article thumbnail

[Guest post] Can the owner of an artistic work convert it into an NFT for its use in the Metaverse?

The IPKat

A few days ago The IPKat reported on the injunction issued by the Rome Court of First Instance regarding the unauthorized minting of NFTs from a trade mark perspective. 5(3)(j): “for the purpose of advertising the public exhibition or sale of artistic works, to the extent necessary to promote the event, excluding any other commercial use”.

article thumbnail

Generative AI and creativity: A quick analysis of US and Canadian copyright registrations for artistic works

Kluwer Copyright Blog

Against that background, this blog post provides some tentative musings on the impact of text-to-image generators on human artistic creativity by analysing recent US and Canadian copyright registrations for artistic works. In contrast, the CIPO has arguably adopted a more liberal attitude to computer-generated works.

Insiders

Sign Up for our Newsletter

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

Trending Sources

article thumbnail

WaterRower: Has the UK’s approach to ‘artistic works’ in copyright changed?

Kluwer Copyright Blog

Unfortunately, the recent decision in WaterRower v Liking [2022] EWHC 2084 (IPEC) was not that case, despite many reporting in the aftermath of the decision that UK copyright has been extended to protect a rowing machine as a ‘work of artistic craftsmanship’. . Works of Artistic Craftsmanship. The WaterRower.

article thumbnail

Never Too Late: If you missed the IPKat last week!

The IPKat

Plant Varieties Jocelyn Bosse reported on a recent decision of the Supreme Peoples Court concerning compensation for the unauthorised plantings and sale of an apple variety called 'Scilate'. The Court of Appeal has confirmed that the Copyright Act of 1976 requires all eligible work to be authored in the first instance by a human being.

article thumbnail

Implications Of AI On Literary And Artistic Works : A Challenge On The Copyright System

IP and Legal Filings

How is then Artificial Intelligence related to Copyrights, with an added intricacy of Literary and artistic work? Applications of artificial intelligence (AI) are capable of independently creating literary and artistic creations. It is a notion held generally ‘AI can create.’ COPYRIGHT PROTECTION AND ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE.

article thumbnail

The Future of Copyright. In memory of Luigi Carlo Ubertazzi (Report 1/2)

The IPKat

The synthetic skills of this GuestKat unfortunately do not allow to summarize all the lectures by these eminent scholars, but a report of the discussions that were made, mainly in their chronological order, is still possible and maybe can provide some food for thoughts for our Kat readers (with many apologies for any oversimplification).

article thumbnail

AI Reporter - June 2024

JD Supra Law

In the entertainment industry, Sony Music asserted that AI companies don’t have permission to use its recording artistsworks for AI training. In response to the industry’s concerns over the use of AI, members of Congress may soon introduce a new act called the NO FAKES Act to protect artists against unauthorized digital replicas.