Technology & Marketing Law Blog

MAY 30, 2022

Finally, it points out Viacom is the owner of three valid trademark registrations for the KRUSTY KRAB mark and 400 copyright registrations covering “creative aspects of the SpongeBob SquarePants franchise,” including episodes from the animated television series, movies, drawings, and stylebooks featuring artwork from the franchise.

Blogging 111

Blogging Social Media Television Fair Use 111

Kluwer Copyright Blog

FEBRUARY 2, 2023

AI-generated works have won awards: The Crow , an “AI-made” film won the Jury Award at the Cannes Short Film Festival and the story of an AI artwork winning the Colorado State Fair’s annual art competition was reported in The New York Times. AI-generated art was used for magazine covers, including Cosmopolitan and The Economist.

Copyright 145

Copyright Art Registration Fair Use 145

CopyrightsWorld

JUNE 10, 2021

Do you want to get hired by a fashion magazine? If you have a following on social media, there are some relatively easy ways to make the most of your reach (e.g., Despite some downsides, a portfolio website offers benefits no other media does. It’s from the same set of artwork for event promotion.

Design 98

Design Designs Art Business 98

LexBlog IP

APRIL 25, 2022

” [5] The Report only discussed money laundering, ignoring other known risk areas in the art market, such as the sale of forged or stolen artworks. [6]. ” [7] In 2020, Treasury defined high-value art as artwork having an estimated market value of over $100,000. [8] Million , Smithsonian Magazine: Smart News (Apr.

Art 52

Art Marketing Marketing Due Diligence 52

Copyright Lately

MAY 22, 2023

Meanwhile, by the time the case reached the Court, photographer Lynn Goldsmith had limited her challenge to AWF’s act of licensing Warhol’s work to Condé Nast for use in a magazine commemorating Prince’s death. Drop me a note in the comments below or @copyrightlately on social media.

Fair Use 102

Fair Use Licensing Copying Artwork 102

LexBlog IP

JULY 7, 2023

8] Second, as to the works’ purpose, the court found that it was unclear whether Prince intended to create a parody of the original photographs, a satire of society’s use of social media, or neither, pointing out Prince’s own contradictory testimony on the question. [9]

Fair Use 52

Fair Use Art Licensing Copyright Infringement 52