blogged this case twice before. The court discusses two socialmedia accounts: Instagram.com/misshayleypaige and pinterest.com/misshayleypaige/_saved/.
[Warning: this is a 5,600 word blog post]. There are two critically important cases over “socialmedia addiction” pending in California state court and as an MDL in the federal Northern District of California. Despite the importance of those Fall 2023 rulings, I never blogged either.
The court’s ruling raises interesting, but troubling, questions about any government actor’s ability to enable reader comments on socialmedia. but the State Police cannot “block Tanner from participating in its designated public forum based on his profane private messages.” The Manually Deleted Comment.
This is the latest entry in a long-running legal battle between Hayley Paige Gutman, a bridalwear designer, and JLM Couture, her one-time employer. What does a 200+ year old fox have to say about who owns socialmedia accounts?). On appeal, the Second Circuit vacates the account transfers to JLM. ” (Cite to Pierson v.
The categorization of socialmedia accounts into “business” and “personal” accounts was a hot issue a decade ago, when states across the country passed laws to protect employees from invasive employer demands to access or control their personal socialmedia accounts. See Musk, Elon).
[I blogged the Supreme Court oral arguments in the NetChoice cases yesterday. That decision could have significant implications for this case as well as all other First Amendment challenges of states’ efforts to censor socialmedia.] I previously blogged the TRO. To enable greater government censorship of speech? (I
My blog post analyzing the law. For example, from the intro: “Texas has designated the Platforms common carriers; they no longer have a right to discriminate against different views in their role as public conduits.” I can’t blog them all. My blog post. ” That’s a word salad to me.
The opinion holds that the key parts of Florida’s socialmedia censorship law (SB 7072) likely violate the First Amendment and should remain enjoined. ” The opinion also highlights the madness of the Fifth Circuit allowing the Texas socialmedia censorship law to take effect via a 1-line order. “S.B.
The Act’s prohibitions focus solely on the conduct of the covered website—the website’s use of certain design features on minors’ accounts—and impose liability irrespective of the content those design features may be used to disseminate. Reyes appeared first on Technology & Marketing Law Blog. Reyes , 2024 WL 3510919 (D.
Earlier this year, the Texas legislature enacted HB 20 , a blatant attempt to censor socialmedia service. The opinion emphatically slices through the FUD that’s been generated by pro-censorial forces questioning whether socialmedia services exercise editorial discretion. The Opinion. ” [cite to USTA v.
We say goodbye to 2021 with the most interesting posts and articles from the surrounding IP blogs of the past week! The analysis also referred to a pending case before the CJEU dealing with Community design law ( EUIPO v The KaiKai Company Jaeger Wichmann | C-382/21-P) and other EU trade mark cases from 2021. Daktronics, Inc.,
Organic marketing from their customers through socialmedia has been a cost-saving exercise. In addition to trade marks, you can also protect the visual appearance of your product, or packaging, with a registered design. If you enjoyed todays episode, why not subscribe to our Dragons Den IPO blog?
A victim’s daughter sued Facebook, alleging that Facebook’s “design and architecture” radicalized Roof, and that should disqualify Facebook for Section 230. As usual, the filing of the complaint got significant news coverage, but those same media outlets are apparently uninterested in the denouement.
“Courts within the Second Circuit have routinely found that socialmedia websites and online matching services are interactive computer services.” Try as he might to make his claims about the way Instagram is designed, his claims are inherently grounded in third-party content posted to the app. Facebook , Herrick v.
“Influencer Marketing” and “SocialMedia Brand Endorsement” have become big business. Our law firm represents some of the business’s largest socialmedia marketing agencies and influencers. This means they also own and need to license the copyright to the brand. This happens all the time.
This blog explores the threat of counterfeit hauls and livestreams, as first detailed in our Brand Protection: The SocialMedia Threat eBook. Digital influence: The role of socialmedia and influencers in promoting dupes has normalized counterfeits, positioning them as stylish and savvy rather than deceptive.
This blog explores how brands, including Tommy Hilfiger , are adapting to Gen Zs online behaviors, educating them about the real-world consequences of counterfeiting, and evolving their strategies to stay relevant in an ever-changing digital landscape. For example, in France, Facebook is still popular with Gen Z.
TPG aggregates and collects information from the most prominent rewards programs and provides a series of rankings and recommendations designed to help maximize your rewards points. Power Ventures involved a socialmedia aggregator’s consensual use of its users’ Facebook passwords to access their Facebook accounts. Facebook v.
Plaintiffs alleged that Facebook and LinkedIn agreed to divvy up the socialmedia market “between 2013 and 2016.” — The thing that binds these two cases together is that both seem designed to build off the 9th Circuit’s reasoning in the hiQ Labs, Inc. All these claims were dismissed without prejudice, with leave to amend.
Doe’s negligent design claim similarly aims to hold Snap liable for communications exchanged between Doe and Guess-Mazock. I know there are many people who support that outcome; indeed, that’s the inevitable effect of California’s proposed Age-Appropriate Design Code. This claim is also barred by Section 230.
The victims sued socialmedia companies for allegedly radicalizing the shooter by exposing him to third-party content. As usual nowadays, the plaintiffs relied heavily on product design theories to overcome the obvious Section 230 defense. Case Citation : Jones v.
VIP Products sells a toy that imitates the trademarks of Jack Daniel’s Properties using a design similar to the company’s whisky label and bottle shape, but with the name “Bad Spaniels”, a spaniel’s face, and poop jokes. Jack Daniel’s contends this design infringes its trademarks and tarnishes its brand. –Jack Daniel’s v.
Unauthorized pages and posts on socialmedia can dilute a brand’s goodwill and reputation and confuse consumers. One of the most important strategies to tackle these issues is filing takedown requests with socialmedia and e-commerce platforms. And the worst part?
The California Age-Appropriate Design Code (AADC / AB2273, just signed by Gov. For example, it’s been repeatedly shown that some socialmedia features provide net benefit to a majority or plurality of users, but other subcommunities of minors don’t benefit from those features. Newsom ) is an example of such a bill.
For example, the most aggressive companies in pursuing web-scraping litigation are the socialmedia companies. And while their terms of use provide the socialmedia companies a license to use that user-generated content, it is their users who typically have a copyright interest in their content.
At the same time, it opened the door to potential liability for all tools that help content creators make their content, basically suggesting that the tools would be negligently designed in ways that expose the tool authors to liability for personal injuries. The Lemmon court disagrees with the lower court in Maynard v.
It’s “burn-down-the-Internet” week on the blog, during which I will recap three bad California bills that the California legislature is poised to enact. Yesterday, I covered AB 2273, the Age-Appropriate Design Code. For background on the bill and its voluminous problems, see this lengthy blog post. The bill is unduly burdensome.
To safeguard your trademarks adequately, you should track new trademark filings, online use, socialmedia usage of marks, and domain names, which shall alert you to potential conflicts. The same includes e-commerce marketplaces, standalone business websites, and socialmedia channels. Bottom Line. For more visit: [link].
In a November ruling, a magistrate judge notes that the lawsuit appears to be the first of its kindone in which a socialmedia influencer accuses another influencer of (among other things) copyright infringement based on the similarities between their posts that promote the same products. Sydney Nicole LLC v. Sydney Nicole LLC v.
Following this designation , objects require authorization and a licence fee to be used commercially by third parties regardless of whether the work is in the public domain. Uffizi’s Director Eike Schmidt commented that “fashion designers regularly use our images” such as Leonardo da Vinci, Caravaggio, Titian, Raphael and Giotto di Bondone.
In 2016, the Federal Patent Court rejected a requested trademark registration of the term “EMOJIS” for chocolate because this expression was already an established designation for figurative symbols in electronic communication (in the German language, the plural of emoji is “Emojis”). Emoji as marginal notes. Emoji as dispositive.
These products are essentially replicas of luxury or designer fragrances, crafted to mimic the scent profile of high-end perfumes at a fraction of the cost. Counterfeit perfumes are unauthorized imitations that not only replicate the scent of a branded perfume but also copy its packaging, bottle design, and branding.
Trademark and registered design portfolio It goes without saying: maintaining a comprehensive trademark portfolio is key. In particular, if a product goes viral on any socialmedia platform, it is very likely that counterfeiters will target it. For more information, contact Rebecca Dücker , Jens Petry or Paolo Beconcini.
Today I’m blogging about one of those bills, California AB 2408 , “Socialmedia platform: child users: addiction.” This bill assumes that socialmedia platforms are intentionally addicting kids, so it creates business-ending liability to thwart those alleged addictions. What the Bill Says.
Power Ventures was a platform that attempted to enable users to manage all their socialmedia accounts from one platform. That’s not what the statute is designed to prevent. Booking (Guest Blog Post) appeared first on Technology & Marketing Law Blog. –RyanAir v.
As part of the course requirements, students were asked to write a blog on a topic of their choice. The use of interactive face filters on socialmedia platforms complements this integration of face detecting technology into our daily lives. The sound of your alarm marks the start to your day. to their face.
Defendants also managed the socialmedia presence of the “La Baguette” business, which primarily consisted of a Facebook page. Moore, Find Out Who Your Friends Are: A Framework for Determining Whether Employees’ SocialMedia Followers Follow Them to A New Job, 39 CAMPBELL L. See generally, Christopher A.
Within the last two weeks, Virginia amended its existing NIL laws to significantly strengthen student-athlete NIL rights, and the NCAA adopted new NIL rules designed to allow schools to support student-athlete NIL endeavors. By: Pillsbury - Internet & SocialMedia Law Blog
On October 25, 2022, following a string of antisemitic remarks and hate speech from Ye (formerly known as Kanye West) on socialmedia, Adidas announced their decision to terminate their co-branding partnership with Ye and end production of all Yeezy branded products.
Its AI is designed to detect and prevent crimes. Clearview’s AI crawls the internet and can access, download, and store any image uploaded to socialmedia. Many socialmedia companies, including Google, Facebook, and Twitter, have accused Clearview of utilizing user images without authorization.
For businesses like Manta Hair, securing design rights or patents can offer a quicker path to protection, ensuring the uniqueness of their product is safeguarded in the market. If you've mentioned it in a speech, uploaded a photo to socialmedia or displayed a prototype at a trade show, this could potentially stop your patent being granted.
Other Posts SpicyIP Tidbit: Delhi Police Authorized to Issue Takedown Orders for Unlawful Content On 26th December 2024, the Delhi Government issued a gazette notification, designating Delhi Police as the nodal agency for regulating digital content hosted or published on intermediary platforms in the National Capital Territory of Delhi.
We organize all of the trending information in your field so you don't have to. Join 9,000+ users and stay up to date on the latest articles your peers are reading.
You know about us, now we want to get to know you!
Let's personalize your content
Let's get even more personalized
We recognize your account from another site in our network, please click 'Send Email' below to continue with verifying your account and setting a password.
Let's personalize your content