Artistic Work Licensing Magazine 
The IPKat
SEPTEMBER 24, 2021
Noting the Respondent/Defendant’s evidence that the photographs in question were supplied to it by Virtual Media Network Limited (VMNL) in pursuance of a Channel License Agreement, the Federal High court further held that the Appellant/Plaintiff should have joined VMNL as a party to the suit. VMNL) or both that person and their licensee (i.e.
SpicyIP
MARCH 9, 2025
The Delhi High Court upheld PPLs claims, granting an injunction restraining the defendants from using the sound recordings without a license, reasoning that PPL, as an assignee, retains the right to issue licenses despite not being a registered copyright society. The suit was dismissed with costs, for want of cause of action.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
IP and Legal Filings
MARCH 9, 2022
The concept is important that when any artistic work (like newspaper or magazine) is created and is done during the employment or under the obligation of the contract of apprenticeship, and is for the reason for publication, the proprietor of the publication will be the first owner of the work unless there is a former contract to sabotage this.
Kluwer Copyright Blog
AUGUST 7, 2023
In 1984, Condé Nast, the publisher, obtained a license from Goldsmith to allow Andy Warhol to use her Prince portrait as the foundation for a single serigraphy to be featured in Vanity Fair magazine. In 2016, Condé Nast acquired a license from the Warhol Foundation to use the Prince Series as illustrations for a new magazine.
Velocity of Content
JUNE 15, 2023
To vastly summarize the facts, Andy Warhol licensed permission from photographer Lynn Goldsmith to allow him to adapt photographs she took of performance artist Prince and to allow Warhol to relicense those images in limited circumstances. In fact, Warhol himself paid to license photographs for some of his artistic renditions.
The IPKat
APRIL 4, 2024
The CAB contains stipulations that will ensure equitable remuneration and fair share in royalties for creators of literary, musical and artistic works as well as performers of audio-visual works (clauses 5, 7, 8 and 9 of the CAB). Indeed, the CAB lives up to its core objectives as set out in its long title.
Technology & Marketing Law Blog
JUNE 20, 2023
Supreme Court affirmed the Second Circuit’s ruling that the reproduction of Andy Warhol’s Orange Prince on the cover of a magazine tribute was not a fair use of Lynn Goldsmith’s photo of the singer-songwriter Prince, on which the Warhol portrait was based. Condé Nast paid $400 for the license, which specified “No other usage right granted.”
Expert insights. Personalized for you.
91 
Let's personalize your content