Remove Artwork Remove Contracts Remove Reference
article thumbnail

Gulls Hockey Team Gets Wings Clipped In IP Dispute With Hockey League

The IP Law Blog

There is no reference to assets or material protected by copyright. After the 2015 transaction between the team and the league closed, the team was sued by a third party who claimed that the Gull logo infringed his artwork entitled “San Diego Gulls”. What’s missing here? That will prove to be an issue for the team.

article thumbnail

NFTs: promisingly transformational, yet fraught with IP pitfalls – Part II

Kluwer Copyright Blog

The First Sale Doctrine in the Metaverse The first sale doctrine, also referred to as the ‘ principle of exhaustion’ , is a longstanding tenet of copyright (and more in general intellectual property) law. Resale Rights Another notable difficulty when it comes to tokenising artworks is brought on by the resale right regime.

Artwork 98
Insiders

Sign Up for our Newsletter

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

article thumbnail

[Guest post] 'Can't Be Evil' NFT license - A tentative NFT worldwide license standard

The IPKat

The NFT art market, that is NFTs which specifically link an artwork or a digital file (a song, for example), have already gone mainstream and, of course, artists and projects owners have asked lawyers to prepare IP licenses to protect their IP. Let alone was it clear how to protect the IP rights in the artwork linked to it.

article thumbnail

[Guest post] Free Holdings case raises important issues regarding the legal nature of NFTs

The IPKat

The entire history of the name can be seen here ) On May 28, 2021, McCoy minted another NFT to record the Quantum artwork, this time on the Ethereum blockchain. The legal nature of an NFT In each NFT there is a non-fungible token created by the smart contract and an image (e.g., a jpeg) stored on the cloud. are applicable to it.

article thumbnail

US Copyright Office refuses to register AI-generated work, finding that "human authorship is a prerequisite to copyright protection"

The IPKat

As early as in Sarony (a seminal case concerning copyright protection of photographs), the US Supreme Court referred to authors as human. First, held the Board, a machine cannot enter into any binding legal contract. The phrase ‘original works of authorship’ under §102(a) of the Act sets limits to what can be protected by copyright.

Copyright 145
article thumbnail

NFTs: promisingly transformational, yet fraught with IP pitfalls – Part I

Kluwer Copyright Blog

Nevertheless , tokens may be used in a digital rights management scheme, as the aforementioned default position is subject to contract modification, as explained below. Copyright that is transferred upon selling an NFT may explicitly be outlined in the self-executing smart contract governing the sale. Valid Transfer of Rights?

article thumbnail

[Guest post] What is an NFT? A comment to the EUIPO Guidance on NFTs

The IPKat

In all these instances, what has been considered as “legal property” is the token generated through the smart contract and not the digital file linked (or “authenticated”, to refer to the EUIPO’s own wording) to it.