This site uses cookies to improve your experience. To help us insure we adhere to various privacy regulations, please select your country/region of residence. If you do not select a country, we will assume you are from the United States. Select your Cookie Settings or view our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Used for the proper function of the website
Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Strictly Necessary: Used for the proper function of the website
Performance/Analytics: Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
Literary, dramatic, musical, and artisticworks are only protected by copyright if they are “original”. In 1988 when these laws were introduced, “original” meant a work must be the product of the “skill, labour or judgement” of its author. The predominant view was that more time is needed to properly evaluate the options.
As states attempt to protect and capitalize on the fruits of human ingenuity, deciphering the complex web of international treaties and accords governing intellectual property rights have become critical. Geneva, WIPO, 1984.” [3] 3] Kumar, Nagesh. India, Paris Convention and TRIPS.” ‘ Economic and Political Weekly’ 33, no.
Lame comparisons apart, this story is interesting as it is an opportunity to discuss the protectability of artisticworks under Italian laws. This is an hypothesis the resolution of which is relatively easy, because it is expressly disciplined by the Italian CCH. This is for two reasons, as pointed out by E.
With the Beijing Treaty, any performance of literary or artisticworks or expression of folklore is covered by intellectual property, independently from its nature or medium, including both fixed and unfixed works (live performances), acknowledging the creative activity of these performers in the same way as with regard to musicians and authors.
This issue is often discussed in connection to section 9(3) of the Copyright Design and Patents Act (UK) , (CDPA) which provides that in the case of an artisticwork which is computer-generated, the author shall be taken to be the person by whom the arrangements necessary for the creation of the work are undertaken.
NATURE OF THE CASE The above decisions dealt with requests for a preliminary ruling related to the interpretation of Article 3 of Directive 2001/29/EC on the harmonisation of certain aspects of copyright and relatedrights in the information society. 2) Does Article 3 of Directive 2001/29/EC.
We organize all of the trending information in your field so you don't have to. Join 9,000+ users and stay up to date on the latest articles your peers are reading.
You know about us, now we want to get to know you!
Let's personalize your content
Let's get even more personalized
We recognize your account from another site in our network, please click 'Send Email' below to continue with verifying your account and setting a password.
Let's personalize your content