Remove Artwork Remove Copyright Law Remove Definition
article thumbnail

[Guest post] ‘Ghiblification’ and the Moral Wrongs of U.S. Copyright Law

The IPKat

Copyright Law by Angela Chung Do everything by hand, even when using the computer. And even if the artwork of Miyazaki was a visual work that could fall under the realm of VARA protections, moral rights in their current form would probably inadequately protect against the new frontiers of AI outputs.

article thumbnail

Why do artists infringe copyright – the tension between artistic creativity and copyright law

IPilogue

There seems to have always been tension between artistic creativity and copyright law. Copyright, in the simplest terms, is “ the right to copy.” The act of copying belongs to the long tradition of modernist art that questions the nature and definition of art itself.

Insiders

Sign Up for our Newsletter

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

article thumbnail

AI Cannot be the Author: U.S. Copyright Law Requires the Human Touch

JD Supra Law

Perlmutter, 22-cv-01564-BAH, definitively ruled that AI cannot be an author of a copyright under the U.S. Copyright Act, because “United States copyright law protects only works of human creation.” Copyright Office’s repeated refusal to register artwork generated by his AI machine.

article thumbnail

Disney+ ‘Behind the Attraction’ Accused of Plagiarism

Plagiarism Today

Left is my original artwork from my video. Graphic design is credited to award-winning graphic designer Jeremy Samples, so it's disappointing they would copy instead of producing original artwork. This has made Disney something of a copyright villain to many online and off. And this one.

article thumbnail

Digital art protectable under copyright? Yes, says the Italian Supreme Court

The IPKat

The Supreme Court recalled the conditions of protectability of an artwork in a case involving a work created using software. Here below the artwork by Lindelokse. The Court of Genoa held that the architect was the author of the work and that RAI had infringed her copyright. Creativity under Article 1 of Law No.

Art 99
article thumbnail

[Part II] Cryogas Judgment: Supreme Court Stops Copyright from ‘Gaslighting’ Design

SpicyIP

The court (Justice Gautam Patel) reasoned that Section 15(2) only talks about designs, not artistic works and the Designs Act explicitly excludes artistic works from the definition of design. In that scenario, Section 15(2) wouldnt kick in because it only strips copyright from works that qualify as designs.

Designs 59
article thumbnail

Who Owns the Copyright in AI-Generated Art?

Intepat

AI-generated art represents a fusion of human ingenuity in crafting algorithms and the machine’s ability to produce artworks autonomously. To delve deeper into the question of ownership, we need to grasp the traditional concept of copyright. Copyright laws are designed to safeguard the rights of creators.

Art 105