The IPKat

APRIL 25, 2024

This post further explores the argument that the outputs of generative AI tools are unprotected in the UK, despite the language in section 9(3) of the Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988 UK (CDPA) relating to computer-generated works. Does UK copyright law protection extend to computer-generated works which are not original?

Contracts 73

Contracts Artistic Work Copyright Copyright Law 73

LexBlog IP

MARCH 9, 2023

In the lawsuit, Hermès alleged that defendant Mason Rothschild’s MetaBirkins NFTs infringed and diluted Hermès’ trademark rights in the Birkin word mark and design. Rothschild asserted that, due to the artistic nature of his NFTs, all of Hermès’ claims were barred by the First Amendment. ” ( Id.

Litigation 52

Litigation Artistic Work Branding Brands 52

IP and Legal Filings

SEPTEMBER 12, 2022

The lack of organisation and ambiguity make the protection problematic even if the work is copyrighted. According to section 13 (1)(a) of Copyright Act of 1957 copyright subsists in original literary, dramatic, musical and artistic works. Ownership of Copyright. Ownership under employment.

Art 52

Art Copyright Artistic Work Public Domain 52

Kluwer Copyright Blog

OCTOBER 17, 2023

Image from DALL-E 3 Introduction Generative AI is disrupting the creative process(es) of intellectual works on an unparalleled scale. More and more AI systems offer services that push users’ production capacity for new literary and artistic works beyond unforeseen barriers. ChatGPT , Smodin ), to perform music (i.e.,

Copyright 121

Copyright Art Copyright Law Licensing 121

IP and Legal Filings

JANUARY 22, 2024

Introduction The Intellectual property laws are designed in such a way that not only reward the creator of his intellectual creation thereby incentivising other creators for further innovation, while balancing the rights of the creator with the right of the society to access information or knowledge.

Ownership 52

Ownership Copyright Fair Use Intellectual Property 52

Corsearch

FEBRUARY 29, 2024

Gather intellectual property information and infringement evidence • Step 3. Intellectual property rights are defined as legal rights that protect the ownership of artistic, literary, and other creative works. Conversely, lookalikes and knock-off products intentionally exclude trademarks from their design and packaging.

Branding 59

Branding Brands Branding Intellectual Property 59

The IPKat

FEBRUARY 3, 2023

The current generation of AI image generation tools such as Stable Diffusion , Midjourney and DALL·E 2 are designed to take a text description or prompt from a user and generate an image that matches the prompt. What is AI image generation software?

Litigation 143

Litigation Copying Copyright Designs 143

SpicyIP

FEBRUARY 12, 2024

The Respondent operates his business through two incorporated entities and claims ownership of the trademark via the permitted use by the two incorporated entities. The plaintiff contended that all literary rights were transferred to him, and he has been publishing his father’s works since then.

Trademark 103

Trademark Social Media Registering Trademarks Copyright 103

Fish & Richardson Trademark & Copyright Thoughts

JANUARY 5, 2022

6 The potential impact of solid-state batteries on the EV industry in particular is huge, as they hold significantly more energy and charge in less time than traditional lithium-ion batteries, thereby eliminating one of the perceived drawbacks of EV ownership. higher energy density), and more durable than lithium-ion batteries.

Intellectual Property 52

Intellectual Property Technology Journalism IP 52

43(B)log

OCTOBER 4, 2021

Indeed, the PTO has increased its focus on whether the use an applicant is making is trademark use, as opposed to ornamental or informational use, in its registration decisions. 18, 2021), held functional the defendant’s informational use of colored mixing tips for dental equipment to show which mixing tip should be used with which materials.

IP 94

IP Trademark Advertising Advertising 94

Barry Sookman

MAY 4, 2020

” This “creativity machine” was programmed as a series of neural networks that have been trained with general information to independently create the invention. ” See Design Data Corp, 847 F.3d Instead, it was the machine, not a person, which recognized the novelty and salience of the instant invention.

Intellectual Property 52

Intellectual Property Inventor Invention Copyright 52