Artwork Copyright Infringement Copyright Law 
Copyright Lately
OCTOBER 24, 2022
.” I was barely out of law school when a senior partner muttered those words as he handed me a scathing demand letter sent to one of the firm’s commercial director clients. This was the late ’90s, and the entertainment industry was still reeling from a well-publicized copyright infringement lawsuit involving the movie 12 Monkeys.
Plagiarism Today
APRIL 27, 2022
1: Top EU Court Rejects Polish Complaint Over Copyright Law. First off today, John Silk at Deutsche Welle reports that the highest court in the European Union, the European Court of Justice (ECJ), has rejected a Polish challenge to the latest EU copyright directive. Have any suggestions for the 3 Count?
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Kluwer Copyright Blog
JUNE 30, 2021
Chapman (‘plaintiffs’) collectively filed a copyright infringement lawsuit against Netflix, Amazon, and Apple (‘defendants’), claiming that the defendants had directly and indirectly infringed their copyright over the song “ Fish Sticks n’ Tater Tots ” by using it in their documentary titled ‘Burlesque’ ( Brown v.
The IP Law Blog
MARCH 3, 2022
Unicolors is the owner of copyrights in various fabric designs, including a 2011 copyright registration that consisted of 31 separate designs. The jury found in Unicolors favor and H&M moved the court for judgment as a matter of law, which the trial court denied. First, the Court looked to the text of 17 U.S.C.
TorrentFreak
JUNE 22, 2022
Movie studio Miramax, which owns most of the rights to the film, sees the plan as a contract breach and copyright infringement. “Miramax’s copyright claim fails because it misapprehends fundamental principles of copyright law and ignores the clear language of the agreements and assignments,” Tarantino’s lawyers write.
Olartemoure Blog
FEBRUARY 2, 2024
This decision provides legal certainty to the audiovisual industry in copyright infringement disputes in Colombia and the Andean Community. La entrada Incidental use of artworks se publicó primero en OlarteMoure | Intellectual Property.
SpicyIP
OCTOBER 9, 2022
Such works qualify as ‘computer generated works’ under the Indian Copyright Act. For such works, copyright law confers authorship to the “person who causes the work to be created”. As reported, in 2020, the copyright office rejected an application which listed AI (RAGHAV) as the sole author for an artwork.
Expert insights. Personalized for you.
86 
Let's personalize your content