This site uses cookies to improve your experience. To help us insure we adhere to various privacy regulations, please select your country/region of residence. If you do not select a country, we will assume you are from the United States. Select your Cookie Settings or view our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Used for the proper function of the website
Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Strictly Necessary: Used for the proper function of the website
Performance/Analytics: Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
Image via Staatliche Museen, Berlin, Gemäldegalerie / Christoph Schmidt PublicDomain Mark 1.0 In this context of international and EU legal obligations to protect cultural rights, the EU has set a legal imperative to protect the publicdomain.
We have an artwork, displayed in a museum and which is in the publicdomain. Thus, not only it is for the authority taking care of the artwork (e.g. On the other hand, given that these artworks have already fallen in the publicdomain, in such a scenario there is no room for copyright to apply.
AI-generated art represents a fusion of human ingenuity in crafting algorithms and the machine’s ability to produce artworks autonomously. To navigate this complex issue, it is essential to explore the current legal frameworks governing AI-generated art. Copyright laws are designed to safeguard the rights of creators.
One aspect regarding the laws that govern copyright is that in the United States alone the copyright is only given by law to works that are created by human beings. This position was reiterated through several decisions, the most significant ruling for an export artwork was by the U.S. Copyright Office.
Copyright that is transferred upon selling an NFT may explicitly be outlined in the self-executing smart contract governing the sale. For instance, CrypToadz is a prominent CC0 NFT project wherein the artwork related to the NFT is in the publicdomain.
NFTs are governed by smart contracts, which divide ownership and limit transferability. As a result, the Indian Copyright Act, 1957 grants the owner of the artwork or the licensee sole rights to discharge copyrights that have already accrued under the statute. iii] NFTs are limited to having a single owner.
NFTs may be represented in the form of memes, artworks, or videos. The copyrights that subsist on an NFT are also governed with the help of a smart contract. Several individuals have been held for falsifying copyright ownership over a work that exists in the publicdomain.
has filed a figurative application for an image of the Empire State Building (see below) covering, among other things “ non-fungible tokens (NFTs) ” and “ downloadable multimedia files containing artwork authenticated by non-fungible tokens (NFTs) ” in Class 9 (see here ). Pictures in the lower middle are in the publicdomain.
The introduction and advancement of generative AI technology, which is capable of producing everything from research articles to realistic artworks, has brought a revolution in the field of creativity. AI will play a rapidly expanding role in all aspects of our daily life and therefore the law must govern its applications.
Many aspiring artists have now started converting their physical and digital artworks into NFTs and putting it up for sale, with many making considerable profits. NFTs have sparked several discussions raising questions on how this would affect IP Rights and what ownership of artwork, especially digital copies of artwork entails.
Context Copyright can be challenging for cultural institutions (or “GLAM“ for Galleries, Libraries, Archives and Museums) when pursuing digitization and dissemination activities, as copyright governs whether a given work can be used and if so, how (as shown in recent studies for museums , archives or libraries ). Proposal 4.
Recent advances in the technical field of quantum technologies have not only experienced high amount of attention in information science and software engineering disciplines but also gained a wide interest of government due to its complexity and global significance. billion by 2027. billion by 2027. Image Source: IStock].
Authentication techniques and the legal frameworks governing the global art market play a vital role in combating this prominent problem of art forgery. Intellectual property rights are crucial for protecting artists rights in their artwork. Copyrights safeguard creative work from unauthorised reproduction, replication and sale.
The USPTO has invoked Section 2(c) to refuse registration of phrases like “ Obama Pajama ” for pajamas, and not just marks that contain criticism of government officials or public figures. After the Supreme Court granted cert in Vidal v. The problem with Elster’s argument, however, is that Section 2(c) does not prohibit any expression.
We organize all of the trending information in your field so you don't have to. Join 9,000+ users and stay up to date on the latest articles your peers are reading.
You know about us, now we want to get to know you!
Let's personalize your content
Let's get even more personalized
We recognize your account from another site in our network, please click 'Send Email' below to continue with verifying your account and setting a password.
Let's personalize your content