article thumbnail

How A Century-Old Insight of Photography Can Inform Legal Questions of AI-Generated Artwork (Guest Blog Post)

Technology & Marketing Law Blog

Copyright Office denied copyright protection for Kashtanova’s Midjourney-generated artwork, the Office found their work lacked the critical component of a human author. The law of the copyrightability of AI-generated artwork is likely to continue to change, but the battle between new technology and old law will timelessly endure.

Artwork 98
article thumbnail

3 Count: NFT Repeat

Plagiarism Today

According to Fitzpatrick, he’s been informed by YouTube that the claims were manual ones against his account and, as such, there is no recourse available to him. 3: PokerPaint Boss Brett Butz in New Copyright Theft Row over Artwork NFTs. 2: Operation ‘IPTV Special’: 49 Pirate IPTV Resellers Fined €10,000 Each.

Insiders

Sign Up for our Newsletter

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

Trending Sources

article thumbnail

[Guest post] ‘Ghiblification’ and the Moral Wrongs of U.S. Copyright Law

The IPKat

And even if the artwork of Miyazaki was a visual work that could fall under the realm of VARA protections, moral rights in their current form would probably inadequately protect against the new frontiers of AI outputs. Thanks to extensive lobbying from studios, motion pictures were explicitly exempted from moral rights protections.

article thumbnail

Pricing Artwork with Borbay’s Contemporary Art Pricing Chart

Art Law Journal

Striking the right chord when pricing artwork is tricky to maneuver, especially because overpricing your work versus undervaluing yourself as an artist seems like it’s a very fine line. What’s more, there’s not a dearth of useful information on the topic. Establishing Your Market for Pricing Artwork. Borbay.com.

Artwork 52
article thumbnail

[Guest Post] Things go belly-up for Aldi in Australia as baby food packaging found to constitute copyright infringement

The IPKat

Aldi was sued for copyright infringement of an artwork that appeared on the packaging of childrens snacks under the BABY BELLIES, LITTLE BELLIES and MIGHTY BELLIES brands, each aimed at different age groups. The brands (hereafter Bellies) were licensed to Every Bite Counts Pty Ltd ("EBC"), including a range of Puffs products. Puffs Works."

article thumbnail

Ankit Sahni’s AI “Co-authored” Artwork Denied Registration by US, Continues to be Registered in India

SpicyIP

Image from the order Ankit Sahni’s AI “Co-authored” Artwork Denied Registration by US, Continues to be Registered in India By Vedika Chawla The Review Board of the US Copyright Office (USCO) reaffirmed the decision to deny copyright registration to Ankit Sahni’s artwork titled ‘Suryast,’ which was created by the use of AI technology.

Artwork 58
article thumbnail

Atari’s Copyright Claim Against State Farm Survives Challenge

Copyright Lately

I first wrote about this case back in March , when Atari filed a complaint accusing State Farm and its advertising partners of improperly appropriating artwork from Atari’s 1983 arcade game “Crystal Castles” for a 6-second online video advertisement. Conversely, in Ringgold v.

Fair Use 109