Intepat

SEPTEMBER 15, 2023

AI-generated art represents a fusion of human ingenuity in crafting algorithms and the machine’s ability to produce artworks autonomously. Copyright laws are designed to safeguard the rights of creators. To navigate this complex issue, it is essential to explore the current legal frameworks governing AI-generated art.

Art 105

Art Copyright Ownership Non-Fungible Tokens 105

IIPRD

NOVEMBER 23, 2022

Recent advances in the technical field of quantum technologies have not only experienced high amount of attention in information science and software engineering disciplines but also gained a wide interest of government due to its complexity and global significance. billion by 2027. billion by 2027. Image Source: IStock].

Intellectual Property 52

Intellectual Property Technology Intellectual Property Law Public Domain 52

IP and Legal Filings

MAY 13, 2024

The introduction and advancement of generative AI technology, which is capable of producing everything from research articles to realistic artworks, has brought a revolution in the field of creativity. A linguistic model lacks the kind of human imagination required to develop logos or designs.

Copyright 89

Copyright Intellectual Property Ownership Technology 89

The IPKat

MAY 3, 2022

has filed a figurative application for an image of the Empire State Building (see below) covering, among other things “ non-fungible tokens (NFTs) ” and “ downloadable multimedia files containing artwork authenticated by non-fungible tokens (NFTs) ” in Class 9 (see here ). Pictures in the lower middle are in the public domain.

Non-Fungible Tokens 100

Non-Fungible Tokens Branding Brands Branding 100

43(B)log

JUNE 24, 2022

Other IP rights: utility patent creates presumption of functionality; wonders about whether presence of non-TM IP protection for ornamental features—design patent, ©--might create a presumption of mere ornamentality w/o further evidence of source signification. artworks as TMs. Banksy failed to register a bunch of his?

Trademark Law 75

Trademark Law Law Trademark Registration 75

Technology & Marketing Law Blog

NOVEMBER 27, 2023

The USPTO has invoked Section 2(c) to refuse registration of phrases like “ Obama Pajama ” for pajamas, and not just marks that contain criticism of government officials or public figures. After the Supreme Court granted cert in Vidal v. The problem with Elster’s argument, however, is that Section 2(c) does not prohibit any expression.

Registration 75

Registration Trademark Blogging Law 75